Obama to tell Netanyahu: Window for military action in Iran opens in June
Obama will come bearing the message that if diplomatic efforts and sanctions don’t bear fruit, Israel should “sit tight” and let Washington take the stage, even if that means remaining on the sidelines during a US military operation, Channel 10 reported. Netanyahu will be asked to refrain from any military action and keep a low profile, avoiding even the mention of a strike, the report said, citing unnamed officials.
In London Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry said an Iran with nuclear weapons was “simply unacceptable” and warned the time limit for a diplomatic solution was running out.“As we have repeatedly made clear, the window for a diplomatic solution simply cannot remain open forever,” said Kerry, on his first international tour as America’s top diplomat. “But it is open today. It is open now and there is still time, but there is only time if Iran makes the decision to come to the table and to negotiate in good faith.
Please note that there is nothing in this story that indicates it's a Purim tale. But let's hear anyone who actually believes that Obama is going to do this. I don't.“We are prepared to negotiate in good faith, in mutual respect, in an effort to avoid whatever terrible consequences could follow failure, and so the choice really is in the hands of the Iranians. And we hope they will make the right choice,” Kerry added.
Labels: Barack Hussein Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu, Iranian nuclear threat, US-Israel relationship
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 1:31 AM
2 Comments:
I don't either though with Obama and his cronies still embracing Linkage, however remote the following scenario is I also wouldn't put it past Obama to say one-day attack Iran while laying the groundwork in the meantime to force Israel into making “concessions”.
The rationale being that Israel is somehow in debt to Obama due to the latter stopping Iran and making out that only Israel was threatened by Iran, while deliberately omitting the fact that the Sunni / Arab countries along with Europe saw a nuclear Iran as a threat (with Israel being blamed for the war and the potential global aftermath).
One of the 'conditions' of the talks that are now being held was a 'less aggressive' attitude of the US, result he pulls all but one of his carriers to harbor (Making them the perfect target since Pearl Harbor).With one carrier to keep the strait of Hormuz open he practically gives them the 'go ahead' to close the strait.Now why would he do this?
Post a Comment
<< Home