Powered by WebAds

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Durban II: Obama and (Susan) Rice have no place to hide

On Monday April 20, the 120th birthday of Adolph Hitler YMS"H (may his name be obliterated), a conference on 'racism' will open in Geneva, Switzerland under the tutelage of Iran, Libya and Cuba. The conference, known as Durban II, has effectively cut off all debate of its 'final document.' The good news is that the Obama administration has now run out of excuses for attending the conference. The bad news is that they may attend anyway.

A version of this article, which I received by email, is supposed to be in Thursday's New York Daily News. As of this writing, approximately 4:30 am Eastern time (11:30 am in Israel), it has not yet appeared. Therefore, I am going to post the full article I received by email, and I will add a link later if there is one. (UPDATE 7:04 PM - The Daily News version is here).
Durban II Alert

The Durban II Snow Job: One giant leap backwards for humankind

A version of this article appears in The New York Daily News, Thursday, April 16, 2009.

The UN’s idea of an anti-racism conference entered the final stretch today with the planning committee deciding Iran ought to preside as a Vice-Chair, Libya will serve as the Chair of the “Main Committee” running the conference and Cuba will be the Rapporteur. All three human rights paragons will assume their new duties on the first day of “Durban II” set for Monday, April 20th.

Although the flowers are blooming by Lake Geneva, these Durban II preparations are best described as a massive snow job. The UN had set aside three days this week to hammer out a final document to be adopted formally at the conference itself. But Libyan Chair Najat Al-Hajjaji adjourned the meeting half an hour after it began – despite the fact that half of the 142-paragraph draft manifesto has not yet been agreed.

Al-Hajjaji is serving as the front for the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) . Her not-so-hidden agenda is shared by the Secretary-General of Durban II, UN High Commissioner Navi Pillay. For Pillay, a native of Durban, South Africa, the Durban Declaration’s stature is of biblical proportion. Sitting at the podium side-by-side, Al-Hajjaji and Pillay’s strategy became painfully obvious to the hundreds of assembled diplomats and NGO representatives who thought they had came to talk about combating racism.

Their maneuver had two main elements. First, run out the clock. By adjourning rapidly, and probably for most of the next two days, the conference will be bound to start on Monday with the European Union at the table and the threat of a democratic pull-out gone. All UN diplomats are well aware of the fact that the EU will agree to just about anything when faced with the spectacle of a “failed” UN conference. EU members don’t have the numbers to prevail at the UN if a vote is called and therefore feign consensus instead of appearing to be “losers” to the folks back home. They are also fond of the UN as a means to outweigh the United States 27-1. And EU states wilt at the prospect of being labeled former colonial racists (by racists from the developing world.)

The second Al-Hajjaji-Pillay/OIC-UN move is to keep all disagreements behind closed doors as long as possible. This way, the damage done to combating racism in the backroom negotiations will be in the form of indecipherable ambiguous UN-eze by the time it is a done deal.

When Al-Hajjaji clocked out 30 minutes after showing up for work, she asked delegates to pick up a new draft of the “Durban II Outcome Document” on their way out the door. Little wonder she wanted no opportunity for public discussion. Here is what can be found in the latest draft of the UN’s new “anti-racism” bible:

* Condemnation of “foreign occupation” – aka Israel-bashing. Foreign occupation is said to be “closely associated with racism, racial discrimination…and contribute to the persistence of racist attitudes and practices…” In other words, labeling the Jewish nation as the world’s racist state is back.
* "Defamation of religions" returns under a new guise. The document professes “deep concern” about “the negative stereotyping of religions.”
* More of the Islamic assault on free speech. The draft “reaffirms that all dissemination of ideas based on…incitement to racial discrimination…shall be declared offences punishable by law…”
* More Iranian-driven references to “cultural diversity” – the diplomatic cover for the murder of homosexuals, judicially-sanctioned amputation of hands and feet, and the stoning of woman for alleged adultery.
* Renewed emphasis on the “transatlantic slave trade” and total rejection of a proposed mention of the trans-Saharan slave trade perpetrated by Arabs and other Africans.
* Additional emphasis on the adoption of “complementary standards” on racism and xenophobia – an Islamic idea designed to subvert the universal principles in existing treaties.

And lest anyone be under the impression that Durban II will go away come April 25th, the draft demands that the Durban Declaration be implemented or “mainstreamed” “in the whole UN system” forevermore.

Silencing public commentary on the abomination was not the only thing the OIC-UN nexus accomplished in the space of thirty minutes. Also quickly gaveled without comment was approval of 81 NGOs to participate in Durban II. Included among these illustrious “human rights” partners:

* The Independent Jewish Voices – a network composed largely of anti-Zionists preoccupied with driving a wedge between Jews and Israel.
* The Palestine Return Center which objects to the creation of a Jewish state with the tale of “ethnic cleansing of Palestine that began more than sixty years ago”.
* The Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation, headed by the son of Muammar al-Gaddafi. This fellow still insists that the Libyans convicted of the bombing of PanAm flight 103 were innocent.

The Obama administration has delayed a decision whether to come or go to this fiasco UNTIL the final hour. The opening sentence of this new draft still “reaffirms” the 2001 Durban Declaration which the US rejected the first time around for its overt discrimination and demonization of Israel. The administration has said it wouldn’t go to Durban II if this Declaration was “reaffirmed in toto.” Combined with the new allegations of racism against Israel, the President and UN Ambassador Rice have nowhere left to hide.

Other countries that might stay out, together with Canada and Israel, include Australia, Italy and the Netherlands. Australia has had a wet-finger in the wind for months. Italy is not participating at the moment and doesn’t have any reason to go back with this latest travesty. And Dutch efforts to improve the outcome document have been treated with disdain. Still the Germans and French are pressing hard for a show of EU solidarity – the merits of Durban II and all those faux-“red-lines” they once espoused be damned.

On Monday, April 20th, the anniversary of Hitler’s birth, an Iranian will be elected as a Vice-chair of a global “anti-racism” conference. In the afternoon of opening day, a genocidal Holocaust denier – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – will address a UN conference “against” racism. The European Union will sit and listen to an antisemite give a lecture about combating intolerance. And in the end most UN states will adopt a document incompatible with the UN’s foundational principle of the equality of all men and women and nations large and small.

A good day for UN-based antisemites. A bad day for those who care about human rights.
It's time for Obama to find the courage to say no. He can't vote 'present' on this one.


At 12:48 PM, Blogger Matt said...

A conference on racism being presided over by Iran, Cuba, and Liby.

Thats the problem with the UN. It is an institution which grants equal legitimacy to all the goverments of the world. A rediculous idea.

Set asided the fact that Durban II is designed as a platform to bash Israel, one of America strongest and most loyal allies. Why would Obama want to be involved in any conference with the likes of this bunch?

At 1:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The start of the solution has long been for Israel to up and leave the UN.

At 8:58 PM, Blogger Bill said...

Small bit of good news- the Germans have now said they're not going.

At 6:04 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Adolf Hitler would have loved those proceedings. How appropriate it should open on his birthday as a week long hate the Jews rally. With those three staunch champions (Libya, Iran And Cuba)of human rights running the show, its a good bet we will never hear anything about the true state of human rights in the world. What would be truly shameful is the US government extending legitimacy to that Orwellian exercise in moral depravity and intellectual imbecility. President Obama and his UN Ambassador have no place to hide anymore. This is one of those situations in life where a nation can't just vote "present."


Post a Comment

<< Home