WaPo blames Abu Bluff for impasse
A Washington Post editorial says that Abu Mazen is more responsible for the impasse over 'negotiations' than Prime Minister Netanyahu (Hat Tip: Soccer Dad via Twitter).Of the two, the Palestinian stance is more objectionable, and not only because it prevents any process from going forward. By his own account, President Mahmoud Abbas’s hard-line stance on the settlement issue is unfounded: He has said more than once that he adopted it only because he felt obliged to match a similar demand by President Obama. Mr. Obama, however, has dropped that condition; and as the Palestinians know, the matter is purely symbolic — both sides agree that Israel will annex the Jerusalem neighborhoods and West Bank settlements where most of the building is going on. For example, during a previous round of negotiations, Mr. Abbas’s negotiators specifically agreed to Israeli annexation of the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo; yet an announcement of new construction there last week prompted theatrical denunciations by those same Palestinian officials, as well as criticism from the Quartet.They have Abu Mazen down pat. Too bad they didn't quite do the same for Netanyahu.
Mr. Abbas’s insistence on preconditions allows him to continue his separate campaign for recognition of Palestine by the United Nations: He is about to embark on a global tour in search of votes on the Security Council. His cynical obstructionism ought to be enough to persuade undecided governments, such as Colombia and Portugal, to withhold support — or at least to require that Mr. Abbas fully accept the Quartet’s initiative before they back his.
Labels: Abu Mazen, Binyamin Netanyahu, Palestinian intransigence, Washington Post
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 3:35 PM
1 Comments:
"..both sides agree that Israel will annex the Jerusalem neighborhoods and West Bank settlements where most of the building is going on.."
Folks go on about what "both sides" "agree" and what "everyone knows" and then they list some fact of life the Palestinians are refusing to agree to and refusing to know. What the Palestinians know, recognize, agree to is that their Palestinian state, not an Israeli state, should annex those neighborhoods and settlement blocks. Those so-called prior agreements were never agreed to and they are in the crapper.
Afterwards Jewish interests can be accommodated as they were in, say, Libya.
Post a Comment
<< Home