Powered by WebAds

Friday, February 04, 2011

Confirmed: Muslim Brotherhood will abrogate Camp David treaty

There are still people out there who believe that if the Muslim Brotherhood takes control in Egypt, they will become moderate and reasonable. Those people believe that the Brotherhood will not do something outrageous like abrogate the Camp David treaty that has been in effect between Egypt and Israel for more than thirty years. Those people are engaging in wishful thinking.
Egypt's banned Muslim Brotherhood movement has unveiled its plans to scrap a peace treaty with Israel if it comes to power, a deputy leader said in an interview with NHK TV.

Rashad al-Bayoumi said the peace treaty with Israel will be abolished after a provisional government is formed by the movement and other Egypt's opposition parties.

"After President Mubarak steps down and a provisional government is formed, there is a need to dissolve the peace treaty with Israel," al-Bayoumi said.
And how exactly will the Brotherhood go about doing that? Another Muslim Brotherhood leader explains.
Now a leading Brotherhood figure, former spokesman Doctor Kamel Helbaoui, explains how they will get out of it. It is also a good example of how they avoid embarassing questions, and usually get away with it. Clearly, Brotherhood leaders have been warned to avoid extremist statements as it tries to sell itself to the Western audience and (insert adjective) media as moderate and cuddly.

In an interview on French television, he says (1:40-2:12 on the show):

Interviewer: "And would you revoke the peace treaty with Israel?"
Answer: "We respect all protocols and the treaties built on justice.
Interviewer: "Sorry, I didn't understand your response."
Answer: "We respect every treaty and every protocol for peace, but it should be built on justice.
Interviewer: "Does that mean you would keep the peace treaty with Israel?
Answer: "You keep it, but you have to review it in [unclear] of the atrocities from either side."
Interviewer: "What do you mean by that?"
Answer: "I mean that we don't need injustice to reach the people. If the peace treaty does not give the people their rights, it is not a good treaty, is not a good peace accord."
Interviewer: "So are you saying that the current peace treaty is not good enough?"
Answer: "No, it is not good enough. I must say that."
Interviewer: "So you would revoke that peace treaty.
Answer: "No, I didn't say that. You would change it. It could be reviewed, it could be reviewed in view of respect of human rights. And through the United Nations, through freedom given to the people, respect of every one. Not occupation and the military atrocities against civilians."

So while trying to avoid admitting it, he explains that Egypt would demand changes and not accept the existing treaty. But what you also have to know--and most journalists would miss--is that the Muslim Brotherhood regards Israel's existence as "occupation" and the denial of Muslim rights.

Paradoxically, then, the only way Israel could have a peace treaty with Egypt is not to exist at all.

Other Brotherhood spokesmen have said that if the group comes to power there will be a referendum on the treaty, and of course it will be rejected. This has been said many times in Arabic though the Western media seem completely unaware of it, as with many other things about the Brotherhood.

You have to understand the bizarre situation here. Every speech in Arabic of Brotherhood leaders and cadre and articles in their publications are full of anti-Jewish hatred, anti-American hatred, and support for violence. Yet in the Western media all of this simply is never mentioned, in part because reporters take the group's word on its credentials.
What could go wrong?

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

At 6:56 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

There is no doubt this will happen in the future.

Israel has better be prepared to deal with an Egypt from which even the pretense of having cold but correct relations with it are gone.

 
At 12:57 PM, Blogger Sparky the Wonder Dog said...

see http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/omri-ceren/388902#more-388902

Israel has accepted a strategy of negotiating peace with autocratic governments that, rather than prepare their societies for peace with Israel, actually use anti-Israel and anti-Semitic agitation as deliberate safety valves for internal discontent--so the best bargain Israel can get is the regimes policing today's terrorists while they create tomorrow's. (This is even optimistic as Arafat mobilized today's). Well, for Egypt, tomorrow could be today.

 
At 5:54 PM, Blogger joe six-pack said...

"Paradoxically, then, the only way Israel could have a peace treaty with Egypt is not to exist at all."

Exactly! This is only one of the issues at the root cause of the war.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Google