Powered by WebAds

Sunday, April 04, 2010

Where 'engagement' is leading

As President Obama continues his futile efforts to 'engage' Iran, Rick Richman looks at North Korea for guidance on where things may be heading.
Watching U.S. diplomacy with North Korea, Iran can feel some confidence about what will happen if it completes its nuclear-weapons program: undoubtedly, we will still be steadfastly committed to getting talks with Iran going again; we will state that Iran knows what it has to do (let us process their nuclear fuel for them while we talk); we will repeat that our goal remains the denuclearization of the Middle East; and we will urge Iran to return to the negotiating table.

The engagement strategy is a unique contribution to American diplomacy: it is used only on adversaries (allies get less courteous treatment); it is never off the table; it remains there while other options are pursued; it will still be there when they fail; and it will continue even after it is overtaken by events. The Haaretz report ends with a small vignette indicating engagement may be somewhat harder later on:
When a senior representative from Pyongyang was asked in Moscow last month at an international conference on nuclear proliferation what assurances his country needed for its security, he said: “We do not have to talk. We have nuclear weapons.”
Read it all. More here.

1 Comments:

At 5:27 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Once Iran gets The Bomb - it won't need that "engagement" on offer from Obama.

What could go wrong indeed

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google