One for you and one for me: Central Elections Committee bans Zoabi, Marzel
The Central Elections Committee has voted to ban 'Israeli Arab' MK Hanin Zoabi and Rightist candidate Baruch Marzel. The vote to ban Zoabi wasn't even close - 27-6. The
vote to ban Marzel was much closer 17-16. Zoabi's ban is
likely to be overturned by Israel's Leftist 'Supreme Court.'
Zoabi said following the vote that the High Court would "have its say,"
on the decision. "I did not have high expectations that most of the
members of the Elections Committee would follow the fundamental rules of
democracy that they are bound by. This is a political committee in a
Knesset that has a majority of right-wingers and racists," she said.
"There
is no legitimate, legal basis to disqualify me, as was made clear by
the attorney-general and previous High Court decisions on attempts to
unseat me as a representative of the Arab public," she added.
Foreign
Minister Avigdor Liberman, whose Yisrael Beytenu party initiated the
petition, said after the decision that Zoabi's place was clearly not in
the Knesset, but rather with the "Hamas terrorists in Gaza."
Liberman said he hoped the High Court would not allow a "supporter of terrorists, including those on the Mavi Marmara to run in Knesset elections in the Jewish state."
Central
Election Committee chairman and Attorney-General Yehuda Weinstein both
came out against the move, arguing that such disqualifications
undesirably get the High Court involved in the political process.
However, Likud, Bayit Yehudi, Yisrael Beytenu, Shas, Yachad and the
Zionist Union supported disqualifying Zoabi.
Israel's 'Supreme Court' has nothing against terror supporters, and Zoabi is likely to be reinstated.
Oh, and by the way, the Chairman of the Central Election Committee is a retired Israeli Arab Supreme Court judge (Salim Jubran) who
has said that he could never sing our national anthem.
What could go wrong?
Labels: Baruch Marzel, Hanin Zoabi, Hatikva, Knesset elections 2015, Salim Jubran
Knesset Law Committee Chairman calls for removal of 'Israeli Arab' judge who would not sing national anthem
Knesset Law Committee Chairman David Rotem has called for the removal of 'Israeli Arab' Supreme Court Justice Salim Joubran after Joubran
refused to participate in singing Israel's National Anthem at the conclusion of the installation ceremony for new Supreme Court Chief Justice Asher Grunis. Joubran's silence was shown on live television by Israel's Channel 2 (I have not found the video yet) according to Israel Radio.
A number of MKs from the right wing spoke out against Joubran’s silence during the swearing in of new Supreme Court President Asher Grunis, with Likud’s Tzipi Hotovely saying that such actions are what cause the Supreme Court to lose its status in the eyes of the public.
Yisrael Beiteinu MK David Rotem, who heads the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, said he would turn to Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman and act to remove Joubran from his chair.
Earlier in the year, MK Michael Ben-Ari pushed to legislate a law which would make army or national service a mandatory criteria for being appointed as a judge in the Supreme Court.
The law was nicknamed the “Joubran law,” and Ben-Ari said on Tuesday evening that Joubran’s silence during the anthem was proof of its necessity. “Who ever doesn’t like the anthem can leave,” he said. “I promise I won’t beg him to stay.”
Rabbi Meir Kahane
warned that this would happen. But no one wanted to listen. Instead, Kahane was branded a racist and a terrorist. And Joubran is not a racist?
Labels: Hatikva, Salim Jubran, Supreme Court
Court orders Jews expelled from Migron
For the first time ever, an Israeli court has ordered a Jewish town 'dismantled' and its
inhabitants expelled. On Tuesday, the court ordered the destruction of the town of Migron - right off highway 60 - by March 2012.
The ruling, given unanimously by Supreme Court Justice Dorit Beinisch, Justice Miriam Naor and Justice Salim Joubran, noted that the West Bank outpost was built without government permission, illegally and on private land owned by Palestinians. The outpost, located in the Binyamin region of the West Bank 5 km. north of Jerusalem, was first constructed over a decade ago, with NIS 4.3 million from the Ministry of Construction and Housing, but without the proper authorization.
In her 2005 report, Talia Sasson said the outpost was constructed on private Palestinian property, a designation which since has been accepted by the state.
Peace Now first petitioned the High Court to evacuate Migron in 2006, on behalf of Palestinians with claims to the property.
The state agreed in principle to evacuate the outpost, but has yet to make good on that pledge.
The matter has returned to court a number of times with the state requesting more time to come up with a plan to evacuate the outpost and rehouse its residents.
In Tuesday's ruling, the Justices remarked that the High Court had acceded to repeated requests by the state to be allowed additional time to deal with the outpost, in order to "allow dialog and come to a mutual agreement over a solution".
The Justices noted that a total of five hearings had been held, in which various plans were discussed regarding the evacuation of the West Bank outpost, which the state does not dispute is illegal.
In 2008, the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip struck a deal with the government, in which it promised that Migron would be voluntarily removed to the nearby settlement of Geva Binyamin (Adam) within two years.
However, in July's hearing the High Court learned that plans to evacuate Migron residents to Adam were not progressing at a reasonable pace, and that the chances of that plan being a success still in doubt, not least because Migron residents themselves had not agreed to relocate.
In Tuesday's ruling, the Justices slammed the state for failing to draw up a reasonable schedule for evacuating Migron to the nearby Adam settlement, despite repeated court hearings to discuss the matter and repeated requests by the state to be granted extensions to implement the plan.
The Justices also noted that the state had not negotiated directly with Migron residents to gain approval for the plan, but had done so through the Yesha Council, and that Migron residents had not expressed their agreement to the plan to move them to Adam.
"The residents of Migron have so far refrained from responding or presenting themselves for a hearing before us and have also refrained from making any statement that transferring them to the new neighborhood in Adam is acceptable to them - and the state has not asked them to make such a statement," wrote the Justices.
The fact that three years had passed without agreement since the plan was originally raised "indicates that it will not come to fruition in the forseeable future," the Justices added.
With the Adam relocation plan in doubt even three years after it was first suggested, the Justices wrote, "there is no justification to preserve the illegal situation and to continue to violate Palestinian residents' property rights."
If they don't reach an agreement with the Migron residents, I suspect that they are going to have a little trouble finding someone to enforce an expulsion order. Unless Defense Minister Ehud Barak is willing to call in the Yassamnikim (SWAT team), which are largely 'minorities' (Arabs and Bedouin), I have my doubts the expulsion order can be enforced. Prime Minister Netanyahu's government will not be happy calling in the Yasamnikim. And as
President Jackson remarked in 1832, "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!";[119].
Heh.
Labels: Dorit Beinish, Migron, Miriam Naor, Salim Jubran, Supreme Court
