It's come to this: Moronic Leftist MK thinks Jews first came to Israel from Egypt
Someone must have tipped Stav Shaffir off as to how boorish this tweet was, because it's no longer in her Twitter feed. Fortunately, Channel 10's Akiva Novick (who knows his bible) caught it and posted it to Facebook for posterity with a plea for more bible education in Israeli schools. For the Hebrew-impaired, the Labor party MK's tweet says the following:
"Our history began from Jerusalem" said [Education Minister Naftali] Bennett this morning. Forgive the pettiness, but the Education Minister should know that according to the Torah, we came here from Egypt.
I guess Shaffir's 'education' excluded the book of Genesis....
Netanyahu’s hard-line coalition partner, Education Minister Naftali
Bennett added: “Today a terrorist nuclear superpower is born, and it
will go down as one of the darkest days in world history.”
Yeah, but that's only because he's hardline, right? Hmmm. Maybe not.
Israeli social media accounts were filled with images of former
British prime minister Neville Chamberlain, who pushed a policy of
appeasement toward Adolf Hitler and the Nazis on the eve of World War
II.
Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders blasted the deal even as
negotiators in Vienna were still making the announcement and providing
details.
“Israel will defend itself,” Bennett warned, vowing
that military action is still an option for the Jewish State.
Like-minded Israelis feel they are in the crosshairs of a belligerent
enemy, where last week protesters in Tehran were chanting “Death to
Israel!”
Israel’s security cabinet unanimously rejected the Iran
deal, also saying that Israel reserves the right to take action to
protect the state.
But an Israeli attack seems unlikely right now....
Opposition leaders were united in condemning the Iran deal, but they
also called its signing a major diplomatic failure for Netanyahu.
Speaking
on Israel Radio, Efraim Halevy, former head of the Israeli intelligence
agency Mossad, said that perhaps it would have been better to avoid a
head-on clash with Obama and, instead, seek to apply pressure through
more discreet channels and have more of a role in shaping the
negotiations.
Because after all, former Mossad heads have just been so helpful in helping the government deal with this. Nearly as helpful as Israel's 'loyal opposition.'
Yair Lapid, a top opposition figure and leader of an Israeli
political party, said there is “no daylight” between Israelis in
condemning the Iran deal. But he said Netanyahu bungled the diplomacy.
On
the evening news in Israel, a rough consensus among political
commentators concluded that Netanyahu has been rendered irrelevant,
dismissed by the U.S. administration.
The United States remains
Israel’s closest — and sometimes only — ally in the world, supplying
diplomatic cover and billions of dollars in military aid over the years,
including some of the most sophisticated U.S. arms technology.
In
an interview with Israel’s Army Radio, main opposition leaders Isaac
Herzog and Tzipi Livni both criticized Netanyahu for allowing the deal
to be reached.
“If you go to a deal, as bad as it may be, the way
to minimize its damage is by arriving at an agreement with the U.S. on a
very significant security package,” said Herzog.
And that could still happen after (and when and if) the deal is signed. But Obama wouldn't talk about that before the deal with Iran was done.
As you might imagine, no one here in Israel is very pleased about the impending nuclear deal with Iran. Prime Minister Netanyahu is calling it an historic mistake.
"Iran is going to receive a sure path to
nuclear weapons. Many of the restrictions that were supposed to prevent
it from getting there will be lifted," Netanyahu said at the start of a
meeting with Dutch Foreign Minister Bert Koenders in Jerusalem.
"Iran will get a
jackpot, a cash bonanza of hundreds of billions of dollars, which will
enable it to continue to pursue its aggression and terror in the region
and in the world. This is a bad mistake of historic proportions."
Netanyahu said he would do what he could to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
In the meantime, in a bid to sell the deal to the US Congress, the Obama administration is making the specious claim that sanctions can be 'snapped back' into place.
Iran has accepted
a so-called "snapback" plan that will restore sanctions in 65 days if
it violates a deal agreed with six world powers to curb the country's
nuclear program, diplomats told Reuters on Tuesday.
The
diplomats said a U.N. arms embargo would remain in place for five years
and U.N. missile sanctions would stay in place for eight years.
Of course, the Russians and Chinese would have to agree to the snapback, so even if the sanctions could be 'snapped' back into place (which they cannot), Russia and China would never agree to them anyway.
Buzi Herzog has lived through everything and learned nothing
Israel's Left has spent nearly 20 years turning purported Rabin assassin Yigal Amir into the national bogeyman, while accusing the Right - and particularly Binyamin Netanyahu - of inciting the Rabin assassination. Now, the Left is trying to incite the assassination of Naftali Bennett - who is not as pliable as Binyamin Netanyahu - by putting up posters like the one above which claims that Yigal Amir (who is not allowed to vote) has told his family to vote for Bennett.
Hollande asked both Netanyahu and Abu Mazen not to come
There have been a lot of stories in the Israeli media on Monday, about how Prime Minister Netanyahu was asked to stay home by French President Hollande. And that story is apparently true. But Netanyahu was not the only one who was asked to stay home. So was 'Moderate' 'Palestinian' President Mahmoud AbbasAbu Mazen. This is from the first link.
After the French government began to send invitations to world leaders to participate
in the rally against terror, Hollande’s national security adviser,
Jacques Audibert, contacted his Israeli counterpart, Yossi Cohen, and
said that Hollande would prefer that Netanyahu not attend, the source
said.
Audibert explained that Hollande wanted the event to focus on
demonstrating solidarity with France, and to avoid anything liable to
divert attention to other controversial issues, like Jewish-Muslim
relations or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Audibert said that
Hollande hoped that Netanyahu would understand the difficulties his
arrival might pose and would announce that he would not be attending.
The source noted that one of the French concerns - not conveyed to
representatives of the Israeli government - was that Netanyahu would
take advantage of the event for campaign purposes and make speeches,
especially about the Jews of France. Such statements, the Elysee Palace
feared, would hurt the demonstration of solidarity the French government
was trying to promote as part of dealing with the terror attacks.
According to the source, Netanyahu at first acquiesced to the French
request. In any case, the Shin Bet security service unit that protects
public figures considered the arrangements for the prime minister’s
security to be complex. And so, on Saturday evening, Netanyahu’s people
announced that he would not be flying to Paris because of security
concerns. Netanyahu told the French he would come to France on Tuesday
for a Jewish community event.
The French apparently sent the same message to Palestinian Authority
President Mahmoud Abbas. Like Netanyahu, Abbas acceded to the French
request and released a strange statement about the same time Netanyahu
released his, that he would not be attending the event because of the
bad weather.
However, on Saturday night, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and
Economy Minister Naftali Bennett announced their intention to go to
Paris and take part in the march and meet with the Jewish community.
When Netanyahu heard they were going, he informed the French he would be
attending the march after all.
According to the source, when Cohen informed Audibert that Netanyahu
would be attending the event after all, Audibert angrily told Cohen that
the prime minister’s conduct would have an adverse effect on ties
between the two countries as long as Hollande was president of France
and Netanyahu was prime minister of Israel.
Audibert made it clear that in light of Netanyahu's intention to
arrive, an invitation would also be extended to Abbas. And indeed,
several hours after Abbas announced that he would not be traveling to
Paris, his office issued a statement stating that he would in fact be at
the march.
Hollande's anger at Netanyahu was evident during the ceremony held
Sunday evening following the march at the Grand Synagogue in Paris, an
event attended by hundreds of members of the local Jewish community.
Hollande sat through most of the ceremony, but when Netanyahu's turn at
the podium arrived, the French president got up from his seat and made
an early exit.
Netanyahu's office has denied most of this story. Read the whole thing. I think that given the Friday night massacre at the Kosher supermarket, it would have been outrageous for Netanyahu not to have been there - election campaign or no election campaign. Tzipi Livni and Buzi Herzog could have written this story.
A European diplomat told Foreign Policy on Friday that US Secretary of State John Kerry has begged the Europeans not to push a negotiations deadline between Israel and the 'Palestinians' at the United Nations before Israel's March 17 elections.
Speaking at an annual luncheon with the 28 European Union ambassadors, Kerry
cautioned that any action by the U.N. Security Council would strengthen the hands of
Israeli hardliners who oppose the peace process. Kerry left open the possibility that
the United States might ultimately support some sort of U.N. Security Council
resolution that didn’t prejudge the outcome of stalled political negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. He didn’t offer any details of what that kind of resolution would have to look like.
“Kerry has been very, very clear that for the United States it was not an option to discuss whatever text before the end of the Israeli election,” according to a European diplomat.
Well, duh. I could have figured that out on my own. But Kerry apparently couldn't.
The diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the
luncheon was confidential, said that Kerry explained that Israel’s
liberal political leaders, Shimon Peres and Tipzi Livni, had expressed
concern that a Security Council move to pressure Israel on the eve of
election would only strengthen the hands of Israeli hardliners,
including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Naftali Bennett, an
implacable foe of a Palestinian state and leader of the right-wing
Jewish Home party. Netanyahu is also fiercely opposed to the
Palestinians effort to secure Security Council backing for its statehood
drive.
Kerry said Livni had “told him that such a text imposed by the
international community would reinforce Benjamin Netanyahu and the
hardliners in Israel,” as well as the hardliners in Palestine, according
to the European diplomat.
The message, said another European diplomat, was that U.N. action
would “give more impetus to more right-wing parties, that there was a
risk this could further embolden the more right-wing forces along the
Israeli political spectrum.”
And when word of this story reached Israel after the Sabbath ended, our politicians reacted with fury... at Livni (There's nothing we can do about Peres anymore. He's supposed to have been put out to pasture).
"Tzipi Livni has hit rock-bottom in political subversion," Bennett
stated, "by going behind the back of the sitting government to help
schedule operations that will harm Israel and doing everything to hurt
Bibi / Bennett."
"With all due respect, Livni's interests do not come before the
state's interests, and demanding that an attack on Israel fit her
schedule crosses a red line," he continued. "According to Livni, Israel is a country full of apologies, which is governed by political interests."
"I look forward to opposition leader [and Labor head - ed.] MK
Yitzhak Herzog - whose intentions I sincerely appreciate - disciplining
Tzipi Livni, who over the past few days has abandoned the state entirely
and contributed to an atmosphere of incitement, and who is anarchic and dangerous to his campaign."
...
"This shows that the sole interest of Livni and Herzog is to replace
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who as a bulwark against the
[international] dictates and Palestinian pressure," the Likud partystated
in an official statement Saturday night. It added that they are willing
to make "dangerous withdrawals" and "fold to international pressure."
"This election campaign has crossed all red lines," Likud MK Ofir Akunis stated
Saturday night. "Ms. Livni failed negotiations with the Palestinians,
[which] has been going on for years, and now gives advice to [the]
American foreign minister, only to promote her personal political
interests."
"This is further proof that Livni and Herzog prefer to advance their
political interests over Israel's national interests, and they are
dangerous to Israel," he added.
MK Ayelet Shaked (Jewish Home) wrote on Facebook that the move is "Leftist subversion."
"They asked to postpone cases ambush on Israel not because it is not
good for the country, but that it is not good for the Left in the
elections," Shaked fired. "This is unprecedented."
"I turned to Kerry to safeguard the interests of the State of Israel,
to prevent the world's coercion of Palestinian demands on Israel,"
Livni insisted. "I'm glad I did it and I'm glad that things I do have an
impact on the world, what can not be said about Prime Minister
[Binyamin] Netanyahu."
Livni then took her criticism one step further, taking the multiple
statements by diplomats that she turned to Kerry to prevent Netanyahu
and Economics Minister and Jewish Home Chairman Naftali Bennett from
getting votes and claiming instead that they should "thank" her for doing their job for them.
"Netanyahu and Bennett instead of criticizing me, should call me and
thank me for helping them in doing what they cannot," she declared.
Saturday night at the movies: Naftali Bennett kicks Martin Indyk's a**
This video is a bit long. It's a lengthy conversation that took place at the Saban Forum of the Brookings Institute on Saturday night between Jewish Home party leader Naftali Bennett and former 'mediator' Martin Indyk. Indyk opens by saying that Bennett promised to 'kick his a**." Bennett delivers.
Let's go to the videotape.
For those who don't have time to sit through the entire video, there's a summary here.
Were Israel to hold an election now, Netanyahu's party would take 22 of parliament's 120 seats; Bennett's 17; Lapid's 9 - @Channel2News
— Dan Williams (@DanWilliams) December 2, 2014
One reason he felt comfortable doing this is the tweet above. Lapid's party (which currently has 19 seats) will be cut in half, while I've seen polls that indicate that Livni's party will disappear.
The likely beneficiary of the move is the Jewish Home party leader, Naftali Bennett.
Bennett stands to gain because, according to every single poll, his
party is the only one that can be expected to grow by 50% or more in the
ballots. Presently, Jewish Home has 12 MKs. The polls predict 17, 19,
maybe more. These numbers are commensurate with those Bennett had in the
polls in late 2012, before an extremely hurtful – and self-injuring –
Likud election campaign reduced his public support.
Bennett is now the likely candidate for minister of defense, come
April. Since defense is Bennett's forte – although finances are
certainly not a point of weakness for the all-Israeli hi-tech superstar
economics minister – this is without a doubt the position he is angling
for. The public is not ready for Bennett as prime minister, and people
close to him, like Minister Uri Orbach, say so too. But a successful and
dominant defense minister who brings security back to the Israeli
streets, and possibly spearheads a strike on Iran's nuclear industry,
later in his term, is a shoo-in to replace Binyamin Netanyahu at the
country's helm, when the time comes.
Leaks from Netanyahu and Bennett's immediate surroundings confirm
that Bennett has been talking to Netanyahu about the position of defense
minister, post-elections, and that Netanyahu has come to accept that
Bennett will be his most senior partner in the next government. Bennett
confirmed as much – most likely intentionally – when he scolded Minister Uri Ariel
the other day, and told him that his insistence on taking up more space
on the Jewish Home list than Bennett is willing to give him will cost
the party the defense minister's position.
Others who may benefit from the March 17 elections (which were agreed upon by party heads on Wednesday morning - the government should officially fall on Wednesday afternoon) are the Haredi parties.
Primaries will be held in Likud and Jewish Home in early
January, with votes on the head of the Likud on January 6 and similar
votes for leadership of Jewish Home the day before.
Hareidi MK Menachem Eliezer Moses (United Torah Judaism) spoke about
the recent polls that indicate Netanyahu will need the hareidi parties
in order to form a new coalition, saying "according to the polls we see
that without the hareidim it's impossible to move, no?"
Netanyahu accused Lapid the night before of trying to form an
alternate coalition to replace him with the hareidim, even as Lapid
denied siding with the hareidim in pubic statements. Netanyahu likewise
denied reports he had sought out a coalition with the hareidim.
The election's timing is likely to help the Haredim. It occurs on the Tuesday before the end of the winter semester in Yeshivas and Kollelim (the semester ends on Thursday the 19th in most of them). That means the final run-up to the election won't interfere too much with studies, while the vote will take place before many of the scholars leave for the Passover holiday. Hmmm.
For those who are wondering about my relative silence over the last couple of days, I have been busy earning a living this week....
Jewish Home party leader and Economy Minister Naftali Bennett went at it with a BBC reporter on Tuesday after the Har Nof synagogue terror attack. Bennett showed a picture on the air that the BBC would rather not cause you to have nightmares.
Just whom are you calling 'chickensh*t', Mr. President?
Simon Wiesenthal Center founder and director Rabbi Marvin Hier is demanding that President Hussein Obama 'name, apologize for and repudiate,' the anonymous official who called Prime Minister Netanyahu 'chickenshi*t.' This is from the first link.
In a telephone call with The Algemeiner from his Los Angeles
office, an incensed Rabbi Hier declared: “It is rather ironic that a
senior American official is prepared to curse his friends, yet when it
comes to the mortal enemies of the United States – as the Iranians
discovered during the recent nuclear negotiation – praise is heaped on
them.”
Goldberg’s piece extensively quoted an anonymous “senior Obama
administration official” who showered Netanyahu with invective, saying,
“The thing about Bibi is, he’s a chickenshit.”
Goldberg then observed:
“Over the years, Obama administration officials have described Netanyahu
to me as recalcitrant, myopic, reactionary, obtuse, blustering,
pompous, and ‘Aspergery.’ (These are verbatim descriptions; I keep a
running list.)”
The word “Aspergery” is a derogatory term for individuals with
Asperger Syndrome, a form of autism that affects the part of the brain
that processes emotions.
The same official is quoted as saying: “The good thing about
Netanyahu is that he’s scared to launch wars. The bad thing about him is
that he won’t do anything to reach an accommodation with the
Palestinians or with the Sunni Arab states. The only thing he’s
interested in is protecting himself from political defeat.”
Another senior official, Goldberg wrote, “agreed that Netanyahu is a
‘chickenshit’ on matters related to the comatose peace process, but
added that he’s also a ‘coward’ on the issue of Iran’s nuclear threat.”
Commenting on the remarks of this second official, Hier asserted: “He
said Netanyahu is a coward for not taking pre-emptive action against
Iran, but I suppose this anonymous official who is hiding behind his
desk is very brave.”
Asked whether he thought Obama should fire the officials who made
these comments, Hier said “that’s up to the president.” However, he
added, “a senior American official who doesn’t name himself and then
hurls curse words at one of our strongest allies should be repudiated by
the president. President Obama needs to make it clear that these
officials don’t speak for him.
Most of all, an apology is in order: That
is not the way a senior American official should speak to the Prime
Minister of Israel, that is not the way to conduct foreign policy.”
But what if the 'senior official' is Obama himself? Could he repudiate himself? (He wouldn't - nor would he apologize or name himself because Obama is as yellow-bellied as they come, so the second question is almost beside the point). Goldberg is known to be close to Obama, and to allow himself to be used as a mouthpiece when Obama wants to get something out there. It's definitely not beyond Obama to make that kind of comment and to use Goldberg to spread the word.
“The United States administration is planning to throw Israel under
the bus,” Jewish Home chairman Naftali Bennett said on Tuesday night,
responding to harsh words against Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu which were attributed to senior officials in the Obama administration.
“Israel is stronger than all those who curse it,” said Bennett, after Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic quoted officials in Washington as having described Netanyahu as “chickens**t”, among other things.
“The prime minister is not a private individual, but the leader of
the Jewish State and the Jewish world as a whole. Serious curses such as
these against the Israeli Prime Minister are harmful to millions of
citizens of Israel and Jews worldwide,” added Bennett.
“Neither the leader of Syria, who has slaughtered 150,000 of his
citizens, nor the leader of Saudi Arabia, who stones women and gays,
have been called ‘chickens**t. If what is written is true, then the
current administration intends to throw Israel under the wheels of the
bus,” he said.
...
“Instead of attacking Israel and forcing suicide conditions upon it,
it should be strengthened. I call upon the U.S. administration to
renounce these abusive remarks and reject them outright,” he concluded.
Fat chance. I honestly believe that comment was made by Obama himself. In fact, the second 'anonymous official' who agreed is likely John Kerry. Anyone want to argue with me? Anyone looking at the picture above have any doubts about who is 'chickensh*t' and who is not?
UPDATE 8:44 AM
Now that I think about it, one of the officials is likely Martin Indyk, who is known for blamingIsrael and for his foul mouth.
With the end of the holiday and the Sabbath here in Israel, it's become clear that 'moderate' 'Palestinian' President Mahmoud AbbasAbu Mazen's United Nations General Assembly speech was quite a success... but not quite for the reasons he wanted. Abu Mazen has managed to unite Israeli politicians across the board in blasting him for his hatred.
"Mahmoud Abbas has again proved his only expertise is spreading lies
and incitement against Israel," Communications Minister Gilad Erdan
(Likud) slammed Saturday night. "He has denied the Holocaust in the past and now, in this surreal speech at the UN, he has accused us of 'genocide.'"
"This is not how a 'peace partner' talks, and certainly not anyone
who wants for 'reconciliation between peoples," Erdan continued. "Now it
is clear why he insists on partnering with the Hamas terrorist
organization, with whom he shares the 'struggle against Israel' and will
promote our delegitimization through false propaganda."
"Mahmoud Abbas always finds a soft spot for murderers, rocket
launchers, and our enemies in general," Jewish Home Chairman and
Economics Minister Naftali Bennett added. "We saw missiles launched at
Ben Gurion Airport two months ago, and it's good to know these launchers
are members of Mahmoud Abbas's 'Palestinian state.'"
"Now Israel must find new and creative ways to allow us to just
survive here," Bennett fumed. "A Palestinian state west of the Jordan
River is not one of them."
Even the extreme left took issue with Abbas's speech.
"While Israel has acted harshly in Gaza and made things difficult
[for the Palestinians], you cannot call it 'genocide," Meretz Chairman
Zahava Gal-On stated Saturday. Gal-On - who did not explicitly condemn
Abbas - did add, however, that Abbas's words were "serious and grave." [But see below. CiJ]
"These are false and outrageous statements," MK Eitan Cabel (Labor),
added. "It would have been better if they had not spoken, and these
words are worthy of condemnation from all who truly love peace."
Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon had some more biting remarks.
"Through his speech at the UN, Mahmoud Abbas proves for the umpteenth
time: this is not a leader who wants peace and the advancement of his
people's lives, but a person who distributes lies, incitement, and hate
speech against Israel," Ya'alon stated Saturday. "Mahmoud Abbas is not a
man of peace, and is not really interested in an agreement with Israel,
which means recognition of the Jewish national homeland."
"Time after time, Mahmoud Abbas goes on to deceive the international
community, to throw at Israel false and racist accusations out of the
hope that threats, pressure, and lies will scare us and make us
acquiesce [to his demands]," Ya'alon continued.
Ya'alon implied that Abbas's speech was particularly grave, and may have jettisoned future plans to renew peace talks.
"He has no partner for a political agreement - which is essential to
end the conflict - and we will therefore not compromise the security of
Israeli citizens," Ya'alon said, referencing plans to make a Palestinian
state in Judea and Samaria. "In every situation, we are responsible for
our own destiny and our own security, and we will be in the future."
Ya'alon concluded by blasting Abbas for "not really coming to terms
with our own existence" and added that the claims "are detached from
reality."
Prime Minister Netanyahu is on his way to the United States to counter Abu Mazen's (and Iranian President Hassan Rohani's) 'slander and lies.'
But despite the quotation above, Meretz leader Zehava Gal-On actually backed Abu Mazen.
“Meretz supports Abbas’s international efforts to bring the end of the occupation and to get international recognition as a [Palestinian] state and member of the UN before and as a corridor to reaching peace in bilateral negotiations between equals,” the party leader said.
The speech reflected Abbas’s total distrust of Netanyahu as a partner for peace, Gal-On said.
According to Gal-On, “Netanyahu refused to negotiate for five years and the talks under American sponsorship led nowhere and wild construction continued in the settlements. Now Netanyahu wants to continue ‘managing the conflict’ instead of solving it,” she lamented.
Gal-On proves the prophet Isaiah right once again. Isaiah warned that those who would destroy us would spring forth from among us. What could go wrong?
It is now being reported that what was fired from Gaza on Israel around 6:30 this evening was a rocket and not a mortar.
There have been mixed reports on the precise nature of the projectile fired, with Channel 10 saying
the attack was a mortar shell as opposed to a rocket; likewise, IDF
spokesperson Lt. Col. Peter Lerner labeled it a mortar shell on the
IDF's official Twitter feed. However, nearly all other major Israeli media sources have identified it as a rocket attack.
As is usually the case outside of an official operation, Hamas is claiming that it did not do it.
The Hamas terrorist organization claimed Tuesday night that it had
nothing to do with the rocket attack, saying it remains committed to the
ceasefire. Hamas breached numerous ceasefires during Operation
Protective Edge, as well as over the course of recent years.
"The Palestinian factions are committed to the truce," spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said. "We want it to continue."
He questioned whether the attack as reported by Israel had in fact
taken place. "There is no evidence that there was mortar fire from the
Gaza Strip," he said.
Yeah, right....
Politicians on the right say Israel must respond in order to avoid a deterioration in the situation.
MK Danny Danon (Likud) spoke out after the attack, saying "we must
not compromise with terror, we should have subdued Hamas during
Operation Protective Edge because terror doesn't change its face."
"Now we must respond with strength in response to the fire for the
sake of deterrence and for the sake of the faith residents of the south
gave to the leadership which said there will be quiet for a long time,"
stated Danon.
The former deputy defense minister, who has been critical of
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu over his management of the operation,
added "only 21 days have past and we're returning to the trickle of
terror from the Gaza Belt. Self-restraint now signals acceptance of the
situation."
The attack came hours after Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon predicted that Hamas would not renew its terror attacks on Israel on September 25 if an agreement - which appears unlikely - is not in place. Hmmm.
In the meantime, Yaalon is being slammed by MK's from the Jewish Home party for dismissing an IDF officer - alleged to be former IDF chief rabbi Avichai Ronsky - for leaking information to Jewish Home party leader Naftali Bennett.
"Hamas fired a multi-rocket salvo in honor of the agreement to reconstruct Gaza.
But the defense minister is busy hazing (former IDF Chief) Rabbi
(Avichai) Ronski and slandering Minister Bennett," wrote [Jewish Home party MK Orit] Struk, noting a
dispute over information Bennett reportedly used to attack top IDF
brass in Security Cabinet meetings.
While Ronski was identified in reports as being the suspected source of the leaks who was later dismissed, he told Arutz Sheva on
Tuesday that he did not pass any materials to Bennett, has not heard
anything of the dismissal - and indeed still is scheduled to perform
reserve duty next month.
Not responding to this rocket fire from Gaza would be a terrible mistake and would invite a creeping escalation of the rocket fire from Gaza - as has happened after the end of every other operation. Will the government authorize the IDF to respond? I would guess that we will know the answer to that question before the sun is up in Israel on Wednesday morning - about seven hours from now.
His popularity dropped from 82% to 38% in seven weeks
No, it's not Barack Hussein Obama whose popularity dropped from 82% to 38% in seven weeks. And it's not George H.W. Bush whose popularity dropped dramatically in the aftermath of the First Gulf War. It's Binyamin Netanyahu whose popularity has dropped... because the war is still going and Israel has not decisively defeated Hamas.
A new poll released by the Hebrew-language Channel 2 news
site on Monday reveals that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's approval
rating has fallen as a "casualty" in the faltering Operation Protective
Edge.
The poll, conducted by Shiluv Millward Brown and iPanel for the news
source, found in the last four days Netanyahu's support has taken a
sharp nose-dive.
A mere 38% of Israelis responded that they are satisfied with
Netanyahu, as opposed to 50% who are dissatisfied. Just four days
earlier, Netanyahu's support stood at 55%.
The sudden dive corresponds to a period during which four-year-old Daniel Tragerman hy''d
was murdered by mortar fire in his Kibbutz Nahal Oz home last Friday,
possibly contributing to a feeling of government neglect in providing
security to its citizens.
The poll adds that three weeks ago Netanyahu's support was at 63%;
towards the beginning of the operation early last month when the IDF
began its ground entry to Gaza that it later withdrew, that support was
at a whopping 82%.
A University of Haifa poll late last month likewise found that
Netanyahu's support had spiked at the start of the operation, showing
that 65% were "very satisfied" with Netanyahu's handling of the operation, 20% were "satisfied" and only 10% "not satisfied."
However, that support has dipped as Netanyahu continues to be
unable to take decisive action against Hamas in an operation that
started July 8, while making numerous ceasefire agreements that Hamas repeatedly breaks, and "softening" ministers to Israeli concessions.
Ironically, US President Barack Obama told the New York Times earlier this month in an interview that Netanyahu had too much public support,
and that he needed internal pressure - not to defend Israel, but rather
to make land concessions to the Palestinian Authority (PA).
If Netanyahu wants to stay in office, he has to stop listening to Obama and finish the job. And if Obama doesn't want to find himself sitting in the oval office next to Naftali Bennett or Avigdor Lieberman, he is going to have to bite his lip and let Netanyahu finish the job. The Israeli public is furious and is not in the mood to make any concessions to the 'Palestinians,' to Hamas or to anyone else. And the longer this goes on, the less likely that they will favor any concessions to the 'Palestinians' in Judea and Samaria either. Everyone in this country knows that the IDF is capable of finishing the job - if only they were allowed to finish it.
Regarding whether to start the school year if rocket fire continues, 18% said to open schools all over the country, 63% said school should begin everywhere except the South, and 15% said all schools in the country should remain closed.
Bennett to BBC: 'How many Israelis need to die for us to gain your sympathy'?
The last Israeli I recall being as good at putting the foreign media in their place was Binyamin Netanyahu. Another great interview (from Wednesday) by Economics Minister Naftali Bennett, this time with the BBC.
Obama may yet long for the current Netanyahu government
As much as President Hussein Obama may loathe Prime Minister Netanyahu and his current government, one day soon Obama may actually look back on it nostalgically.
There's a new poll out, and while it shows that Netanyahu would likely remain Prime Minister if he chose to call elections today, he would do so with a much more Right leaning government. While today, the Right and religious parties hold 61 of the Knesset's 120 seats, this poll indicates that they would hold 70 were elections to be held today.
The poll gives Likud 28 seats (up from 19), the Jewish Home 19 (up
from 12), Yisrael Beytenu 9 (down from 12), Shas 7 (down from 11),
United Torah Judaism (UTJ) is unchanged at 7.
All in all, the nationalist-religious bloc is at 70 seats – up 9 from
its current 61 seats, which gives it a bare majority in the Knesset.
Also in the poll, Yesh Atid is clipped down to 11 seats from the
current 19, Hatnua is at 4 seats, down from the current six, Meretz has
10 (up from 6) and Labor remains at 15. Kadima is wiped off the
political map.
Israelis continue to favor Binyamin Netanyahu for prime minister.
Thirty percent see him as the politician best suited for the role.
Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett is in second place with 16%. Labor
head Yitzchak Herzog has 11%, whereas ministers Avigdor Liberman and
Tzipi Livni each enjoy 6% support. Yair Lapid is at a meager 3%, along
with Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon.
The Jewish Home party has finished in second place in five of the
six polls conducted since the start of Operation Protective Edge
(Dialog, Smith, Midgam and Panels).
We're going to see a much more hostile Obama after November. This is only going to get worse. Today (the missile shipment hold-up) was just the opening shot across the bow.
Naftali Bennett v. Sky News: 'When buses exploded in London, they gave out candies in Gaza'
Naftali Bennett deals with a difficult Sky News reporter who apparently thinks that Israel should supply Hamas with Iron Dome and should allow Hamas to use human shields.
Bennett to BBC: 'The 'human rights' groups will criticize us even if we hand out chocolates'
Here's the reason why Naftali Bennett's Jewish Home party is gaining in the polls faster than the Likud. Here's a great interview that Bennett did with the BBC today.
I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com