Powered by WebAds

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

And you thought there wouldn't be US boots on the ground in Libya - Part 2

Here's another indication that there may eventually be US troops on the ground in Libya.
During a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island asked Adm. James Stavridis about NATO putting forces into “post-Gadhafi” Libya to make sure the country doesn’t fall apart. Stavridis said he “wouldn’t say NATO’s considering it yet.” But because of NATO’s history of putting peacekeepers in the Balkans — as pictured above — “the possibility of a stabilization regime exists.”

So welcome to a new possible “endgame” for Libya. Western troops patrolling Libya’s cities during a a shaky transition after Moammar Gadhafi’s regime has fallen, however that’s supposed to happen. Thousands of NATO troops patrolled Bosnia and Kosovo’s tense streets for years. And Iraq and Afghanistan taught the U.S. and NATO very dearly that fierce insurgent conflict can follow the end of a brutal regime. In fact, it’s the moments after the regime falls that can be the most dangerous of all — especially if well-intentioned foreign troops become an object of local resentment.

In fact, Stavridis told Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma that he saw “flickers of intelligence” indicating “al-Qaeda [and] Hezbollah” have fighters amongst the Libyan rebels. The Supreme Allied Commander of NATO noted that the leadership of the rebels are “responsible men and women struggling against Col. Gadhafi” and couldn’t say if the terrorist element in the opposition is “significant.” But the U.S. knows precious little about who the Libyan rebels are.

The new prospect of NATO force on the ground in Libya seemed to alarm Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who got Stavridis to say that there’s “no discussion of the insertion of ground troops” in NATO circles. (And “to my knowledge” there aren’t troops there now, he said.) But Stavridis told Reed that the memory of the long NATO peacekeeping efforts in the Balkans is “in everyone’s mind.”
And the US isn't even running the show - NATO is.

What could go wrong?

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 8:40 AM, Blogger free said...

From the article: "... the U.S. knows precious little about who the Libyan rebels are." -------------- And yet we are supporting them???? What is going on not only with the leadership of my country [USA] but with our media not hammering President Obama with this??? Unbelievable!!!

 
At 10:08 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Libya is going to break apart into two countries. Why keep such hostile tribes together?

It would be a thankless mission. NATO should refrain from putting troops in Libya.

America has no business being there in the first place.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Google