I'm sure that many of you recall the story of the 'Palestinian' director on his way to the Oscars, who was 'held' by immigration authorities at Los Angeles International Airport, all as excruciatingly tweeted by Michael Moore. I'm sure you'll all be shocked to hear that Moore just might have been lying.
But while there is nothing in the log to contradict Burnat's account
or his gratitude to Moore for leaping to his aid, the document does
suggest that Moore overstated, at least, the length of the incident. The
filmmaker's tweets originally drew complaints from an airport official
that Moore was overhyping a routine, and relatively brief, incident.
That account, in turn, prompted Moore to accuse BuzzFeed (and presumably
the source) of dishonesty.
Airport officials Tuesday agreed to
show BuzzFeed the agency's log from February 19, whose timeline appears
to confirm the original source's claim.
According to the log, which is kept in the secondary inspection area at LAX's Tom Bradley International Terminal:
5:28pm: Burnat was referred to secondary inspection 5:30pm: Burnat was admitted to secondary inspection 5:53pm: Burnat was released from secondary inspection
Officials
at LAX made the logbook available and five officials spoke to BuzzFeed
on the condition of anonymity, citing a policy against discussing
individual cases. (A spokesman for Customs and Border Protection
declined to comment on the incident.)
As I'm sure many of you heard already, Iran's FARS news covered up a picture of Michelle Obama at the Oscar's (picture from here). Unfortunately, they didn't cover her with a niqab, which would have covered her face.
They also couldn't cover up the dress' $9,000 price tag, which was borne by the American taxpayer (Hat Tip: Bad Blue).
Oscars segment jokes about how Jews control Hollywood
A disgusting segment at Sunday night's Academy awards left two billion people watching with the impression that Jews control Hollywood. It's in the last minute and a half of this clip.
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) on Monday
derided as “offensive and not remotely funny” the segment, saying it was
“sad and disheartening that the awards show sought to use age-old,
anti-Jewish stereotypes for laughs.”
“For the insiders at the Oscars this kind of
joke is obviously not taken seriously,” the ADL said in a statement.
“But when one considers the global audience of the Oscars of upwards of
two billion people, including many who know little or nothing about
Hollywood or the falsity of such Jewish stereotypes, there’s a much
higher potential for the ‘Jews control Hollywood’ myth to be accepted as
fact.”
Indeed. Imagine if they had made the same kind of jokes about blacks or gays or Muslims. No one - not even the Times of Israel - would try to excuse them.
5 Broken Cameras and The Gatekeepers' loss at the Academy Awards was no loss for Israel, Bayit Yehudi MKs said on Monday morning.
"The Israeli film, the anti-Israel 5 Broken Cameras did not win the Oscar. I did not shed a tear," Bayit Yehudi leader Naftali Bennett wrote on Facebook.
MK
Uri Orbach (Bayit Yehudi) took to the social network to write a
sarcastic message: "Make a face like you're disappointed that the two
documentary films that 'represent Israel' didn't win the Oscar for Best
Documentary. Oy, so unfortunate."
...
MK Ayelet Shaked (Bayit Yehudi) expressed support for a campaign by reservists who are considering suing the creators of 5 Broken Cameras for libel.
After appearing on a Channel 10 talk show together with a reservist who served in Bil'in, Shaked called the soldier a hero.
"The whole studio was full of pride when he spoke," she stated. "The truth will win over those trying to twist it."
A group called Consensus: Guardians of the IDF Spirit, an NGO meant to counter anti-IDF attacks in the media has posted a video to YouTube that spoofs 5 Broken Cameras, as
well as Waltz with Bashir and Beaufort, Israeli films that were nominated in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Let's go to the videotape (sorry, Hebrew only).
Meanwhile, The Gatekeepers, which features interviews with the last six directors general of the General Security Service, is panned for being dishonest.
However, the film repeatedly ignores
history and context. It blames Israel for the Palestinian hostility and
violence that occurred after 1967, when Israel began administering the
West Bank.
The viewer never learns from the film that terrorism against Jews and
Israelis was not a result of Israel’s administration but rather has
been a regular feature of life since pre-state days.
Palestinian Arabs murdered over 1,000 Jews between 1920 and 1967, and
they ethnically cleansed all Jewish communities from the areas they
captured during the 1948 war, including the West Bank, Gaza and eastern
Jerusalem. The pattern of terrorism simply continued after Israel’s
victory in its 1967 defensive war. Yasser Arafat organized 61 Fatah
military operations from the West Bank in the few months after the war,
and 162 Israelis were killed by terrorists between 1968 and 1970.
Visually and verbally, the film portrays Israel as a heartless
occupier. Audiences get no information about how harsh life was for
Palestinians under Egyptian and Jordanian rule between 1948 and 1967,
with rampant childhood diseases, economic stagnation and restricted
civil and political rights. In addition, the documentary completely
overlooks the big picture of positive Israeli-Palestinian relations
after 1967.
Even as Israel sought to stop terrorists, it also instituted
Palestinian municipal self-government and administration, introduced
freedom of speech and association, and vastly modernized the Palestinian
economy as well as Palestinian health, welfare and education, turning
the West Bank and Gaza into the world’s fourth fastest growing economy
in the 1970s and 1980s.
In line with his political agenda, Moreh tries to paint all religious
Israelis, settlers and right-of-center parties as extremist and
intransigent.
That article, however, goes on to give a very simplistic view of the so-called Jewish Underground. The Jewish Underground was not just a 'group of extremists from Hebron' as the article would have you believe, and most of the people who were eventually arrested and imprisoned for being part of the 'Underground' had nothing to do with a plot to blow up the mosques on the Temple Mount. Anyone whose name came up in the interrogation of the 'Jewish Underground' (which used many of the same methods that are used with 'Palestinian terrorists') was charged with being a member of a terrorist organization.
While the critique of the movie is correct, the critique of the 'Jewish Underground' has been colored too much by what the General Security Service heads said about it in the very same movie. We don't believe what the movie says about the 'Palestinians.' Why believe what it says about the Jews?
'Palestinian' filmmaker held by immigration at LAX
A 'Palestinian' filmmaker arriving in Los Angeles to attend the Oscar Awards ceremony was held by United States immigration officials at Los Angeles' Tom Bradley International Airport for about an hour and a half on Tuesday night. Here are some tweets from Leftist Hollywood icon Michael Moore.
Emad Burnat, Palestinian director of Oscar nominated "5 Broken Cameras" was held tonight by immigration at LAX as he landed to attend Oscars
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
Emad, his wife & 8-yr old son were placed in a holding area and told they didn't have the proper invitation on them to attend the Oscars.
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
Apparently the Immigration & Customs officers couldn't understand how a Palestinian could be an Oscar nominee. Emad texted me for help.
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
Yeah, that must be it.
I called Academy officials who called lawyers. I told Emad to give the officers my phone # and to say my name a couple of times.
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
You mean the ICE officials didn't know who Moore was? I'm shocked....
After 1.5 hrs, they decided to release him & his family & told him he could stay in LA for the week & go to the Oscars. Welcome to America.
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
"It's nothing I'm not already used to," he told me later. "When u live under occupation, with no rights, this is a daily occurrence."
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
Emad Burnat, Palestinian farmer turned filmmaker, director of "5 Broken Cameras", the 1st Palestinian doc ever nominated for the Oscar.
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
This all just happened tonight, a few hours ago. He was certain they were going to deport him. But not if I had anything to do about it.
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) February 20, 2013
Oscar-winning American documentary filmmaker Michael Moore has taken to
Twitter to express his dissatisfaction with immigration officials at LAX
airport in Los Angeles, after they allegedly threatened to send fellow
filmmaker Emad Burnat, "back to Palestine."
Burnat had been
visiting LA to attend the 85th Annual Academy Awards. He had been
nominated in the category of Best Documentary for his film "5 Broken
Cameras."
"5 Broken Cameras" documents the first years of life
for Burnat's baby against the backdrop of the West Bank village of
Bil'in's battle against the Israeli security fence. Five of Burnat's
cameras were smashed by the Israeli army as he documented friends and
family members being shot and injured by Israeli troops. The film won
the documentary director's award this year at the Sundance Film
Festival.
According to Moore, once Burnat presented the authorities with his invitation to
the 85th Annual Academy Awards, he was told that his official Oscars
invitation wasn't "proper". Moore then tweeted the entire incident as relayed to him by Burnat.
5 Broken Cameras is one of two anti-Israel films nominated in the 'documentary' category. I hope neither of them win.
ROTFL: Iran boycotting Oscars due to Academy's failure to condemn Innocence of Muslims
Well, I'm sure they'll be sorely missed. Iran has announced that it will boycott the upcoming Academy Awards over the Academy's failure to condemn Innocence of Muslims. (The source for this report is al-Reuters, which might be why they seem to be taking it so seriously).
Despite tough censorship and the repression of leading film makers,
Iranian art cinema has earned international acclaim over the past 20
years. Asghar Farhadi's "A Separation" won the Oscar for best foreign
language film in February, the first Iranian film to do so.
Culture
and Islamic Guidance Minister Mohammad Hosseini said Iran would boycott
the next Academy Awards "to protest against the making of a film
insulting the Prophet and because of the organizers' failure to take an
official position (against the film)," the Iranian Students' News Agency
reported.
He also urged other Islamic countries to boycott the Oscars.
...
"The position that Western politicians have adopted on these great
insults are no different from a position of enmity," Iranian media
quoted Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as saying on Monday.
Israelis have been flocking to see the Iranian academy award winning film - everyone has to show how cool they are. But of course, the Israeli entry into the prize competition won't be seen anywhere in Iran.
So let’s start with the obvious: “Undemocratic” countries don’t show films produced by their worst enemies in theaters throughout the country; they ban them. You won’t, for instance, be able to see “Footnote” at a movie theater in Tehran. That this even needs saying is a disgrace. But given the frequency with which Israel’s critics have been hurling the “undemocratic” label at it, it’s clear many self-proclaimed Western liberals need a refresher course in the basics of democracy.
What’s equally true, however, is that “anti-peace” regimes generally don’t want their citizens to learn about their neighbors’ culture, for very good reason: If a regime really seeks to prevent peace, dehumanization of the enemy is vital. Thus, it’s important to shield the public from anything that might cause it to view enemy nationals as people more or less like themselves. That’s precisely why, for instance, Israeli books are almost never translated into Arabic, nor are Israeli movies shown almost anywhere in the Arab world.
In contrast, a country that seeks peace is intensely interested in getting to know its neighbors’ human side, because humanization enhances the prospects for peace. That is why, for instance, you can easily find translated Arabic literature in Israel, and it’s also why “A Separation” has been such a hit. It’s not just that it’s an award-winning movie, though that obviously helps. It’s because Israelis, to quote AP again, were intrigued “by the rare glimpse it offered into the living rooms of a country they regard as a threat.”
"Footnote," the story of the rivalry between two Talmudic scholars who are also father and son, was the second Academy Awards entry for Cedar, 43, a New York native who now lives in Tel Aviv. “Beaufort,” his film about the first Lebanon War, lost its bid in 2007.
Others vying in the best foreign-language film category included “In Darkness,” by Poland’s Agnieszka Holland, which follows the fate of a dozen Jewish men, women and children who hid for 14 months in the underground sewers of Lvov during the Nazi occupation of Poland. Also, “Bullhead” by Belgium’s Michael Roskam, and "Monsieur Lazhar” by Canada’s Philippe Falardeau.
At the Cannes Film Festival, "Footnote" was awarded the top prize for best screenplay, and in the United States the National Board of Reviews of Motion Pictures placed the film among the five top foreign-language features.
Cedar's first two films, "Time of Favor” and “Campfire,” also were chosen as Israel's entries to the Academy Awards but did not make the finals. They explored the gulf between observant and secular Israelis.
Okay, so let's watch the trailer of A Separation. Let's go to the videotape.
The groundbreaking success of "A Separation," which tells the story of a failing marriage, was cast mostly in nationalist terms by Iranian authorities amid a mounting showdown between Israel and its Western allies over Tehran's disputed nuclear program.
Yet the high-profile attention by Iran's Islamic leadership also represents a rare stamp of approval on the country's movie industry, which collects awards and accolades worldwide but is often dismissed by hard-liners at home as dominated by Western-tainted liberals and political dissenters.
...
Javad Shamaghdari, head of Iran's Cinematic Agency, portrayed the Oscar decision as the "beginning of the collapse" of Israeli influence that "beats the drum of war" in the U.S.
In Israel, however, the film has been a hit despite the daily headlines in Israeli newspapers warning of the Iranian nuclear threat.
"It's very well acted, exceptionally well written and very moving," said Yair Raveh, film critic for Israel's leading entertainment magazine, Pnai Plus. "Ultimately you don't think about nuclear bombs or dictators threatening world peace. You see them driving cars and going to movies and they look exactly like us."
The local favorite was still Israel's Oscar contender, Joseph Cedar's "Footnote," a Talmudic scholar saga. But their interest in "A Separation" was piqued by the rare glimpse it offered into the living rooms of a country they regard as a threat to their very survival.
During the two-hour panel discussion, Cedar and Farhadi did not speak to each other directly, but joined their colleagues in chuckling at each other’s jokes and politely applauding their respective remarks.
The same applied when Holland discussed her film about a dozen Jews hiding in underground sewers during the Nazi occupation of Poland, a theme directly contradicting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s insistence that the Holocaust never happened.
All the panelists used hand-held microphones except for Cedar, whose stationery mike was fastened to the armrest of his chair, because of the Jewish Sabbath.
The symposium is always held on Saturday preceding the Sunday Academy Awards and Cedar, who is a Shabbat observer, walked two miles from his hotel to the theater.
In 2007, when Cedar’s war film “Beaufort” also was among the five finalists, he consulted his rabbi and was told that he could not use a mike during the symposium. As a result, only those in the first few rows could hear his remarks. This time Cedar consulted a different authority, who advised that the director could speak into a mike, as long as he did not actually hold it in his hand.
I wonder what the Iranian authorities will think of the panel. I also wonder when the Israeli movie will be shown in Tehran like the Iranian movie is shown in Jerusalem. Probably never.
For the fourth time in five years, an Israeli film has been nominated for Best Foreign Language film. And for the first time, it is not a film that apologizes for Israel's relations with either its Arab population or its neighbors.
The Israeli film "Footnote," up for an Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film this year, is Israel's fourth such nomination in the past five years, giving Israel more nominations during that period than any other country.
It's an indication to the renaissance of Israeli cinema, which has grown from a fledgling industry with poor cinematography and low box office sales to a darling of world film festivals. That's in spite — or perhaps because — of the country's troubled international reputation, due to its lengthy conflict with the Arab world.
The last three Israeli films that made it to the Oscar shortlist all mine the country's troubles with its Arab neighbors. "Beaufort," nominated in 2008, and "Waltz with Bashir," nominated a year after, both explored Israeli soldiers' experiences in Lebanon. "Ajami," the 2010 nominee, centers on Arab-Jewish tensions in a violence-ridden neighborhood near Tel Aviv.
This year's nomination went to an Israeli film featuring a more internal conflict — two professors of Talmud, a father and son, dueling for academic prestige and a coveted national prize.
"It's a badge of honor for Israel," said Moshe Edery, producer of "Footnote," at a news conference after the Oscar nomination. "It's Israel's best business card around the world, especially these days."
Here's the trailer. A summary follows.
Let's go to the videotape.
FOOTNOTE is the tale of a great rivalry between a father and son. Eliezer and Uriel Shkolnik are both eccentric professors, who have dedicated their lives to their work in Talmudic Studies. The father, Eliezer, is a stubborn purist who fears the establishment and has never been recognized for his work. While his son, Uriel, is an up-and-coming star in the field, who appears to feed on accolades, endlessly seeking recognition.
Then one day, the tables turn. When Eliezer learns that he is to be awarded the Israel Prize, the most valuable honor for scholarship in the country, his vanity and desperate need for validation are exposed. His son Uriel, meanwhile, is thrilled to see his father's achievements finally recognized but, in a darkly funny twist, is forced to choose between the advancement of his own career and his father's. Will he sabotage his father's glory?
FOOTNOTE is the story of insane academic competition, the dichotomy betweenadmiration and envy for a role model, and the very complicated relationship between a father and son.
I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com