Tel Aviv U simulates first 48 hours after Israeli attack on Iran
A Tel Aviv University think tank has simulated the first 48 hours after an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear weapons capability. The attack is undertaken solely by Israel. And get this - the attack is
presumed to take place on November 9, 2012 - three days after the US election. Hmmm.
The Tel Aviv University-based institute began the game with
the following “announcement”: “Al Jazeera reported that Israeli planes attacked
nuclear sites in Iran in three assault waves. Following the reports, Israel
officially announced it attacked nuclear sites in Iran, since it had no other
choice.”
In this scenario, the strike successfully destroyed nuclear
sites and set Iran’s nuclear weapons program back by three years.
As part
of the exercise, Iran responded with full force, firing some 200 Shihab missiles
at Israel in two waves, and calling on its proxies, Hezbollah, Hamas and other
radical organizations, to attack Israel. At first, Iran refrained from striking
US targets in the Persian Gulf region in the war game.
In the game,
Israel, bolstered by a successful strike, attempted to absorb the attacks while
trying to de-escalate the situation and reach an end to hostilities as soon as
possible.
The international community remained paralyzed due to Russia’s
attempts to exploit the situation to advance its strategic
interests.
“After two days, the Iranians, and to a lesser extent, their
allies, continue to attack Israel. The crisis did not appear to be approaching a
solution,” the INSS concluded at the end of the war game.
Within the
first 48 hours, Israel carried out a fourth air assault on Iran to complete the
destruction of a main nuclear site.
“Israel’s strategic aim was to
prevent a regional escalation and to strive to reach a level in which incidents
were under control, in low intensity, as quickly as possible,” the INSS
said.
Although the US was not notified in advance, Washington clearly
sided with Israel and did not expose divisions, in order to show a united front
and decrease the chances of a regional conflagration.
The US indicated
its willingness to return to the negotiating table with Iran and to ease
sanctions in exchange for Iranian restraint and an Iranian announcement that
nuclear military activities had ceased.
The US stayed out of the
fighting, based on a policy that it would only become involved if Iran were to
shut off the globally important oil route of the Strait of Hormuz, or if Iran
attacked US assets in the Gulf.
At first, Tehran shied away from a
military confrontation with the US, but, the game’s participants found, “The
more Iran was pushed into a corner and its options to act became limited, the
more it understood that its principal card is to act against the US in the Gulf
and to shut off the Strait of Hormuz,” the INSS said.
Want to know how Hezbullah and Hamas reacted?
Read the whole thing. The scenario sounds realistic except for the part about Obama (who will still be President on November 9 even if Romney wins the election) clearly siding with Israel.
Labels: Iranian nuclear threat, Israeli attack on Iran
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home