#Wikileaks: Clinton: 'A Potemkin process better than nothing,' exploit Bibi's apology to Israeli Arabs
You might recall that in the final days of the 2015 election, as he was panicked that the Obama administration was underhandedly attempting to remove him, Prime Minister Netanyahu urged Right wing voters to come out and vote to prevent the Arab population from causing the Left to win the election. Later, Netanyahu walked back those remarks.
Netanyahu on Election Day: 'White House is trying to topple me'
On Israeli Election Day in March 2015, Prime Minister Netanyahu called a senior Israeli reporter and told him that the White House 'is trying to topple me.'
At 1:36 P.M. on March 17, 2015, a senior Israeli
journalist fielded a phone call. “I’m transferring the prime minister,” the
voice on the other end told him. “Hello, Mr. Netanyahu,” the reporter
began.
“I want to tell you that what’s happening today
is election stealing,” Benjamin Netanyahu thundered. “Nothing like this has ever
happened in any democracy anywhere. Because you’re in the press, you didn’t
report on this scandal here. I’m about to lose the election.”
The astonished reporter asked the prime minister
what he was talking about and added, “You’re [going to be] the next prime
minister.”
“I'm not,” Netanyahu answered. “The V15 movement,
backed by the American administration, brought software programs
here …. You know what I'm talking about. I don’t want to elaborate over the
phone, okay? Super-software that locates voters.”
The reporter had no idea what software the prime
minister was alluding to. He also sensed paranoia in Netanyahu’s next remarks
about a global conspiracy to topple him that included Washington, espionage
agencies, the V15 movement that sought to unseat him, opposition leader Isaac
Herzog and the Israeli media.
“What do you suggest I do with this
information?” the journalist asked. “The vote is today.”
“I want you to know that this is what happened,”
Netanyahu said, ending the conversation by making an accusation in the plural.
“You won’t touch it. You aren’t handling [the story.] That's why I'm going to
lose the election.”
Netanyahu won the election. But he was right about V15. They did try to topple him. Fortunately, they failed.
US Senate Subcommittee confirms: Obama sent US taxpayer money to Israel in bid to unseat Netanyahu - UPDATED AND PURGED EMAILS PROVING IT
During Israel's 2015 Knesset elections, a group called V15 attempted to mount a 'grass roots' challenge to Prime Minister Netanyahu. V15 was staffed by Obama campaign staff and financed by Obama supporters (or so we thought) S. Daniel Abraham, the billionaire founder of the Slim Fast food
line, Daniel Lubetzky, a social entrepreneur whose OneVoice Movement is partnered with V15 and Alon Kastiel, a Tel Aviv-based businessman and owner of multiple local venues, including bars, clubs and hotels.
Almost immediately, Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tx) and Congressman Lee Zeldin (R-NY) sent a letter to Secretary of State Kerry asking whether media reports that US taxpayer money was being used by V15 to unseat Netanyahu were true.
Today, we have an answer to that question. Under the auspices of Chairman Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) has released a report
today confirming allegations that an NGO with connections to President
Obama’s 2008 campaign (that would be Lubetzky's One Voice, which partnered with V15) used U.S. taxpayer dollars attempting to oust
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015. This is from Jennifer Rubin.
A press release states:
Today,
U.S. Senators Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.),
Chairman and Ranking Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations (PSI), released a bipartisan report examining the U.S.
State Department’s grants to OneVoice—a non-governmental organization
operating in Israel and the Palestinian Territories. The group received
nearly $350,000 in grants from the U.S. State Department to support
peace negotiations between Israelis and the Palestinian Authority over a
14-month grant period ending in November 2014. In December 2014,
Israeli elections were called following the collapse of peace
negotiations.
The Subcommittee’s investigation concludes that
OneVoice Israel complied with the terms of its State Department grants.
Within days after the grant period ended, however, the group deployed
the campaign infrastructure and resources created, in part, using U.S.
grant funds to support a political campaign to defeat the incumbent
Israeli government known as V15. That use of government-funded
resources for political purposes after the end of the grant period was
permitted by the grant because the State Department failed to adequately
guard against the risk that campaign resources could be repurposed in
that manner or place limitations on the post-grant use of resources.
McCaskill tried to put the best face on it.
"While this report shows no wrongdoing by the Administration, and
should put to rest such allegations, it certainly highlights
deficiencies in the Department’s policies that should be addressed in
order to best protect taxpayer dollars.”
Really? No wrongdoing in using US taxpayer dollars to unseat the democratically elected Prime Minister of an ally? I must have been asleep in my Constitutional Law class when they said that was okay.
Through a spokesman, Portman had a different view.
The campaign’s explicit goal was to elect “anybody but Bibi [Netanyahu]” by mobilizing center-left voters. . . .
The
State Department permitted One Voice to use a taxpayer-funded grant to
build valuable political infrastructure—large voter contact lists, a
professionally trained network of grassroots organizers/activists, and
an impressive social media platform—for the putative purpose of
supporting peace negotiations. But during the federal grant period,
OneVoice devised a plan to target Prime Minister Netanyahu; immediately
after the grant period ended, OneVoice deployed its taxpayer-funded
campaign resources to launch the largest anti-Netanyahu grassroots
organizing campaign in Israel in 2015. Despite OneVoice’s known history
of political activism in Israel, the State Department did nothing to
guard against the clear risk that OneVoice could engage in
electioneering activities using a taxpayer-funded grassroots campaign
infrastructure after the grant period. Remarkably, according to the
State Department, OneVoice’s conduct was fully compliant with Department
regulations and guidelines.
And I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop and to hear that both the White House and the State Department enthusiastically approved OneVoice's activities.
But wait. There's more.
Among the report’s most damning findings, evidence was found that the
“durable campaign resources” built during the grant with taxpayer
dollars included “a larger voter contact database, a professionally
trained network of grassroots activists across the country, and an
enhanced social media presence on Facebook and Twitter. OneVoice was
even permitted to use State Department funds to hire an American
political consulting firm called 270 Strategies — run by Obama
2008 campaign veterans — to train its activists in how to execute a
‘grassroots mobilization’ campaign.”
Can't wait to hear all the lemmings tell us how this is the 'most pro-Israel administration evah.' UNbelievable.
PS For those wondering why I am up at this hour even though I'm in Israel.... I got counterparty comments and client comments on an agreement between 11:00pm and Midnight and the client asked that I read his comments and call. That's all for tonight....
UPDATE 1:47 AM
Sorry - not all for tonight. The State Department purged the emails that proved it. This is Adam Kredo.
A senior State Department official admitted to congressional
investigators that he deleted several emails pertaining to the
administration’s coordination with OneVoice.
“The State Department was unable to produce all documents responsive
to the Subcommittee’s requests due to its failure to retain complete
email records of Michael Ratney, who served as U.S. Consul General in
Jerusalem during the award and oversight of the OneVoice grants,” the
report states.
Investigators “discovered this retention problem because one
important email exchange between OneVoice and Mr. Ratney … was produced
to the Subcommittee only by OneVoice,” the report continues. “After
conducting additional searches, the Department informed the Subcommittee
that it was unable to locate any responsive emails from Mr. Ratney’s
inbox or sent mail.”
Ratney was ultimately forced to tell investigators that “[a]t times I
deleted emails with attachments I didn’t need in order to maintain my
inbox under the storage limit.”
While Ratney had the option to archive emails—as required by the
department—he did not do this. Ratney claimed he was not aware of the
rule, stating he “did not know [he] was required to archive routine
emails.”
The deletion of the email chains appears to be a violation of the
Federal Records Act, which mandates official records be archived for
future disclosure purposes.
Note - this is on John Kerry's watch and not on Hillary Clinton's. Yes, John Kerry is just as corrupt as Hillary Clinton.
One source with intimate knowledge of the situation told the Free Beacon that the deletion of these emails is highly suspicious given the seriousness of the claims about the administration’s behavior.
“The Obama administration had the money, skills, and personnel to
build a gigantic campaign infrastructure that was used to try to defeat
the prime minister of an ally,” the source said. “But apparently they
didn’t have what they needed to store the emails in which they did all
of those things. That’s certainly a lucky break for the State
Department.”
State Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters Tuesday
afternoon that he could not comment on the accusations due to the
department’s inability to thoroughly review the Senate’s report.
“We’ve not had time to go through it closely, so I’m not going to be
able to comment on specifics,” Kirby said. “But I would note that the
report makes clear there’s no evidence that OneVoice spent State
Department grant funds to influence the Israeli election. Again, I just
don’t have additional comment at this time.”
Even McCaskill admitted that OneVoice spent US government funds to influence the Israeli elections. She just claimed it didn't show 'wrongdoing.'
JPost discovers 'exclusively' that only Left-wing NGO's receive money from foreign governments - UPDATED
JPost is shocked, just shocked, to discover that nearly all the NGO's being targeted by the new NGO transparency bill being debated in the Knesset are Leftist.
On Thursday, The Post exclusively obtained the list of NGOs
which show that 23 out of the 25 organizations are left-wing, with only
two being centrist or non-affiliated. There are no right-wing
organizations.
The Justice Ministry bill in question, which
returned to the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee on
Wednesday after passing a first reading in the plenum, requires any NGO
receiving more than half its funding from a foreign political entity
identify itself as such in any publications and any meetings with public
officials, and has been controversial because most of the organizations
under the bill’s purview were predicted to be left-wing. The list,
obtained on Thursday, confirms that that suspicion.
...
The organizations listed included, B’Tselem, Breaking the Silence, the
Economic Cooperation Foundation, Yesh Din and The Public Committee
Against Torture in Israel. According to the Justice Ministry report,
Yesh Din, for example, receives NIS 4.7 million of its NIS 5.3 million
budget from foreign political entities. B’Tselem gets NIS 6.2 million of
its NIS 9 million budget from foreign sources as well.
On Wednesday, Nonprofits Registrar representative Yafit Shemer
told the Knesset committee that the legislation on transparency for
organizations getting most of their budgets from foreign governments
will affect 27 NGOs.
Committee chairman Nissan Slomiansky (Bayit
Yehudi) prohibited Shemer from presenting the list to the MKs, arguing
that he wants the bill to be “clean” of being drafted in a way that
would target specific NGOs, sparking vocal debate among lawmakers. The
Justice Ministry did not respond to requests for the list.
The reason the Left needs funding from foreign governments is because most Israelis have turned Right after the Oslo debacle, and will not support Leftist NGO's.
But don't worry. This bill will eventually go to the Supreme Court which will undoubtedly find an excuse to strike it down. Maybe then we can have a rational discussion about the balance of powers and the Supreme Court's dictatorship in this country. But probably not.
Funny how no one bothered to interview Professor Gerald Steinberg, the director of NGO Monitor and the country's leading expert on this issue, for this article.
UPDATE 4:31 PM
Professor Steinberg is quoted in an earlier article on this issue.
NGO Monitor President Prof. Gerald Steinberg said donations of more
than NIS 100m. per year from foreign governments “distort Israeli
democracy and dangerously damage its sovereignty.”
But this
should be mitigated by dialogue with lawmakers in Europe, many of whom
oppose their government’s donations to political organizations.
Of course, those European lawmakers seem to be having trouble stopping those contributions....
Oh and here is another interesting tidbit from that earlier article.
Also on Wednesday, the Knesset approved in a preliminary reading the
“V15 bill,” meant to make American- style Super PACs illegal. The
measure proposed by MK Yoav Kisch (Likud) would limit political
organizations’ ability to raise funds in an election year by making the
limitations on NGOs involved in elections similar to those on a
political party.
The legislation is nicknamed “V15” after an
organization that campaigned against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
in the last election using advanced data methods to target voters
door-to-door.
No, Saudi King Salman did not finance Netanyahu's campaign
A story in the Middle East Observer, allegedly based on the Panama Papers, has gained a lot of traction for its claim that Saudi King Salman donated $80 million to Prime Minister Netanyahu's 2015 election campaign.
Isaac Herzog, member of the Knesset and
Chairman of the Israeli Labor party, revealed that Saudi king Salman
bin Abdulaziz financed the election campaign of Israeli Prime Minister,
Benjamin Netanyahu.
“In March 2015, King Salman has
deposited eighty million dollars to support Netanyahu’s campaign via a
Syrian-Spanish person named Mohamed Eyad Kayali. The money was deposited
to a company’s account in British Virgin Islands owned by Teddy Sagi,
an Israeli billionaire and businessman, who has allocated the money to
fund the campaign Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu”, Herzog
cited a leaked Panama Paper.
Likud MK Benny Begin is a rarity in Israeli politics: an honest politician. It's a sad commentary on both Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government's prospects for survival that Netanyahu has in essence forced Begin to resign from the government.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a Facebook post Friday that
while he would “make every effort to incorporate MK Benny Begin into
the cabinet later,” Likud’s coalition partners had objected to changing
the agreed-on number of portfolios per faction, making it impossible to
keep both Begin and Erdan.
Netanyahu’s Facebook post seemingly left Begin no choice but to announce his resignation from the cabinet.
“Over the past few days I have turned to my friends
and partners, the heads of the coalition, with a personal request to
leave our friend, Benny Begin, as an additional Likud minister in the
government,” Netanyahu wrote. However, the coalition partners would not
permit the number of ministers per faction to change and allow Likud to
have 13 ministers.
Netanyahu, who effusively praised Begin in the post,
also wrote that “there is not a shred of truth to the claim that he
[Begin] said he would refuse to resign from the cabinet.”
...
Begin was first appointed minister without portfolio, while Erdan,
who was number two on the Likud Knesset list, remained outside the
cabinet after turning down an offer to become public security minister.
Erdan wanted the Foreign Ministry portfolio, which Netanyahu insists on
holding himself, or a ministerial portfolio that included elements of
both the interior and public security ministries.
When Erdan’s demands were not met, he refused to
join the cabinet. However, last week Erdan agreed to become minister of
public security, strategic affairs and public diplomacy.
Erdan’s appointment angered his fellow party member
MK Zeev Elkin, who was initially given the strategic affairs portfolio
along with immigrant absorption. He then demanded to be made Jerusalem
affairs minister and threatened that, otherwise, he would absent himself
from Knesset votes, which could put the coalition at risk considering
its razor-thin majority (61-59).
Netanyahu subsequently had to break his
commitment to Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat that the Jerusalem Affairs
Ministry would be abolished and its powers absorbed into the Prime
Minister’s Office.
One MK having a temper tantrum is enough to bring down this government. Anyone want to take bets on how long it will last?
UPDATE 3:57 PM
Get a load of these two tweets from JPost Knesset correspondent Lahav Harkov.
It's not that surprising that Begin would have resigned and not told anyone, since he refuses to hire a spokesperson.
BREAKING: Israel's Netanyahu apologizes for offending Arab citizens with his comments during election.
— The Associated Press (@AP) March 23, 2015
Given that the most pro-Likud town in the country was also an Arab town, maybe next time Netanyahu should be more precise and say that people are being brought en masse to vote for the Arab parties.
One reason President Hussein Obama is so enraged at Prime Minister Netanyahu might be that Netanyahu managed to defeat one of the nastiest sets of dirty tricks ever thrown at or by a politician this side of Donald Segretti. David Bernstein has sorted it all out.
So here’s the dynamic:
Netanyahu, while talking tough publicly about terms for an
Israeli-Palestinian deal, was much more accommodating privately during
actual negotiations. Just before Israeli elections, the U.S. government
likely leaks evidence of his flexibility to harm Netanyahu. As a result,
Netanyahu starts to lose right-wing voters to smaller parties, and the
left-leaning major opposition party takes a lead in the polls, putting
Netanyahu’s leadership in question, just as the U.S. wanted.
Netanyahu
responds by using increasingly right-wing rhetoric (including denying
that he ever agreed to the framework in question), to win back the
voters from smaller parties that the leak cost him. He wins, and almost
immediately announces that his campaign rhetoric was misunderstood, and
that he still supports a two-state solution when conditions allow. The
Obama Administration then announces it nevertheless has to reassess
relations with Israel, allegedly because Netanayahu is no longer
committed to the two-state solution.
So you get it? The Obama
Administration, or someone with similar motivations, leaks a document
showing that in practice, Netanyahu was surprisingly flexible in
negotiations sponsored by the U.S. Netanyahu then tries to compensate by
sounding tough in the closing days of his campaign. The administration
then pretends that this is much more meaningful than its actual
experience with Netanyahu, as indicated by the document it likely
leaked, because it was out to punish Israel for electing Netanyahu
regardless.
Indeed, recent reports show that the administration
was planning to retaliate against Israel diplomatically if it reelected
Netanyahu months ago, not only before his controversial election
remarks, but before his Iran speech to Congress was even planned. (In
fact, it wouldn’t be surprising if Israeli intelligence had gotten wind
of this, and thus Netanyahu thought he had little to lose by irritating
Obama further with his speech).
So which of Obama's goals did he accomplish?
Get rid of Bibi? Nope. Not only did Netanyahu win the election, but it looks like we're headed for a more Right wing coalition than the last one.
Get a 'Palestinian state' or get the negotiations for one on track? Nope. Netanyahu is not the one who blew up the negotiations, and having been the target of Obama's cheap shot for being flexible, I would bet on Netanyahu being a lot less flexible when and if (ever) those negotiations resume.
Get Netanyahu to stop telling people how lousy Obama's Iran deal is? Nope. In fact, Obama himself may have been the precipitater of Netanyahu seeking and accepting that invitation to address a joint session of Congress.
And you thought Obama messed up the rest of the Middle East? Oh Bummer....
ח"כ @Ayelet__Shaked מיד ב"אולפן פתוח": "כמו שאני לא קובעת לאובמה מי שריו, הוא לא צריך לקבוע לנו. והם גם לא צריכים להתערב בבנייה ביו"ש"
— ערוץ הכנסת (@knesset99) March 23, 2015
For the Hebrew impaired, the tweet above is from a Knesset Channel (like CSpan in the US) interview with MK Ayelet Shaked, number 2 on the Jewish Home party list and a likely minister in the next Netanyahu government. She says "Just like I don't decide who Obama's ministers are, he shouldn't decide for us. And they also should not be interfering in construction in Judea and Samaria."
She's obviously trying to tell Obama that Israel is a democracy, that the people have spoken, and that it's not his place to interfere.
Somehow, I don't think that message is going to be treated fondly on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington.
Labor party says it's going to opposition, Netanyahu may already have a coalition
More tweets from Israel Radio's Chico Menashe.
@Syechimovich ל@perez_esty : לו היה תיקו הייתי שוקלת ללכת לאחדות. משזה לא קרה- העם אמר את דברו ורוצה את נתניהו בראשות הממשלה.
— chico menashe (@chicomenashe) March 23, 2015
Translation: Former Labor party leader (and Israel Radio broadcaster) Shelly Yacimovich says that the people have spoken, that they want Netanyahu to be the leader, and that her party will be going to the opposition.
A similar announcement came this morning from Yair Lapid regarding his Yesh Atid party.
In the meantime, Prime Minister Netanyahu may already have enough MK's for a coalition.
Kahlon rejects Herzog offer & nominates Netanyahu for Phase 2. BB clinches with 61. Liberman could bring him to 68.
— Jeremy Man Saltan (@TheJeremyMan) March 23, 2015
Of course, he'd still have to get them all to agree on ministries....
In any event, it sounds like President Rivlin's push for a national unity government is already a failure. And that's good news for Israel.
Obama tried even harder than you thought to beat Netanyahu: Expedited visas for Israeli Arabs for 'get out the vote' drive
President Hussein Obama tried even harder than was previously reported (in the US) to defeat Prime Minister Netanyahu (Hat Tip: Memeorandum).
"What was not well reported in the American media is that President
Obama and his allies were playing in the election to defeat Prime
Minister Netanyahu," John McLaughlin, a Republican strategist, said in
an interview on John Catsimatidis's "The Cats Roundtable" radio show
broadcast Sunday on AM 970 in New York.
"There was money moving
that included taxpayer U.S. dollars, through non-profit organizations.
And there were various liberal groups in the United States that were
raising millions to fund a campaign called V15 against Prime Minister
Netanyahu," McLaughlin said.
He noted an effort to oust Netanyahu
was guided by former Obama political operative Jeremy Bird and that V15,
or Victory 15, ads hurt Netanyahu in the polls. McLaughlin said the
Israeli leader rebounded after delivering a speech to Congress early
this month, prompting more critical ads.
V15 was viewed as part of a broader campaign to oust Netanyahu. The group was linked
to Washington-based nonprofit OneVoice Movement, which reportedly
received $350,000 in State Department grants. Money to OneVoice stopped
flowing in November, officials said, before the Israeli elections.
After
Netanyahu's win, V15 co-founder Nimrod Dweck said in an interview with
Ronan Farrow aired on MSNBC's "Jose Diaz-Balart" that "not a single
cent" of State Department or taxpayer money had gone to their campaign.
"These are false allegations and they have nothing to do with reality," Dweck said.
McLaughlin also cited an effort "to organize the [Israeli] Arabs into one party and teach them about voter turnout."
"The
State Department people in the end of January, early February,
expedited visas for [Israeli] Arab leaders to come to the United States
to learn how to vote," McLaughlin said.
"There were people in the
United States that were organizing them to vote in one party so they
would help the left-of-center candidate, Herzog, that the Obama
administration favored," he added.
All except the expedited visas havebeenreportedherebefore. But as usual, the US mainstream media largely ignored it.
When I was in the US the last couple of weeks, I was asked a lot why the Israeli Arabs and the Left were able to unify while the Right was not. Now, we have a clue as to why.
If only Obama expended as much effort on regime change in Iran and Syria as he did in Israel, the world would be a better place.
Sickening: Israel's 'charitable' Left taking election loss out on poor
Reeling from its election loss last week, Israel's 'charitable' Left has identified the enemy: Israel's poor. The Left has decided that since the poor vote for the Likud anyway, the Left will no longer donate to charity.
The latest trend among leftists who were shocked by their defeat at
the polls Tuesday is an apparently spontaneous campaign called “Don't
Give,” which calls on people to stop donating to the poorer Israelis and
the socio-economically weaker regions known as “the periphery,” because
these Israelis insist on voting for Likud, in election after election.
The campaign's name in Hebrew, Lo Latet, is a reference to Latet (“To
Give”), a major charity group that collects donations for the needy.
The campaign started as a Facebook trend, which gathered steam after
it was reported about in the news, and has turned into a Facebook page
with over 3,000 likes.
"As the holiday of Pesach approaches, I would like to remind you that
there are hundreds of people who have no way of celebrating,” wrote one
Lo Latet poster. “It's important that you do not give them a single
shekel.”
He added sarcastically: “After all, elected a government that will
change their situation, so why interfere and ruin things? Happy
holiday!”
"From now on, I want peace of mind,” wrote another poster. “From now
on, it's every one for himself. Don't tell me about minimum wages and
people whose salary doesn't carry them through the month. I don't want
to hear about hungry children or single mothers in distress, about
distressed contract workers, or eroded pensions. Don't preach to me
about 'the people's choice and majority rule', I understand what
democracy is, but from now on, let every person take care of himself.”
Maybe the poor figured out that raising the minimum wage (which was part of Labor's platform) would put more of them out of work. Maybe they figured out that a nuclear Iran and a rocket-laden 'Palestinian state' within firing range of the center of the country would kill all our investments. And maybe - definitely - the Left has shown its true colors as the 'beautiful people' (yefei ha'nefesh in Hebrew) who couldn't care less about anyone but themselves.
And then there were three: McCain tells Obama 'get over your temper tantrum' over Netanyahu
For the third time since Thursday, a United States Senator has blasted President Hussein Obama for his treatment of Prime Minister Netanyahu. This time, it's John McCain (R-Az) on CNN's State of the Union.
Notice what he said at the end about re-examining United Nations funding. That's long overdue anyway.
Still waiting for the first Democratic Senator to publicly attack Obama over his tantrum. Anyone want to take bets on who will go first? I'm betting on Robert Menendez (NJ). He has nothing to lose anyway.
In a speech on the Senate floor, Senator Tom Cotton, the author of the Senate letter to the Iranian mullahs warning that any deal that President Obama signs will not bind the next President without Congressional approval, blasts President Hussein Obama's reaction to the Israeli election, and threatens Congressional action against any UN agency that opposes Israel.
Okay, the face is not Obama (and I have no intention of comparing Obama to the person whose face and voice are in the video). But the words... definitely could be Obama's.
True colors: Sore loser Obama taking revenge against Israel
Barack Hussein Obama has gone ballistic against Israel, saying that he will use the United Nations (Hat Tip: Memeorandum) to pressure the Jewish state to self-destruct, and prompting Prime Minister Netanyahu to walk back comments (Hat Tip: Memeorandum) he made the day before the election about being opposed to a 'Palestinian state.' This is from the first link.
Angered by Netanyahu’s hard-line platform toward the Palestinians, top
Obama officials would not rule out the possibility of a change in
American posture at the United Nations, where the U.S. has historically
fended off resolutions hostile to Israel.
And despite signals from Israel suggesting that Netanyahu might walk
back his rejection, late in the campaign, of a Palestinian state under
his watch, Obama officials say they are taking him at his word.
“The positions taken by the prime minister in the last days
of the campaign have raised very significant substantive questions that
go far beyond just optics,” said a senior administration official,
adding that recent Israeli government actions were in keeping with
Netanyahu’s rhetoric.
While saying it was “premature” to discuss
Washington’s policy response, the official wouldn’t rule out a modified
American posture at the United Nations, where the U.S. has long fended
off resolutions criticizing Israeli settlement activity and demanding
its withdrawal from Palestinian territories.
“We are signaling
that if the Israeli government’s position is no longer to pursue a
Palestinian state, we’re going to have to broaden the spectrum of
options we pursue going forward,” the official said.
Mr. Netanyahu said in an interview on MSNBC
that he still wanted “a sustainable, peaceful two-state solution” to
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and that he had not intended to reverse
the position he took endorsing that in a 2009 speech at Bar-Ilan
University. But he said the Palestinian leadership’s refusal to
recognize Israel as a Jewish state, and its pact with the militant
Islamist Hamas movement, made that impossible right now.
“I haven’t changed my policy,” Mr. Netanyahu said in the interview, his first since his resounding victory on Tuesday, which handed him a fourth term. “What has changed is the reality.”
“I don’t want a one-state solution; I want a sustainable, peaceful
two-state solution, but for that, circumstances have to change,” he
added. “I was talking about what is achievable and what is not
achievable. To make it achievable, then you have to have real
negotiations with people who are committed to peace.”
His description of the reality is correct, but I think it's been that way all along. And whether or not Netanyahu intended to reverse the Bar Ilan speech remains to be seen. In the meantime, the Obama administration will seize Netanyahu's Tuesday comments as a way to do what Obama has wanted to do all along.
Jon Stewart took on Benjamin Netanyahu‘s victory in the Israeli
election, the U.S. media reaction to it, and the method by which the
Israeli right-wing government maintained its control of the state.
Showing
a series of clips from one particular cable news network, Stewart
demonstrated that a narrative has emerged that laments President Obama
having not called Netanyahu to congratulate him yet. “Really? You find
it interesting that a foreign country’s prime minister who came to
Congress against the White House’s wishes and shits on a nuclear deal
the president spent years working on, wouldn’t receive an immediate
post-election atta boy!” Stewart mocked. “Really?!”
Of course,
Stewart noted how many in the media never believed Netanyahu would pull
out the victory after reportedly appealing “directly to the extreme
right in the spectrum.” And in regards to Netanyahu’s public claim that
his opponents were bussing in minority Arabs to vote against the Likud
party, the Daily Show host snarked back: “How dare you! How dare you gin
up racist fears of minority turnout for short-term political gain.
That’s our thing!”
It's almost impossible for me to post because I still cannot access this account on my laptop - only on my phone. This situation will continue until late Thursday afternoon Israel time. So I guess I won't even miss the WiFi on the way home.
Two comments on today's election. First, I can't vote. Israel doesn't allow absentee ballots and I happen to agree with that. Too great a chance of ex-pats throwing the elections.
Second, don't believe the polls. Israelis constantly lie to pollsters. If you knew how often they call us, you'd understand why. On top of that, there are certain groups in society who are grossly under-represented in the polls. In 2013 and 1996 (to name two recent examples), the polls were way off.
Finally, if you're addicted to following me, there's always Twitter at least until Thursday. My user name there is @IsraelMatzav.
I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com