Powered by WebAds

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Lawsuit threatened against Coca Cola for call to boycott Israel

I am old enough to remember when certain countries - including Israel - either had Coke or Pepsi available, but not both. That was because if you sold in Israel, you couldn't sell in Russia or the Arab world. One of the first transactions I worked on when I made aliya (immigrated to Israel) was a financing for the company that bought the rights to be the first to market Pepsi in this country.
Now, at least one Coca Cola franchisee would like to go back to those days, and Coca Cola has decided to give his views a platform. The franchisee is a 'Palestinian American' named Zahi Khouri, and he's the exclusive franchisee for Coca Cola in the 'West Bank' and Gaza. Khouri seems to think he can garner more business by issuing calls to boycott Israel (NOTE to those who still don't get that the goal of BDS is to destroy Israel: He wants to boycott ALL OF ISRAEL). And Coca Cola is giving him a platform to do so. Ronn Torossian reports.
On Coca-Cola’s website, one can read of an award that was recently presented to Zahi Khouri, CEO of Coca-Cola Palestine, founder of the Palestinian National Beverage Company and exclusive holder of the Coca-Cola franchise in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The beverage conglomerate’s blog “invites Khouri to share his optimism, grit and reflection” with their global readers.
One wonders if his reflections represent Coca-Cola as a whole; for the Palestinian-American entrepreneur supports a boycott of Israel and urges sanctions against the Jewish State.
...
In November 2014, The Jerusalem Post reported that “Coca-Cola plans to build its first factory in Gaza,” noting the company had invested $25 Million into its Palestinian area business in the past five years, with Mr. Khouri as a partner. At the time, Mr. Khouri said all the right things, including this memorable soundbite: “The only enemy of extremism is good jobs.” A deeper look at Mr. Khouri’s rhetoric, however, reveals an executive more in line with Gaza hardliners than has been portrayed in the press.
Perhaps at the time Coca-Cola was unaware of Mr. Khouri’s September 2014 op-ed in the Orlando Sentinel in which their partner & regional CEO noted that the “non-violent efforts of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) advocates make sense as a means to force Israel to recognize that the occupation is not cost-free.” Coca-Cola’s local partner suggested that “countries, like those in the European Union, could enforce their own laws against doing businesses with countries that violate human rights.”
Perhaps Mr. Khouri should re-read the Coca-Cola Code of Business Conduct for franchisees, which states, “because The Coca-Cola Company is incorporated in the United States, our employees around the world often are subject to U.S. laws.” In addition to it being morally wrong to boycott Israel, recent amendments by the U.S. House and Senate require U.S. trade negotiators to “discourage politically motivated actions” by foreign countries and international organizations that aim to “penalize or otherwise limit” commercial relations with Israel or “persons doing business in Israel or in territories controlled by Israel.” A regional CEO threatening to boycott America’s staunchest Mid-East ally is cause for concern on many levels for Coca-Cola.
Yet, Mr. Khouri flouts these regulations, noting in the Washington insider publication The Hill that “this Congress is now legislating against the Palestinian nonviolent action of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) as a means to secure Palestinian freedom.” He then urges Jewish Voices for Peace, the anti-Zionist organization funded by George Soros, to assist him in lobbying efforts in Washington, DC. Does he also meet with Coca-Cola lobbyists while in our nation’s capitol?
When advocating in favor of BDS, Mr. Khouri is careful to identify himself not with Coca-Cola but as, for example, a “Palestinian-American businessman,” as he did in his bio line on The Hill or as “chairman of Orlando-based Intram Investments and chairman of the Palestinian Tourism Co. in Ramallah,” as reads his bio in the Sentinel. (Multiple emails and calls to Coca-Cola, Mr. Khouri, and Palestinian National Beverage Company requesting comment for this story were not returned. If any responds, this story will be updated to include their viewpoint.)
One group has responded. No, it's not Coca Cola. It's Nitzana Darshan-Leitner's Israel Law Center, which is threatening to sue Coca Cola if it doesn't sever ties with Khouri.
“This letter is a warning to the Coca-Cola Company that it should rescind its franchise agreement with the Palestinian National Beverage Company, headed by Zahi Khouri, who openly advocates for BDS against Israel,” said a letter from the Israel Law Center to Mr. Mukhtar Kent, CEO of Coca Cola.
...
In its letter Monday, the Israel Law Center’s Nitsana Darshan-Leitner and US attorney Robert Tolchin argued that calls for a boycott violate the Anti-Racism Convention, as well as various state and federal laws. It also represents a breach of Coca-Cola Company’s own Code of Business Conduct, it claimed. The company’s ethics code, which the law center said binds its foreign subsidiaries as well, states, “The Company also must abide by US anti-boycott laws that prohibit companies from participating in any international boycott not sanctioned by the US government.”
The BDS movement “is inherently racist, anti-Semitic, biased and prejudicial and has an extremist agenda that unfairly singles out Israel and Jews. The BDS movement’s goal is solely the destruction of the State of Israel and its Jewish community. It masquerades as a human rights movement, but it is singularly fixated on Israel and Jews and ignores egregious human rights abuses that do not feed its anti-Israel agenda,” the Israeli NGO representatives wrote.
No response yet from Coca Cola. 

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 27, 2014

Fox turns down SodaStream Super Bowl ad with Scarlet Johansson

Fox News has turned down a SodaStream Super Bowl ad featuring Scarlet Johansson... because it mentions competitors Pepsi and Coke.

Let's go to the videotape.



So what's the problem with mentioning Coke and Pepsi?
SodaStream CEO Daniel Birnbaum accused Fox of rejecting the commercial "because they're afraid of Coke and Pepsi," USA Today reported.

Nevertheless, the commercial is likely to be aired, because Birnbaum said he had little choice but to cut the offending line. "If I could get my money back, I'd be happy to be out of that deal," he added.

"What are they afraid of?" asked Birnbaum. "Which advertiser in America doesn't mention a competitor? This is the kind of stuff that happens in China. I'm disappointed as an American."

The two soft-drink giants, longtime spenders on Super Bowl ads, are back in the game this year, and Pepsi also is sponsoring the halftime show.

Fox executives declined to comment. So did executives from PepsiCo. Coca-Cola spokeswoman Lauren Thompson said: "I can confirm we did not pressure Fox. Other than that, we don't comment on our competitors' efforts."
SodaStream had the same problem last year. 

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, February 01, 2013

Arab American groups call Coca Cola's Super Bowl ad 'racist'

I won't be staying up to watch the Super Bowl on Sunday night. With the 1:30 am start and 5:00 am finish, I am only willing to chance jet lag if my beloved Patriots are playing (which they are not this year).

But the ads that will be shown during the game are already up on YouTube, and Arab American groups are furious over this one by Coca Cola.

Let's go to the videotape (Hat Tip: MFS - The Other News). More after the video.



“Why is it that Arabs are always shown as either oil-rich sheiks, terrorists, or belly dancers?” said Warren David, president of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, or ADC.

Coca-Cola released an online teaser of the commercial last week, showing the Arab walking through a desert. He soon sees cowboys, Las Vegas showgirls and a motley crew fashioned after the marauders of the apocalyptic “Mad Max” film race by him to reach a gigantic bottle of Coke.

In its ad, Coke asks viewers to vote online on which characters should win the race. The online site does not allow a vote for the Arab character.

“The Coke commercial for the Super Ball is racist, portraying Arabs as backward and foolish Camel Jockeys, and they have no chance to win in the world,” Imam Ali Siddiqui, president of the Muslim Institute for Interfaith Studies, said in an email.

“What message is Coke sending with this?” asked Abed Ayoub, ADC’s director of legal and policy affairs. “By not including the Arab in the race, it is clear that the Arab is held to a different standard when compared to the other characters in the commercial,” he said.
Funny, there don't seem to be any Jews in that ad....

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

What do King & Spaulding and the Obama Justice Department have in common?

Forgive me for a post that seems way off topic, but I can envision this happening to Israel - certainly in Europe if not in the US.

The answer to the question asked in this post's title is that King & Spaulding and the Obama administration's Justice Department both believe that terrorists deserve to be represented by counsel, but the US House of Representatives does not.

What could go wrong?

Labels: , ,

Google