Powered by WebAds

Saturday, January 15, 2011

More on Arab and European support for 'Palestinian' terror

In an earlier post, I wrote about the proposed Knesset investigation into the funding of Israel's radical Left, and that much of the funding is coming from Arab countries. Caroline Glick devoted her column this week to the report by Im Tirtzu that precipitated the demand for an investigation. On Saturday night, there was a demonstration against the proposed commission of inquiry in Tel Aviv.
Im Tirtzu's report is titled, "Support by Arab foundations and states for organizations working against the policies of the State of Israel and the IDF." It focuses on two Palestinian organizations headquartered in Ramallah: The Welfare Association, and the NGO Development Center.

The Welfare Association was established in 1983 for the purpose of building a sustainable Palestinian society. It operates in Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem, Gaza, throughout Israel and in Lebanon. It receives money from the EU and the World Bank and separate European governments. It also receives money from Arab governments and Arab governmental funds from Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and OPEC. Of its 2004 budget of nearly $30 million, more than half came from Arab sources.

As the Im Tirtzu report notes, one of those contributors is particularly notable. In 2004, the Welfare Association received $796,606 from the Islamic Development Bank - al Aksa Fund - Saudi Arabia. Im Tirtzu attests that the IDB has continued to fund the Welfare Association since then as well.

According to the IDB's own documents, cited by the Im Tirtzu report, in October 2000 at an Arab League summit in Cairo, Arab leaders decided to establish the IDB's al Aksa Fund and the Al-Quds Intifada Fund "to assert comprehensive Arab support for the Palestinian people in the face of continuous Israeli aggression." Together the two funds received $1 billion to distribute.

According to a report by the American Center for Democracy cited by Im Tirtzu, "In 2001 alone, the IDB transferred $538 million raised publicly by Saudi and Gulf Royal telethons to support the Palestinian intifada and families of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IDB has also channeled UN funds to Hamas, as documented by bank records discovered in the West Bank and Gaza."

In 2001 the Saudi Ain A-Yaqeen newspaper reported that that year the IDB transferred $2,378,072 to the families of Palestinian "martyrs," and prisoners.

Among the many groups it funds, the Welfare Association supports Israeli Arab NGOs. These include Adalah, Balanda, Ahali, Ittijah, Mada al Carmel, and the Galilee Society. The Welfare Association also gives direct support to Israeli Arab municipal governments including Nazareth's municipal government and Kfar Kanna's local council. Its efforts are aimed at breaking the cultural and civic ties between Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews. Among other things, it sponsored a campaign to block Israeli Arabs from volunteering in national service. It also buys properties for Arabs throughout the country.

The Im Tirtzu report shows that in 2006 the Welfare Association was instrumental in forming the NGO Development Center in Ramallah. Five out of 13 members of the NDC's board of directors are also on the Welfare Association's Board of Directors. The Welfare Association also donates money to the NDC.

The NDC acts as yet another clearinghouse for donor money to Palestinian and Israeli NGOs. Aside from the money it receives from the Welfare Association, most of its annual budget of $19 million comes from European governments.

According to the NDC's website, to receive funds from the NDC, groups must agree to "monitor, document, and report on violations by the Israeli military occupation of Palestinian human rights, as well as undertake campaigning and advocacy activities to address these violations and raise awareness about them."

Between July 2008 and December 2009, the NDC allocated $1.89 million to the following Israeli NGOs: B'Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights, the Public Committee Against Torture, Moked: Center for the Defense of the Individual, Bimkom, the Public Committee Against Housing Demolitions, Moussawa, Breaking the Silence, Gisha, Yesh Din, and Workers' Hotline.

The largest beneficiaries were B'Tselem, which was allocated $450,000 and received $405,000 by the end of the reporting period, and Moked which received $500,000.

While it is true that most of NDC's funds are donated by European countries, it is also true that it is a Palestinian organization. And as it funding requirements make clear, in order to receive money from the NDC, groups need to actively participate in political warfare against Israel.

Given Im Tirtzu's limited resources, it is more than likely that its findings are merely the tip of the iceberg. And yet, even with its limited scope, the report makes a convincing case that hostile Arab governments and bodies linked with terror finance are indirectly funding Israeli Arab groups.
Read the whole thing. The one question Glick doesn't really answer is why Benny Begin and Ruby Rivlin are opposed to the commission of inquiry (she also mentions Dan Meridor - who has all but become a Leftist - and Michael Eitan who has also moved somewhat left). Inquiring minds want to know.

Labels: , , ,

3 Comments:

At 12:46 AM, Blogger BH in Iowa said...

The bottom line is it's an investigation. If the leftist groups done nothing wrong they have nothing to worry about. The impression they give is they are terrified of what will be made public.

Heh

 
At 6:50 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Good question. No one is saying Israeli leftists' NGOs don't have the right to freedom of speech and association. But when that is paid for with foreign money, the Israeli public and government officials have a right to know about it and at the very least, they should be required to register as foreign agents.

 
At 9:29 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Two items you missed in your report.

1 In the eyes of the Palestinians, their resistance to Israeli occupation is real and necessary. It does not appear that Israel will give them any form of identity and independence, unless they take it. And who will financially support this? People who believe like them.

2 The beginning of a very slippery slope is the inquisition into dissenters. Witness the fun we had during the McCarthy era. One visible measure of the strength of a society, without resorting to police tactics, is the extent to which unhindered dissent is allowed.

Other than that, interesting perspective.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google