Powered by WebAds

Sunday, November 03, 2013

Steinitz: Bennett signed on 'Palestinian' terrorists' release, Netanyahu would not have gone forward without him

In a shocking interview with Israel's Channel 2 on Saturday night, Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steniitz said that Jewish Home party leader Naftali Bennett approved the release of 'Palestinian' terrorists as part of the 'peace process' and that Prime Minister Netanyahu would not have undertaken the terrorists' release without Bennett on board.

Speaking on Channel 2's "Meet the Press" about Bennett's vocal opposition to the release of 26 Palestinian prisoners last week, Steinitz said: "Netanyahu told Kerry, 'I cannot give you a final answer as long as I do not have agreement on this process from all members of my coalition. This is a large and significant process, I need to speak to Naftali Bennett.' It was very clear that Netanyahu told Kerry that he would not go forward without a green light from Bennett."

Ahead of Kerry's visit to Israel this week, it appears that the storm surrounding the prisoner release last week demonstrated to the U.S. how sensitive and complex the issue was and the degree of opposition from within the government and Israeli society to the release of more Palestinian prisoners.

Steinitz went on to say: "I understood that we all saw eye-to-eye. No one was excited about the release of terrorists, but it was clear to everyone that a settlement freeze would be even more difficult."

"Prime Minister Netanyahu said things clearly and precisely, [and the words of Bennett and Habayit Hayehudi] were imprecise understatements," he went on to say. "Habayit Hayehudi was in the wrong about the subject. I am sure that at the end of the day, Bennett understands this week that he was mistaken in his delayed opposition to the problematic proceedings. You cannot act in favor while feeling opposed. In any case, after a government decision has been made, you cannot come out against it. I have no doubt that there was agreement to the process. Even if there was a feeling of discomfort shared between all of us, there was an agreement in advance of the process."
While this is entirely plausible, I have pointed out before that other parties in and out of the coalition may have an interest in turning this issue into the 'settlers' v. the rest of the country, and that Bennett's party more than any other symbolizes the 'settlers.' But that doesn't change the fact that it's entirely possible that Bennett went along with this, and if he did he's a fool and a political neophyte. Anyone could have seen how this would play out.

And Bennett's response?
Bennett's office responded: "Minister Bennett was among the only ministers to oppose the prisoner release and he voted against the release in the government. With that, when the plan was presented, he clarified that he would oppose but not resign from the coalition." An official from Habayit Hayehudi commented, saying, "Steinitz, who voted in favor of the prisoner release, is better off not preaching to Bennett, who voted against the release."
In this country's coalition politics, it's very common that someone will vote against something to keep their voters happy because 'my vote won't matter anyway.' A vote in favor by Bennett in the cabinet would not have made a difference (the terrorist release passed by something like 21-7) but many of those 21 may only have gone along because they knew that Bennett, as self-proclaimed representative of the 'settlers,' agreed.

Labels: , , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google