Hypocritical post, but typical of someone who supports every Islamophobe on the planet, including Nazi's so long as they direct their hate at Muslims.
Quite aside from the fact that you don't question why Holocaust denial is a crime in the same countries you mention above? That is denying freedom of speech to some who want to do that but can't.
The OIC isn't trying to suppress criticism of Islam, don't be riduculous. It's only seeking to put a cap on the lies and smears, coming from your buddies (all Islmaophobia that we are concered about is coming from Zionists)
Clinton knows that the alternative is. Either way, we will counter it. Two choices, I actually prefer the 2nd one.
1. This move by the OIC is the more sensible one.
2. If it can't come about no problem, as a last resort, we can do the same.
The only reason the OIC won't spend millions on defaming those who defame us, is because our religon forbids it. That is, until every reasonable effort has been tried and failed.
But if it comes down to it, we will spend billions on countering anti Islam propoganda, and no effort will be spared. That will be freedom of speech to beat freedom of speeches.
So take your pick. If you think the 'Arab Lobby' contols the USA now, you ain't seen nothing yet baby, we can bury the Islamophobia industury today, if it wasn't for our own moral code.
I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com
1 Comments:
Hypocritical post, but typical of someone who supports every Islamophobe on the planet, including Nazi's so long as they direct their hate at Muslims.
Quite aside from the fact that you don't question why Holocaust denial is a crime in the same countries you mention above? That is denying freedom of speech to some who want to do that but can't.
The OIC isn't trying to suppress criticism of Islam, don't be riduculous. It's only seeking to put a cap on the lies and smears, coming from your buddies (all Islmaophobia that we are concered about is coming from Zionists)
Clinton knows that the alternative is. Either way, we will counter it. Two choices, I actually prefer the 2nd one.
1. This move by the OIC is the more sensible one.
2. If it can't come about no problem, as a last resort, we can do the same.
The only reason the OIC won't spend millions on defaming those who defame us, is because our religon forbids it. That is, until every reasonable effort has been tried and failed.
But if it comes down to it, we will spend billions on countering anti Islam propoganda, and no effort will be spared. That will be freedom of speech to beat freedom of speeches.
So take your pick. If you think the 'Arab Lobby' contols the USA now, you ain't seen nothing yet baby, we can bury the Islamophobia industury today, if it wasn't for our own moral code.
Post a Comment
<< Home