Powered by WebAds

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

J Street's divisive new ad

J Street, the pro-Israel, pro-peace pro-Obama, somewhat Jewish lobby, has greeted Prime Minister Netanyahu with a new, divisive television ad (undoubtedly created by their friends at Fenton).

Let's go to the videotape.



The Weekly Standard rips the ad to shreds.
But here’s the thing: Those named as part of the ‘no’ team are also in favor of a two state solution to end the conflict in Israel.

Here’s Lieberman’s position:

Advancing the Middle East Peace Process. Senator Lieberman believes that the United States should continue to take an active role in negotiating a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Specifically, he maintains that a two-state solution – in which Israel lives side by side in peace with a democratic Palestinian state – ultimately provides the only appropriate framework for resolving this longstanding challenge.
Here’s Sarah Palin, from the 2008 vice presidential debate with Joe Biden:
PALIN: A two-state solution is the solution.
So, what we’re left with is a totally dishonest ad.

...

But perhaps the most despicable element of this ad is the use of an image showing General Petraeus in uniform and implying that he somehow supports J Street’s anti-Israel positions. In the past, the left has gone nuts whenever images of Petraeus were used in political ads to imply his endorsement or support -- and the Pentagon hasn’t taken kindly to it either.
Aren't you glad we have J Street to act as the enemy from within the 'pro-Israel' community? It's high time to rip their mask off and throw them out.

4 Comments:

At 6:17 PM, Blogger Daniel said...

The Three state kapo types like J-street are so full of sh-t. I am sick and tired of assimmilated intermarried treife eaters pretending to be loyal Jews and using the media to promote their anti-Jewish liberal agenda.
1. Why in the world did Bibi visit this anti semite muslim turned racist xtian in chief during the 3 weeks?
2. J street libs are more likely to have an intermarried kid than one who visits Israel.
3. J-street libs are more likely to have a gay kid than a kid who becomes an oleh.
4. What percent of J-street types ever send their kids for a gap year?
5 . Occasionally you'll see a comment posted on JPOST/YNET etal from a reform type claiming that if there is a three state solution many reformers will come to Israel. Wanna buy a bridge?

Since language is propaganda, we must now all use THREE STATE as an official term. I suppose J-Streeter are unaware that 3 ir miklot were in Jordan.

ps. my 18 year old will be in Reishit starting Aug 25. I put my money where my mouth is.

 
At 7:10 PM, Blogger biorabbi said...

Daniel, I'm laughing my ass off! Come on!!! A J Streeter's kid will more likely to be a gay kid than what? an AIPAC supporter's kid. As a physician, I'm not sure that it is true that liberal Jews sons are more likely to sing broadway show tunes and decorate interiors than conservative Jews. Sometimes the apple falls far from the tree. If your thesis, Daniel, is correct, than the sons of Jews for Palin should be the least likely to be like dress in drag. Still, I enjoyed your response(tell us what you really think about the treife eaters).

 
At 7:15 PM, Blogger biorabbi said...

BTW, my father, a strong supporter of Israel, eats occasional Treife when nobody's looking and married a pretty shiksa... both are liberal as hell, but I'm a conservative, Likud, Bibi supporter but I'm straight and married a staunchly conservative Jewess. But although I'm straight, I do like Barbara Streisand and Barry Manilov and sometimes sing show tunes(must be my parental treife eaters).

Daniel, I'm just kidding and take no offense and enjoyed your response and have sent it to my dad. You are right on the J streeters: it's just code for Jews who don't like Israel

 
At 3:29 AM, Blogger Daniel said...

Biorabbi-an oleh is someone who makes aliya(moves to Israel).Considering the low rate of aliya among Jewish Libs , I think my data holds up.
Also since the prevalence of Jewish Conservatism is directly proportionate to religiosity( studies also confirm with the xtians),and liberalism with lack of, there is a very high positive predictive value with frumkeit producing children who are not interior decorators. Of course there are always outliers.
Keep up the good work
)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google