Powered by WebAds

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Bolton: Lebanon even more urgent than Egypt

Former American ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton says that Lebanon is even more crucial than Egypt to determining whether there will be democracy in the Middle East.
Rescuing Lebanon from radicals and terrorists will require strong action, noticeably absent in recent U.S. policy. We can no longer pretend that the special tribunal's existence is an adequate response to the real problem in Lebanon: Tehran's long-standing drive for regional hegemony. It was always a mistake to confuse the effectiveness of an international criminal court with courts of real constitutional governments, and harmfully naive to think that the special tribunal could operate in a vacuum, as the events in Lebanon make painfully clear.

Of course, Hezbollah's toppling of the Lebanese government is just the latest of its cancerous efforts in its home base. And it remains a continuing threat to innocent civilians in Israel, to other Arab governments in the Middle East and increasingly to other nations around the globe.

...

The West must insist on enforcing the Security Council resolutions in support of Lebanese sovereignty and peaceful, representative government, or stop engaging in meaningless gestures. This is our last opportunity before Hezbollah's armed capabilities swallow democracy in Lebanon, perhaps permanently, and dramatically increase the risk of renewed hostilities throughout the region.

President Obama's reaction is crucial. Unlike Washington's repeated prior failures, we must refuse to recognize any Hezbollah-dominated government as legitimate, at least until Hezbollah fully disarms and becomes a real political party. This may well mean committing to more than an impotent U.N. peacekeeping force in Lebanon. Hezbollah's 1983 bombings of U.S. and French forces in Beirut caused their withdrawal, a rare failure of will by then-President Reagan, leading to today's crisis. We stand aside again at our peril.

The White House has been obsessed for two years with pressuring Israel to make concessions to Palestinians instead of focusing on the manifestations of Iran's menace. Perhaps the humiliation of Hezbollah's collapsing of Saad Hariri's government as Hariri was meeting in the Oval Office will help spur Obama into meaningful action. If not, the lights will be going out in Lebanon for a long time to come, with devastating consequences in the broader Middle East.
I'm afraid that the lights are out already. The US has very little leverage in Lebanon. It doesn't provide massive amounts of aid, so the threat to cut that aid off is pretty empty. And while Bolton hints at how the US could make a difference - by committing to more an impotent UN peacekeeping force by sending troops - I highly doubt that the Obama administration is going to be the one to send US troops to Lebanon again.

What could go wrong?

Labels: , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

At 4:51 PM, Blogger Yishai said...

Amen, brother. Dudes start ridin' in with camels, and y'all suddenly forget a terrorist takeover of a sovereign nation?

 
At 7:18 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Fat chance of that happening.

The West has more or less made peace with a Hezbollah-run Lebanon.

It appears set to do the same with a MB-led Egypt.

The only country caught between the jaws of two Islamist regimes is Israel. And when the crocodile would feast on the Jews, don't expect the world to come to Israel's rescue.

What could go wrong indeed

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google