Israel Matzav

My 'Palestinian' brothers and my other 'Palestinian' brothers

How many of you are old enough to remember the Bob Newhart show? "Hi, I'm Larry, this is my brother Darryl, and this is my other brother Darryl!"

Let's go to the videotape. More below the fold.



I thought of those guys when I read this by Khaled Abu Toameh.

The Palestinians are divided today into two camps – one that is radical and another that is less radical -- or "moderate" in the words of the West.

Kind of like Darryl and Darryl - two sides of the same coin, aren't they?

The radical camp is headed by Hamas and other extremist groups such as the Islamic Jihad organization.

This camp's message is: We want 100% of everything and we will not make any concessions to Israel. We want all the land, from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River. We want to replace Israel with an Islamic state where Jews who wish to could live as a minority.

There is no point in talking about the possibility of negotiating with this radical camp about peace, especially as its declared goal is to eliminate Israel -- not make peace with it.

The only thing Israel could talk to the radicals about is how and when to dismantle the Jewish state and send Israelis to Europe, Russia, the US and their Arab countries of origin.

The less radical camp, headed by the PLO and a minority of secular Palestinians, is also saying that it wants 100%, but only of the pre-1967 lines -– meaning the entire West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem.

Like the radicals, the "moderate" camp is also saying that it will not and cannot make any concessions to Israel on its territorial demands.

With such positions, it is hard to see how the peace process could lead to anything positive. The radicals do not want to negotiate with Israel because they do not recognize its right to exist and believe it should be wiped off the face of the earth. The so-called moderates say they are ready to return to the negotiating table, but only if Israel agrees in advance to give them 100% of their demands.

Yet the central problem is that even if Israel does accept all their demands, neither camp is willing to commit to ending the conflict. This is basically why the 2000 Camp David summit failed – because Yasser Arafat was not prepared to sign any document that called for end of conflict even after a peace deal were reached between Israel and the Palestinians.

Read the whole thing.

Abu Toameh has too much confidence in Israelis' acceptance of the 'two-state solution.' While most Israelis would probably still accept a 'two-state solution,' what they are willing to give to get there is far less than what Ehud Barak offered in 2000 and 2001 and far, far less than Ehud Olmert offered in 2008. And the 'Palestinians' found those offers to be unacceptable. The time for the 'two-state solution' seems to have passed.

Labels: Abu Mazen, Fatah, Hamas, Khaled Abu Toameh, two-state solution

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 7:32 PM