Ezra Levant debunks the 'Trump as anti-Semite' meme.
Let's go to the videotape (Hat Tip: Zvi S).
I won't go to the halachic (Jewish law) implications of Trump's kids all marrying or dating Jews, but the point that Trump doesn't hate Jews seems well-taken.
Levin's description of Obama trying to 'protect the Muslim faith' strikes the perfect balance between (largely unsubstantiated) claims that Obama is actually a Muslim and Obama's claim that he's a Christian. This is really spot-on.
The event gathered nearly four million people,
but seeing in it a mobilization against terrorism, jihad and
anti-Semitism would be a mistake. Leaders of "anti-Zionist" left-wing
organizations that support Hamas were present. Ministers of states financing jihadist terrorism, and even genocide, were also there.
The Ambassador of Saudi Arabia attended, shortly after his nation had just finished flogging Raif Badawi,
a young Saudi blogger accused of "insulting Islam," with the first
fifty lashes of his sentence of 1000 lashes plus 10 years in prison, for
practicing the most gentle free speech. Badawi is now being flayed
alive -- "very severely," the lashing order said. He has 950 lashes to
go.
Turkey, which hosts part of the leadership of the genocidal Hamas organization, was there. Turkey has also jailed more journalists than any other country, including Iran and China.
Mahmoud Abbas, the president of a Palestinian unity government, which includes Hamas and directly supports jihadist terrorism as well as genocide, was at the forefront -- smiling. Binyamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, was initially not invited. He came anyhow.
French officials let him know that he was not welcome and not to speak.
He spoke anyhow. As a sign of disapproval, French officials left the
Grand Synagogue of Paris during the ceremony for the dead Jews, before
Netanyahu's speech.
The President of the populist National Front, Marine Le Pen, was also not included. She is silent. She is sure a coming explosion will happen, and that she will receive more votes.
The slogans in the demonstration spoke of "free speech" and the need
to "live together." Signs saying "I am Charlie" were everywhere. Signs
saying "I am a Jew" ["Je suis Juif"] were rare.
No signs or
slogans mentioned jihad or the need to combat jihad or terrorism: the
watchword was that these subjects should be shunned. No signs or slogan
mentioned anti-Semitism or the real cause of jihadist attacks:
caricatures of Mohammed, considered by Koranic law to be blasphemous.
Those subjects had to be abandoned.
Few French Muslims came -- the tiniest drop in a huge ocean -- and
the television cameras immediately homed in on them. They were
interviewed and stated their only concern: "Avoid stigmatization of the Muslim community!"
Prime Minister Manuel Valls had told journalists he was "afraid" for
Muslims. Two days later -- and only two days later -- on January 13, he said
that "France is at war against terrorism, jihadism and radical Islam."
He added immediately that one of his priorities was to fight mercilessly
against "Islamophobia."
This reminds me of George Bush in the aftermath of 9/11 saying that 'you're either with the terrorists or against them,' while insisting that Islam is a 'religion of peace.' It muddles (and muddies) reality. For those of you who don't get it yet, here's a dose of reality.
Anyone who watches television and sees what is happening in many
Muslim countries has to be doubting that Islam is peaceful. Most Muslim
"experts" invited to speak are familiar with Islam, familiar with the
internet and familiar with what is going on in many Muslim countries --
but they lie. Almost all of them are militants, imams, Muslim scholars.
Most of them are members of Islamic organizations. Many belong to the
French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the French have just
obligingly given them a platform.
The idea that Muslims have to be integrated was discussed many times
-- in vain. The absence of integration has worsened decade after decade.
"Experts" invited to speak about integration were forcefully lying too.
Those who knew the truth and could tell it were kept away.
More than 750 no-go zones exist in the country, all under the sway of gang leaders and radical imams.
More than 60% percent of inmates in French prisons are Muslim.
And future Amedy Coulibalys, Cherif Kouachis, Mohamed Merahs and Mehdi
Nemmouches are radicalized every year before going off to train for
jihad in Syria or Yemen.
Terrorism experts say
that dozens of jihadists are preparing attacks in France alone, and
that more deadly attacks will take place. They stress that many
terrorist sleeper cells exist in the country. France is a country where
gun ownership by ordinary citizens is forbidden. So most people are
powerless against aggressors, as tens of thousands of guns are hidden in
basements.
But to the New York Times, the fact that 60% of the prison population is Muslim has nothing to do with Muslims or Islam. They're blaming France.
The
profiles of the three attackers — Amedy Coulibaly and the brothers
Chérif and Saïd Kouachi — are an indictment of the decades-long failure
of France to address long-festering alienation and exclusion among too
many Muslim immigrants and their French-born children. Unemployment is
as high as 40 percent among youths
in France’s disadvantaged neighborhoods. All three attackers grew up in
poverty. Chérif Kouachi and Mr. Coulibaly spent time in prison. All
ultimately found deadly purpose in Islamist terrorism.
Prison
was the crucible of their radicalization. There are five million to six
million Muslims in France, less than 10 percent of the total
population, but 60 percent of France’s prison inmates are of “Muslim
culture or religion,” according to a report presented to France’s
National Assembly. It was in prison that Mr. Kouachi and Mr. Coulibaly
met the Qaeda recruiter Djamel Beghal. To stem recruiting by Islamist
extremists in prisons, the government of President François Hollande has
announced it will seek to isolate identified Islamist proselytizers
from other prisoners.
There
is also the problem of France’s secularism. A ban on head scarves in
public schools and on full-face veils feels to many Muslims like an
unfair constraint on their religious freedom. Some also find it hard to
accept that blasphemy is not a crime in France, and that Charlie Hebdo
and other publications have a right to satirize religious leaders. Some
students in French schools with large immigrant and Muslim populations
refused to participate
in the national minute of silence following the Charlie Hebdo attack
because they objected to what they had heard about the magazine’s
depictions of the Prophet Muhammad.
The New York Times objects to blasphemy? That's a good laugh. Too bad they don't object to it when the targets are Jews or Christians - only when they're Muslims.
And if it were only France that had this problem, there might be an argument here. But in country after country across Europe and elsewhere, Muslims have specifically made the effort not to integrate into wider society. They're certainly within their rights to do that. But they then cannot be heard to complain (or to have others complain on their behalf) that they're not being integrated. Because the same thing that is going on in France is going on in England, Belgium, Germany and several other countries.
In the meantime, most French citizens disagree with the high and might New York Times:
French Jews could see on January 11 that Prime Minister Netanyahu was
not welcome, while Abbas and other supporters of jihad were celebrated.
They see how speaking ill of Israel blows through the mainstream media
and feeds increasing Jew-hate. They see the French parliament vote for
the creation of an admittedly genocidal "Palestinian State."
They see that they are unarmed and that the soldiers in the streets
will not be there forever. They see that jihadists are preparing more
attacks. They see no-go zones grow increasingly turbulent. They see what
is happening in prisons. They see that the French justice system gives
short terms to jihadists and releases them quickly. They see that the
government cannot stop mass riots and has no way to prevent more
attacks. They see that if just Jews had been targeted in recent attacks,
no protests would have taken place. Each year they see more Jews leave the country. Seven thousand left for Israel in 2014, and the Jewish Agency for Israel expects 15,000 this year.
The Muslim population is largely silent, except in the heavily-Muslim
suburbs, where those who support Coulibaly and the Kouachi brothers can
speak without risking arrest. Those who speak officially in the name of
the French Muslim community explain that Islam is not the threat, that the real culprits are those who "insult Islam," and that "the main victims" are Muslims.
The rest of the French population is not convinced. Several polls show that more that 70% of the French think Islam is incompatible with democracy and Western civilization; those polls predate the recent attacks.
The only thing everyone agrees on is that this month's terror attacks in France are only the start, and much bigger explosions are coming.
NY Times wants to hear about minority experiences in Europe... but only if they're Muslims
If you're a minority in Europe, the New York Times is interested in hearing about your experiences this month. But only if you're a Muslim.
In the aftermath of the Paris attacks last week, the New York Times
is understandably interested in hearing about the experiences of
minorities in Europe these days. That is commendable. It’s just the kind
of journalism that sheds light on everyday life of people facing
adversity the world over. It’s important and informative and insightful,
and we applaud it, and look forward to reading it.
Scratch that. Actually, the Times is obsessively interested in the experiences of only one minority group in Europe: Muslims.
To that end, the paper has issued a call to its Muslim readers abroad to share their experiences.
“The deadly attacks in Paris on Charlie Hebdo, a satirical French newspaper that lampooned Islam, and a kosher grocery store
heightened tensions in Europe, where the increasing radicalization of
young Muslims appears to coincide with a growing anti-Islamic
sentiment.”
It’s hard to understand the paper’s continuing obsession, in their surveys and on their editorial page,
with the mortal threat of “Islamophobia”—a dubious term that lumps
together actual crimes with thought-crimes, like reprinting the cover of
Charlie Hebdo—when the people being harassed, beaten, and murdered in
Europe these days are Jews. This is especially true when the people
doing the harassing, beating and killing are Islamists.
The Times changed its headline during the day on Thursday. But the bottom line is that they're really only interested in hearing from Muslims. And the stupid Jews keep reading that rag and trusting it as a news source.
After Wednesday night's terror attack in which Yehuda Glick, an advocate of Jewish prayer rights on the Temple Mount, was shot and seriously wounded, the Israel Police announced on Thursday that no one would be allowed on the Temple Mount.
An Israeli truck driver decided on Sunday that enough is enough.
But on Sunday, Kerem Shalom resident and married dad, Daniel Meteri, 27, snapped.
He’d had enough of the hundreds of rockets in the sixth day of
Operation Protective Edge, and the thousands before then, and for three
hours refused to move his vehicle parked across the two-lane road
leading to the crossing point, at the southern end of the Strip.
His wildcat strike halted a several-kilometer-long line of trucks carrying goods to the Palestinians.
“I have no problem with them receiving humanitarian aid,” he told
Israel’s Channel 2 News.
“Gas, fuel, medical supplies - no problem,” he
said. “But cola and all these other luxuries? They fire at us and we’re
giving them goods so they can keep firing?” he asked aloud.
“Why are we supplying them concrete – so they can build another
tunnel under the kibbutz?” he asked, and claimed that the drivers
waiting to deliver their loads support his stance.
“The drivers who were delayed because of me support my position,” he said, adding that some of them are area residents.
“There were even drivers from (the Bedouin Negev city of ) Rahat who
agreed with me, saying that they, too, were under fire,” he said,
emphasizing that “this isn’t a matter of Arabs against Jews – we’re all
against Hamas.”
I'm so glad to hear that there are still some smart Jews in this country.
Six suspects were in custody Sunday night on suspicion of being involved in the murder of Mohammed Abu Khder. The six were arrested earlier Sunday.
According to Channel Ten news, police were granted a request Sunday afternoon to extend the remand of five of the six for
eight days. The sixth one will remain in custody for five days. Earlier
reports said that three of the six had been released. Reports also said
that the six are mostly members of an extended family, and live in
Jerusalem, Beit Shemesh, and the town of Adam in the Binyamin region.
Police sources have also said that the six “connected themselves” to the incident. Channel Two said that one of the six confessed to the crime and implicated the others.
Honenu has agreed to represent them. Honenu usually represents persons involved in pro-'settler' activity. I hope this doesn't mean that there are 'settlers' involved in this (although Adam is located in Samaria just north of Jerusalem).
I am shocked that a Jew may have done something like this. That's not how we behave.
An investigative report in Makor Rishon cites La Stampa Vatican Insider
journalist Andrea Tornielli as saying that the deal has been nearly
completed, and that Deputy Foreign Minister Ze'ev Elkin is in charge of
the negotiations with the Vatican, but Israel denies any such deal.
The agreement allegedly contains two elements. The first is Israel's
forgoing the levying of property tax and other taxes for all “churches,
holy sites, prayer houses and cemeteries.” The second is the transfer of
the “Last Supper room” on the floor above David's tomb to the
Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land (Custodia Terræ Sanctæ).
Rabbi Yaakov Sevilia, an activist for King David's Tomb, told Arutz Sheva
Sunday that there is also a deal between Christians and Muslims,
according to which the Muslims will retain control over the Temple Mount
whereas Mount Zion will become Christian property. He cited journalist Gulio Meotti, who contributes regularly to Arutz Sheva, as the source for this knowledge.
Rabbi Sevilia emphasized that the tomb is, without a doubt, the
burial place of King David, and mentioned a recent book – “The Secret of
David's Tomb” – as containing proof of this claim.
"The Christians believe that the Tomb of David is indeed located
here, but they do everything possible to confuse us, the Jewish people,
so that we lose our connection to this place,” he accused. He added that
while there has been a Jewish awakening with regard to the site, the
Christian presence at the tomb is still much greater than the Jewish
presence, with about 200 tour buses bringing Christians to the site
daily.
There have been reports in the past about a deal to transfer the second floor of the Tomb to the Vatican. Tornielli says
that this is the core issue in talks between the Vatican and Israel.
Rabbi Sevilia claims that the Last Supper Room is just a toehold that
the Vatican intends to expand in the future, in a ploy to take over the
entire Tomb site.
Two points. First, I'd like to know what Israel is getting in this 'deal.' If anyone can find anything, please let me know because I don't see it.
Second, not that I'm advocating turning the site over to the Christians (the very fact that thousands of Jewish prayers have been said there makes the location holy to Jews), but the question of whether the tomb is actually located on Mount Zion is not quite as settled as Rabbi Sevilia is making it out to be. Last Succot, we did a tour of the City of David, in which we were shown a site (admittedly without a tombstone) which could potentially have been King David's burial place. And the location fit more closely with the scriptures (although I honestly do not remember how or why).
How many Muslims have won Nobel prizes? There are 117 times as many Muslims as Jews and the Jews have won 184 Nobel prizes. How many have the Muslims won? You'll find the answer to that and many other questions when you go to the videotape.
Let's go to the videotape (Hat Tip: Leah P).
)
In case you're wondering, the speaker is Brother Rashid, a Moroccan-Christian preacher.
B'nai Brith Canada has learned from Canadian Jewish tourists aboard a Norwegian Jade cruise ship that Israeli tourists have been denied the right to disembark when the ship dropped anchor at the Port of Tunis, Tunisia. As passengers began preparations to visit the country, Israelis on board were quietly told that they were not welcomed by the Tunisian Government and would have to remain onboard.
According to some Jewish passengers no prior notice was issued, either in writing or by public announcement. The cruise line also failed to advise passengers in advance that Israeli tourists would be confined to the ship when arriving at the Tunisian port. Other Jews aboard were unaware that their coreligionists were being detained and were outraged when news of the incident spread.
According to B'nai Brith Canada's CEO, Frank Dimant, "The cruise line has a responsibility to it's passengers to advise them of this discriminatory policy in advance. Better still the cruise line should avoid ports that have such policies. "
Aren't you glad that there was an Arab spring so that all the Muslim countries get self-determination?
David Ben Gurion puts John Foster Dulles in his place
Received by email:
In 1954, when Ben Gurion was Prime Minister, he traveled to the USA to
meet with President Eisenhower to request his assistance and support in
the early and difficult days of the State of Israel.
John Foster Dulles, who was the then secretary of state, confronted Ben Gurion and challenged him as follows:
"Tell
me, Mr. Prime Minister - who do you and your state represent? Does it
represent the Jews of Poland, perhaps Yemen, Romania,Morocco, Iraq,
Russia or perhaps Brazil? After 2000 years of exile can you honestly
speak about a single nation, a single culture? Can you speak about a
single heritage or perhaps a single Jewish tradition?"
Ben Gurion answered him as follows:
"Look, Mr. Secretary of State - approximately 300 years ago the
Mayflower set sail from England and on it were the first settlers who
settled in what would become the largest demo-cratic superpower known as
the United States of America. Now, do me a favor - go out into the
streets and find 10 American children and ask them the following:
What was the name of the Captain of the Mayflower?
How long did the voyage take?
What did the people who were on the ship eat?
What were the conditions of sailing during the voyage?
I'm sure you would agree with me that there is a good chance that you won't get a good answer to these questions.
Now in contrast - not 300 but more than 3000 years ago, the Jews left the land of Egypt.
I
would kindly request from you Mr. Secretary that on one of your trips
around the world, try and meet 10 Jewish children in different
countries. And ask them:
'What was the name of the leader who took the Jews out of Egypt?'
'How long did it take them before they got to the land of Israel?
'What did they eat during the period when they were wandering in the desert?'
'And what happened to the sea when they encountered it?'
'Once you get the answers to these questions, please carefully reconsider the question that you have just asked me!"
Heh.
UPDATE MONDAY 7:49 PM
For those wondering about the authenticity of this story, the Ben Gurion quote is apparently accurate, the connection to Dulles is not.
The bill would seek to ban public employees from wearing
large Christian crosses or religious headwear such as that worn by
Sikhs, Muslims and Jews while at work.
Richard Marceau, a former politician who now advises the
Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, wrote a column for Huffington Post
criticizing the proposal.
“How could one believe that a kippah-wearing Jewish librarian is… trying to impose his religion on society?” Marceau wrote.
The details of the proposed law were leaked to Journal de
Montrèal last week, but the Parti Quebecois, which heads the provincial
government, has refused to confirm them or answer questions related to
the issue.
My grandmother a"h (peace be upon her) was in Israel in 1980 while I was studying in yeshiva. In the post-Camp David euphoria, she suggested that we visit Egypt together during my Pesach vacation. And so, we did. We flew Tel Aviv to Cairo on El Al, spent three days staying in the Sheharezade Hotel along the banks of the Nile (right near the 6th of October bridge you've all seen in the news and probably not far from Tahrir Square), spent a day in Cairo, flew to Luxor one day to see the tombs of the kings (50 degrees Celsius in March - my grandmother dehydrated in the heat), and then were taken by a driver to Alexandria on the third day. Everywhere we went (and we had private tour guides for the entire trip), my grandmother begged them to take us to a synagogue. So we saw the outside of Cairo's main synagogue and the outside of the Rambam (Maimonides) synagogue, and we drove past a Jewish square in Alexandria. The only Jew we met was the caretaker at the Maimonides synagogue.
I mention all this because I was surprised to discover that there are still 14 Jews - all women - left who live in Cairo. Not surprisingly, they are all happier to have the army in charge than the Muslim Brotherhood.
Haroun, the president of the Egyptian Jewish community, doesn’t enjoy
hearing anti-Semitic slurs on the street. She gets nervous when she
hears Egyptians are burning the churches of Coptic Christians, a much
larger religious minority than the country’s tiny Jewish community.
She
assumes that most of her compatriots have forgotten there are any Jews
left in Egypt.
But when protesters filled Cairo’s Tahrir Square at
the end of June calling on President Mohamed Morsi to step down, she
was right there with them.
“The amount of people in Tahrir was
breathtaking,” Haroun told JTA. “The unity between people was
breathtaking. Some of the people recognized me because I was on TV. They
were shaking my hand and telling me, ‘God bless you. You are a real
Egyptian.’ ”
Haroun, 61, is the youngest of the 14 women who make
up Cairo’s dwindling Jewish community. Most are now in their 80s, living
off charity and rental income from properties the community has owned
for generations.
But though small in number, Haroun says the
community is proud of its country and, like many Egyptians, supportive
of the army’s campaign to quell Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood.
...
Jews have lived in Egypt for millennia. Around the time of Israel’s
founding in 1948, the community was estimated to number 75,000, but in
the decades that followed the vast majority fled.
Those that
remain are happy to call Egypt home, Haroun says. Although she has
relatives in several European countries, she vows to “never, never,
never” leave.
“I’m very proud to be here,” she said. “I want to do
whatever I can to help. We are a strong people. I am very happy now
that people [are] in the street. Instead of talking about football, they
are talking politics. There is more awareness about the importance of
our country.”
On Tuesday, CNN reported that the White House was
withholding some military aid to Egypt in protest of the military’s
violent crackdown on Morsi supporters. But for Haroun, the army’s
assertion of control is a welcome development she sees as “fighting
terrorism.”
Haroun says the Jewish community thus far has not
experienced any anti-Semitism as a result of the fighting — probably,
she says, because it’s so small.
Under Morsi’s rule, however, it was a different story.
Europe continues to delude itself that Hezbullah is not a terror organization, or alternatively that it has a 'political branch' that is not a terror organization. Europe will not ban Hezbullah, partly because they fear it, partly because they don't recognize the full extent of its threat and that it cannot be bought off in the long run, and partly because Hezbullah 'only targets Jews' anyway.
But Europe's appeasement of Hezbullah comes with an ever increasing price. JPost reports that shortly after the Burgas terror attack last summer, an Iranian woman traveling on a Canadian passport was caught surveilling the Chabad Center in Sofia.
An Iranian-sponsored female agent in her 50s, holding a Canadian
passport, traveled from Istanbul to Sofia several weeks after the bombing of the Israeli tour bus
in the Black Sea resort town of Burgas in July 2012. She was arrested
on her first day in Sofia after the Bulgarian police, on high alert,
noticed she was monitoring the Chabad center.
Her mission was to
survey the Chabad center – which houses a synagogue – and not the main
Sofia Sephardi synagogue, as first reported.
The Canadian may be a dual Iranian-Canadian citizen.
...
Dr. Matthew Levitt, director of the Stein Program on Counterterrorism
and Intelligence at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and a
leading authority on Hezbollah’s global terror operations, told the
Post that, “It would not surprise [us] if Iran or Hezbollah were found
to be behind this plot [against the Chabad center] last year. Recall
that five years earlier Western intelligence indicated that ‘Hezbollah
chiefs and Iranian intelligence officials had put Bulgaria on a list of
nations propitious for developing plots against Western targets.’ “Their
first attempt at killing Israeli tourists failed when a suspicious
package was noticed on a bus carrying Israeli tourists from Turkey to
Bulgaria in January 2012. Six months later Hezbollah operatives struck
again, this time with devastating success in Burgas.”
The latest
disclosure about Iran’s alleged monitoring of the Chabad center may add
new weight to the EU talks about banning Hezbollah, Iran’s chief proxy
in Europe.
Dr. Wahied Wahdat-Hagh, an expert on Iranian terrorism
in Europe and senior fellow with the Brussels-based European Foundation
for Democracy, told the Post on Saturday, “Europe needs to wake up and
learn from Hezbollah’s terrorism.” He said the group uses Iranian
“know-how and money” to launch its terror attacks.
Islamic terror organizations have a special place in their hearts for Jews in general, and for religious Jews and especially for Chabad in particular. People who are visibly Jewish seem to disturb them more than others. And the world doesn't care.
Argentina's President rips local Jewish community leaders
Two weeks ago, I reported that Israel had expressed shock at an agreement reached between Iran and Argentina to form a 'truth commission' to investigate Iran's and Hezbullah's roles in the 1994 truck bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. Three days later, Argentinian foreign minister Hector Timmerman summoned and dressed down Israeli ambassador Dorit Shavit, claiming that the entire affair was none of Israel's business.
According to Foreign Ministry sources who saw Shavit's account of
the meeting, Timerman was "upset and really angry" that Israel had
demanded explanations of the Argentine ambassador. He apparently
launched into a long monologue in which he assailed Israel for
intervening in Argentina's internal affairs and even charged that such
behavior encourages anti-Semitism. Shavit was barely able to utter a
word in response, as he cut her off repeatedly, according to sources.
"Israel has no right to demand explanations; we're a sovereign
state," Timerman reportedly told her. "Israel doesn't speak in the name
of the Jewish people and doesn't represent it. Jews who wanted or want
to live in Israel moved there, and they are its citizens; those who live
in Argentina are Argentine citizens. The attack was against Argentina,
and Israel's desire to be involved in the issue only gives ammunition to
anti-Semites who accuse Jews of dual loyalty."
Summoning the Argentine ambassador and then leaking the fact to
the media was unacceptable behavior, he apparently continued.
"Argentina doesn't summon the Israeli ambassador for explanations. If we
wanted to, we could summon you here twice a month to demand
explanations about a military operation in Gaza or construction in the
settlements. But we don't do that, because we don't want to intervene in
your sovereign decisions."
Shavit responded angrily, according to sources. "As the Jewish
state, Israel views itself as responsible to some degree for the welfare
of [all] Jews and tracks anti-Semitism worldwide," she reportedly told
Timerman. "Therefore, it helped Jews leave the Soviet Union, brought
Jews from Ethiopia and, at times, also helped Jews in Argentina. You
surely know what I'm talking about," she apparently added, referring to
Timerman's own family history.
In the 1980s, Timerman's father, himself a Jew, was arrested by
the right-wing military junta then running the country because he was a
journalist who supported the left. He was held in prison in solitary
confinement, but was finally released due to the intervention of the
Israeli ambassador to Argentina and his staff - some of whom are today
senior Foreign Ministry officials. They reached a secret deal with the
junta under which Timerman's father would be allowed to leave the
country. He moved to Israel for a few years, but returned to Argentina
once the junta fell.
Shavit reportedly stressed that Israel wasn't trying to
intervene in Argentina's decisions, but it did want explanations, due to
the similarity between the AMIA bombing and an attack on the Israeli
embassy in Buenos Aires two years earlier. The Argentine police and
security agencies believe that Iran and Hezbollah were behind both
bombings. Nevertheless, Timerman decided to play dumb, according to
sources.
"I don't know if there's any connection between the two
attacks," he apparently said. "If Israel has any such information, I ask
that you give it to us as a soon as possible."
On Sunday, Isi Leibler wrote about the AMIA bombing in the Jerusalem Post, accusing the Argentinian government of collaborating with the murderers of their own citizens.
THAT THE Argentinian leaders could collaborate
with such a cynical whitewashing of the murder of their own citizens and create
a “truth commission” with a wretched, despotic, Holocaust denying regime should
lead to the condemnation of the Argentinian government by the civilized world.
It should be viewed as even worse than the Venezuela of Hugo Chavez, known to be
one of Argentina’s principal allies and funders.
Underlying this move are
the economic problems Argentina is facing in relation to its debts to the World
Bank and other global institutions. As far back as March 2011, there were media
reports alleging that Argentinian Foreign Minister Hector Timmerman had offered
to freeze the AMIA inquiry in return for an upgrade in economic relations with Iran. It was also alleged that Timmerman had proposed that Syrian President
Bashar Assad could act as an intermediary to facilitate such a deal. A
purportedly leaked cable from Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Salehi was quoted
stating, “Argentina is no longer interested in solving those two attacks, but in
exchange prefers improving its economic relations with Iran.”
The current
Argentinian Jewish communal leaders are a far cry from their courageous
predecessors who led the community until the 1980s. Yet, despite being
intimidated by Timmerman, they still conveyed muted distress concerning their
government’s shameful whitewash of the Iranians responsible for the cold-blooded
murder of their kinsmen.
Leibler notes Hector Timmerman's cynical and gratuitous role in this affair:
However, a few years later in 1983 [Hector Timmerman's father Jacobo] published a second book
brutally attacking Israel’s policies in relation to the Lebanon war and accusing
prime minister Menachem Begin of destroying the moral integrity of the Jewish
people and transforming Israelis into “efficient criminals.” He compared Israel
to the fascist government of Argentina which had incarcerated and tortured him
and called for a tribunal of Diaspora Jews to pass moral judgment on Israel’s
leaders and the IDF. Shortly after publishing his tirade, he left Israel and
died in Buenos Aires in 1999.
His hatred and lack of appreciation to
Israel for saving his life was bequeathed to his son, Hector. Prior to becoming
foreign minister, Hector’s Jewish background is alleged to have been a major
factor contributing to his appointment as Argentina’s consul-general in New
York, where he developed relations with influential members of the Jewish
community.
As foreign minister, Timmerman presents himself as a devoted
supporter of human rights. Yet he played a central role on behalf of the
Argentinian regime in sanitizing the Iranian murderer of his own people.
Orchestrating such a pact with one of the world’s worst abusers of human rights
makes a mockery of his moral pretensions.
He also clearly relishes
attacking Israel, seemingly oblivious to the fact that the Jewish state was
responsible for saving his father’s life. Only last month, he compared the UK’s
control of the Falkland Islands, which Argentina claims, to Israel’s “colonial”
control of the West Bank.
But Leibler may have gotten one thing wrong: At least one of Argentina's Jewish leaders is more courageous than Leibler gave him credit for being. And as a result, on Saturday, Argentina's President, Cristina Kirchner, lashed out against that leader.
Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de
Kirchner publicly attacked the head of Buenos Aires' Jewish community,
hinting he was in contact with a "foreign espionage agency that knows of
a new terror attack planned against Argentina."
Guillermo Borger, president of the AMIA
Buenos Aires Jewish center, said the Argentina-Iran agreement to set up a
committee to investigate the 1994 bombing of the center "will allow a
third bombing in Argentina." In 1992 the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires
was bombed.
"This pact is viewed by some people as a
step forward. This may be a step to the precipice. It will allow a very
unfortunate third attack," warned Borger.
The confrontation between Borger and
Fernandez came to a head on Saturday as the president took to the
national television airwaves and Twitter to defend the agreement.
"I read with concern the statements made
by Guillermo Borger, president of AMIA,on the deal with Iran. What do
you know to make a statement so terrible?" Fernandez asked on Twitter.
"If there was an attack planned related to the agreement with Iran, who
is the mastermind and the material author?"
Argentina is another Jewish community that ought to be thinking about making aliya (many of them did in the 1970's during the Peron era). This is only likely to get worse whether in terms of Kirchner's relationship with the community, her cuddling up to Iran, or the exoneration of mass murderers of Jews. In any event, the message to the Jewish community of Argentina is clear: You're not wanted.
This is actually typical behavior from Kirchner, who has been known to - literally - cuddle with some of the worst dictators the 'international community' has to offer (see the photos at the link). The open disdain for the lives of her own citizens is just a little more brazen.
Georg Franz Hein knew who he was: A German Jew who had been sent to London by his mother and gambled away the family fortune. But to everyone else, he was Peter Stevens, a pilot in the Royal Air Force who became one of the best escape artists among allied prisoners of war.
'Stevens' eventually settled in Canada, and it was not until some 17 years after his death that his son discovered his true identity.
I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com