Powered by WebAds

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Pot calls kettle black

Former 'Palestinian' chief negotiator bottle washer Saeb Erekat takes the prize for chutzpa. Responding to reports that Israel may unilaterally abrogate the Oslo Accords if the 'Palestinians' unilaterally turn to the Security Council, Erekat, who represents an organization that never took a single step to fight terror despite it being the first and foremost obligation of both the Oslo Accords and the 'road map,' has the audacity to claim that Israel never abided by Oslo anyway.
Erekat said Israel had “relinquished its political and security obligations under the terms of the Oslo Accords.”

Had Israel abided by these agreements, the Palestinian state would have been established in 1999, Erekat said.
And this is precisely why Israel should never enter into agreements with 'drop dead' dates for things that have to be determined by negotiations. By 1999, the parties were to have negotiated a final status arrangement - not the existence of a 'Palestinian state' which is mentioned nowhere in the Oslo accords and was far from a foregone conclusion - but a final status arrangement. The parties did not reach an agreement, and until the 'Palestinians' walked away from the table in 2009, they continued to negotiate, despite the fact that the 'Palestinians' NEVER FULFILLED A SINGLE OBLIGATION THEY UNDERTOOK UNDER THE OSLO ACCORDS! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

By the way, note how the JPost tried to tone down the headline (which I have screen captured for you in case they change it.

Saying that Israel has 'given up' on the accords is a lot different than saying that it never abided by them. The latter is incredible chutzpa coming from an entity that now controls 98% of the Arab population of Judea and Samaria.

What could go wrong?

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

At 9:57 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

The story on the proposed islamic emirates in the UK caught my attention. Many expat British have emigrated to my country (New Zealand )and other countries to escape what they see as the take over of their country by muslims allowed by their government. This really angers me. NZ fought alongside Britain in 2 world wars against foreign powers threatening to invade them. Now the descendants of the citizens of those times are leaving their country because of this immigration problem. Where is their back bone if they really loved their country they would stay to make a difference . ttention. Many expat British have emigrated to my country (New Zealand )and other countries to escape what they see as the take over of their country by muslims allowed by their government. This really angers me. NZ fought alongside Britain in 2 world wars against foreign powers threatening to invade them. Now the descendants of the citizens of those times are leaving their country because of this immigration problem. Where is their back bone if they really loved their country they would stay to make a difference .

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google