Powered by WebAds

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Israel won't let the window to strike Iran close

It's amazing to see how blind most of the world is to the kind of calculus that is going on in this country right now. David Makovsky has a solid analysis of what Defense Minister Ehud Barak was trying to tell the world in his CNN interview this past Sunday, and of how the timidity of well-intentioned allies such as the United States is leading Israel to the point of no return on striking Iran, probably before the US election.
Whether or not Iran is able to produce a nuclear weapon in the coming years, Barak argued, the regime's efforts to disperse and fortify its facilities mean that attempted strikes against them are unlikely to have the desired impact after next year. As he explained, "It's true that it won't take three years -- probably three quarters [of a year] -- before no one can do anything practically about it because the Iranians are gradually, deliberately entering into what I call a zone of immunity, by widening the redundancy of their plan, making it spread over many more sites." When pointedly asked about the date at which a strike becomes impossible, he replied, "I cannot tell you for sure, nor can I predict whether it's two quarters or three quarters [of a year]. But it's not two or three years." Yet he refused to answer direct questions about an Israeli strike, insisting that such a subject should not be discussed on television.

Barak has repeatedly made clear in the past that inaction now guarantees inaction later, since a nuclear Iran would be as untouchable as nuclear North Korea is today. From this perspective, a nuclear Iran would profoundly change the balance of power in the Middle East, intimidating moderate forces and unleashing a regional arms race that could even proliferate nuclear technology to nonstate actors.

If Barak is to be believed, little time remains for sanctions to have the necessary effect. Indeed, the potency and timing of new sanctions are inversely related to the probability of an Israeli military strike. Israel will presumably try to determine whether the latest sanctions are likely to succeed before it loses its ability to attack. And if the window for a strike will close by next fall, waiting until late 2012 to impose even tougher sanctions would already be too late for Israel.

Although there is wide agreement in Israeli decisionmaking circles that sanctions are preferable to a military strike, and that they are better led by the United States in its capacity as a superpower, many Israelis also fear that their allies will eventually abandon them on this issue. And their fears are reinforced when U.S. officials such as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta comment on the inadvisability of a strike. These comments may therefore have the opposite effect than intended, convincing Israel that no one will come to its aid and that it has no other choice but to attack.
Read the whole thing. He's got it right.

Labels: , , ,

3 Comments:

At 3:11 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Carl.

The fact that the UAE is rushing to bypass Hormuz with new pipeline project could mean that they also still think an attack is pending?An industry source said. “Oil could flow through the pipeline from end-December initially at 1 million bpd and gradually increase to 2 million bpd.

Hmmm.....Merry Christmas Ahmoud?

 
At 12:20 PM, Blogger Chrysler 300M said...

destroy Khamenei and the rest of the leadership, Army, Guards, Party, Mullahs

 
At 1:42 PM, Blogger Juniper in the Desert said...

I love your phrase, "well-intentioned allies such as the United States.. "
You cannot be serious??

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google