Showdown coming over Hagel
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv) has set up a Friday showdown over the nomination of anti-Israel
Chuck Hagel to become the United States' next Secretary of Defense.
In an attempt to get Hagel installed as secretary of defense before next
week’s recess, the majority leader set up a Friday vote to cut off
debate, setting up a crucial 60-vote test. If Reid can find five
Republicans to join the 55 members of the Democratic Caucus, the Senate
could approve Hagel quickly — possibly Saturday or earlier.
But if he can’t, the White House could be forced to recalibrate its
strategy as the nomination drags out into late February. And that could
give the GOP more time to mount opposition to Hagel’s nomination, which
has been targeted because of the former Nebraska senator’s past comments
on Iran, Iraq and Israel and his shaky performance at his confirmation
hearings.
The Democrats are whining that this has never happened before.
Democrats are warning Republicans that the precedent they set by
forcing a cloture vote on the national security nominees — particularly
on Hagel — would come back to haunt them when a GOP president eventually
returns to the White House.
“This is the first time in the history of our country that a
presidential nominee for secretary of defense has been filibustered,”
Reid said on the floor. “What a shame, but that’s the way it is.”
But has any President ever sent up a nominee for a national security position who was so obviously incompetent, and whose sole qualification appeared to be his agreeing with the President's agenda?
If a Republican president nominated someone as anti-Israel and
borderline antisemitic as Hagel to Secretary of Defense--say, Pat
Buchanan--the press would rightly have a field day. But when President
Barack Obama does so, aided by self-interested politicians who proclaim
their abiding belief in the ties between the United States and Israel,
the press remains silent.
To recap: with his openly expressed negativity toward Jews and
Israel, Hagel is the most problematic candidate for a high post in an
administration in decades. Between his apparent willingness to
countenance accusations of Israeli “war crimes,” his support for
negotiations with Israel’s terrorist enemies, and his unwillingness to
express support for Israel in the face of Palestinian terrorism, Hagel’s
anti-Israel credentials are well in order. Add in Hagel’s attempt to
shut down the Sixth Fleet’s USO Center in Haifa (“Let the Jews pay for
it,” he spat), his scornful assertion that he is not the "Senator for
Israel," and his belief that the so-called "Jewish lobby" intimidates
members of Congress, and you’re looking at a bigot.
And yet the Democrats, including President Obama, continue to push
Hagel through. That’s no surprise from an administration that treats
Israel more harshly than it treats most of America’s enemies. But it is a
surprise from the Jewish members of the Democratic caucus, who should
know better--not because they have dual loyalties, not because they
represent a "lobby," but because Jewish politicians above all should
understand the importance of a safe and secure Israel.
But they don’t.
Take, for example, Senator Carl Levin (D-MI). Levin has been the
moving force behind the push for a vote on Hagel on Tuesday. Levin said
on Monday that Hagel had turned over enough documents, but had no
comment on Hagel’s antisemitic utterances and anti-Israel record. In
fact, Levin saved tried to save Hagel during his disastrous hearing,
failing to ask him a single question about Israel, even though he
acknowledged Hagel's "troubling" record. Yet Levin portrays himself as a
friend of Israel.
The same holds true for Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who originally
expressed concerns about Hagel’s nomination, but quickly fell into line
once President Obama made clear that he’d be sticking by his anti-Israel
man. All it took was a ninety-minute tête-a-tête with Hagel to convince
Schumer to abandon his pro-Israel principles and stand behind Hagel.
...
The list goes on of Jewish Democrats who obviously care less about
the security the State of Israel or fighting antisemitism than they do
about staying in Barack Obama’s good graces. From Senator Dianne
Feinstein to Senator Barbara Boxer, from Senator Frank Lautenberg to
Senator Al Franken, from Senator Bernie Sanders to Senator Benjamin
Cardin, not one liberal Jewish senator has expressed opposition to the
most anti-Israel Secretary of Defense nominee since George Marshall
tried to stop the recognition of Israel in 1948.
Given the lack of priority that non-committed American Jews place on Israel, is anyone really surprised?
Labels: American Jewish support for Israel, Barack Hussein Obama, Chuck Hagel, Harry Reid, National Democratic Party, United States Senate
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home