Powered by WebAds

Thursday, June 03, 2010

'Liberal Zionists' must choose a side

Going through some of the links I had opened but not posted over the last few days, I found this from Jonathan Tobin.
But while Israeli spokesmen will be scrambling to tell their side of the story in the coming days, the spotlight on “liberal Zionists” will be crucial in determining not only the way American Jewry responds to the crisis but also the reaction from the Obama administration.

As with the case of Israel’s December 2008 counterattack on terrorist strongholds in Gaza after years of ceaseless missile attacks on its southern towns and villages, today’s naval confrontation offers American Jews a stark choice. They can back Israel or Hamas.

Despite the drumbeat of condemnations against Israel that will be heard in the coming days over this event, the fact is the Gaza flotilla was inspired and supported by Hamas as the presence of several Hamas leaders at its launch in Turkey revealed. The convoy’s supposed goal of bringing succor to starving Palestinians in Gaza is a lie. The Israeli and Egyptian blockade of Hamasistan has not halted the flow of food and medicine to the region. The blockade is aimed at preventing “construction” materials from flowing into Gaza, since Hamas uses these materials to strengthen its military defenses as well as its homegrown arms industry. Talk about aid to suffering Palestinians is nothing but a cover for efforts to aid the Islamists of Hamas, whose ruthless hold on the district was achieved by a bloody coup.

Moreover, the supposedly peaceful intent of the volunteers on the ships is given the lie by an Al-Jazeera news report from the flotilla yesterday that was publicized today by Palestine Media Watch. In the tape, the so-called humanitarians chant Islamist slogans about killing the Jews as they invoke the example of Khaibar, where the Prophet Mohammed’s forces slaughtered the Jews in the year 628. Another participant speaks of their goal being either “martyrdom” or Gaza. It appears that by shooting at Israelis boarding at least one of the ships, some have achieved the former goal. The question of whether Israel’s forces might have been better prepared to subdue them is one for Israelis to consider, but it is not germane to the question of whether the blockade is justified or the contention that those on board the ships were innocent humanitarian victims considering that the Hamas supporters’ goal was to provoke bloodshed no matter what the Israelis did.

The question now is whether self-proclaimed liberal Zionists — to use the phrase made popular by the controversy over Peter Beinart’s Israel-bashing essay in the New York Review of Books — such as J Street will use this incident to bolster their campaign for American Jews to distance themselves from Israel. In December 2008, J Street stood virtually alone as it condemned Israel’s counterattack on Gaza, exposing its extremist nature. President Obama has belatedly realized that this left-wing lobby is not representative of American Jewry, as his May “charm offensive” toward Jews, which sought to back away from a policy of confrontation with Israel, revealed. But with J Street renewing its call for an end to the blockade of Hamas in a statement that echoes the rhetoric of anti-Zionist groups about Gaza and for America to force Israel into more concessions to Hamas, American Jews, especially those who consider themselves liberals, must decide whether they stand with a group that essentially backs the short-term goals of Hamas and its supporters or an Israeli government that was elected by its people. At a time when Israel needs American support as much as it ever did, liberals must understand that the administration will be looking to them to see whether they can abandon Israel with impunity.
Here's betting that an awful lot of 'liberal Zionists' will back Hamas. Here in Israel, on the other hand, there seems to be support for what happened on Monday at levels not seen since Operation Cast Lead. That split is coming.

4 Comments:

At 12:56 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Carl - it already has. Even on the anti-Zionist "Mondoweiss" website, they discussed an Arutz Sheva poll that showed 67% of Israelis said "don't tangle with us," 27% said it was the right thing to do and only 6% said Israel should apologize for what happened or mend fences. That means 94% of Israelis backed Monday's IDF operation. Pretty amazing when you consider 1 in 5 Israelis are Arab. I don't think the Arutz Sheva poll reflects just the views of National Religious Zionists - I think it really does reflect the national mood. And its not hard to guess the liberal Zionists are among the 6% who think Israel hasn't kvetched to the world enough.

Heh

 
At 7:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Help make it go viral:

Latma music video: "We Con the World"

 
At 12:14 PM, Blogger Juniper in the Desert said...

Liberal "zionists"? Isn't that an oxymoron?

If they are anti-Israel throw them out and send them to be dhimmis in Gaza, where they will have to become muslims to survive. Because that is what they want if they don't support Israel!

They can't have it both ways!

 
At 1:59 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

"What will induce the Jews to found a state and to settle in it?

We can trust the anti-Semites to see to that." Theodor Herzl

Either a Jew is a Zionist or he should leave Israel.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google