Powered by WebAds

Wednesday, December 07, 2011

The end of religious freedom?

Phyllis Chesler reports that the United States went a long way toward ending its support of religious freedom around the world last month. On November 18, the US chose not to extend the work of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the Durban Follies, constitutes a permanent delegation to the UN. The OIC was established in 1969. Its position is as follows: it seeks to
pursue as a matter of priority a common policy aimed at prevented defamation of Islam perpetrated under the pretext and justification of the freedom of expression in particular through media and internet.
In 2011, the 38th Conference, held in Kazakhstan, stated “deep concern over any activities carried out by certain governmental and non-governmental organizations supported by governments in order to attack OIC member states for political purposes and to further their foreign policy objectives in international forums.” The conference also denounced “media campaigns and fabrications made by some quarters in non-member states regarding the mistreatment of non-Muslim minorities and communities in the OIC member states under the slogans of religious freedoms and so on.”

In other words, attempting to help a Christian escape genocide in Egypt, Iraq, or Pakistan would be outlawed as would all work that reports on religious persecution. What I’m writing here would be criminalized. The Muslims who drafted this document want to do their gender cleansing without being exposed, stopped, or held liable for it. That’s the OIC at the UN.

The United States, to its credit, shunned the UN’s Durban III conference. However, in 2009, the Obama administration eliminated the phrases “Islamic extremism,” “Islamic terrorism,” and “terrorism” from national security strategy documents. We have also seen a quantum increase in fears about a non-existent “Islamophobia” and a similar quantum decrease in “official” fears about an escalating anti-Semitism which in the Middle East is potentially genocidal.

Many European politically correct/anti-racist governments agree with the OIC Conference. For example, European governments have prosecuted “thought crimes” which involve criticism of Islam or any objective presentation of Islam (honor killing, honor related violence, forced marriage, daughter and wife beating, etc.) that some Muslim somewhere finds offensive — in Holland, Austria, Germany, Denmark, Iceland etc. I myself have called this the death of free speech in Europe.

Recently, I was involved in the case of a Pakistani apostate, Khalid Saheed, who sought and was denied political asylum in Sweden. Predictably, he and his family have received death threats from Islamic fundamentalists. If Saheed and his family are sent back to Pakistan, they will be murdered for leaving Islam. This is the true state of religious tolerance in the Muslim world. There is no such freedom and USCRIF has boldly exposed and published this truth.

...

Perhaps there are simpler reasons involved in the death of USCRIF. The bill to continue funding it was held up by just one man, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill). Durbin may not necessarily oppose aiding religious minorities as much as he is in favor of delivering pork barrel to his constituents. Thus, unbelievably, only until or unless the Thomson Correctional Center in northwest Illinois is funded and/or funded for the purpose of holding Guantanamo Bay detainees, there can be no funding for religious freedom anywhere else on earth.
I am sure that certain readers of this blog will dismiss this as 'lies' and 'Islamophobia' and will dismiss me as an 'Islamophobe' or will claim that it doesn't 'represent Islam.' But you can't just dismiss it without presenting contrary facts, and certainly in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan (for starters) there are none.

Let's go to the videotape.



Thanks to Dick Durbin and the OIC Gulnaz is marrying her rapist. Shame on the western world.

Labels: , ,

2 Comments:

At 4:14 PM, Blogger Empress Trudy said...

I say give them their head. Let a Medieval Caliphate spread its arms far and wide across Europe. If 7/8ths of the million or so Jews left in Europe emigrate that's an entirely manageable problem. For everyone else, don a burqa, stop shaving, outlaw literacy and good luck with all of that.

 
At 2:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

am sure that certain readers of this blog will dismiss this as 'lies' and 'Islamophobia' and will dismiss me as an 'Islamophobe' or will claim that it doesn't 'represent Islam.'

Yes that is true, you are. Also Phylis Chesler, if she was so concerned about womens rights, why is she only focusing on Muslims? why not Christians, Hindus, Jews, buddhists? That is why it is Islamophobia. the pretence for womens rights is just an excuse. The real agenda is to malign Islam and Muslims, take away their rights so that they don't wield power or influence or to lessent he influence of Islam. That is a lost cause anyway, as the faith has the hand of God behind it. That is why despite your best efforts and LIES it grows.



But you can't just dismiss it without presenting contrary facts, and certainly in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan (for starters) there are none.

But again, you prove my point. This woman and her case has been roundly condemned in the Muslim world, including in her own country. Again you prove what i said above. Why don't you bring a case of an American Christian woman who is raped and forced to marry her victim? Or a Jewish one? or a Buddhist? or a Hindu?

What the hell does this have to do with the OIC and it's campaign to stop lies from Zionist Islamophobes?

As I said in the post yesterday, it's fine with us. If the OIC fails to cap Islamophobia because of free speech, then we will play by your rules, and better you at your own game. The OIC is the richest club in the world. It's combined wealth is greater than any other entity, and though member states may disagree with each other's politics, ALL OIC nations concur on Islamophobia.

The anti 'counter jihad' movement will make your 'counter jihad' look like an underpaid, band of hooligans.

We have the resources, the talent, we just don't do it because of our moral code, superior to yours. Or at least we won't do it, till all peaceful methods to combat have failed.


There will come a time, when the Islamophobia perpetrators will wish they had never even uttered the word Islam.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google