Powered by WebAds

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Rachel Corrie died to get the World's attention

Rachel Corrie's parents are here this week with four ISM terror supporters to testify in a lawsuit that the Corries have filed over their daughter's death. Lenny Ben David writes a letter to the Corries which, if they actually read it, might give them some second thoughts over who was responsible for their daughter's death.
And the third picture is of your earlier visit to the region to see where your daughter lived and died. You were met and honored by Yasser Arafat:
That is where you should have realized that you daughter was his pawn, another young idealist brainwashed into hating Israel. Arafat regaled in his “shahids,” the suicide bombers who blew up Israeli civilians. The New York Times documented the training of 25,000 Palestinian teens in the summer prior to launching the September 2000 intifada. Your daughter Rachel was another impressionable youth recruited for the Palestinian cause. I’m sure that is hard for you to believe, but read what her ISM buddy Joseph Smith believed:
“We knew there was a risk,” Smith said, “but we also knew it never happened in the two years that we (the ISM) have been working here. I knew we take lots of precautions so that it doesn’t happen, that if it did happen it would have to be an intentional act by a soldier, in which case it would bring a lot of publicity and significance to the cause.”
According to another account:
“Her death serves me more than it served her,” said one activist [unclear if the speaker is an IMS activist or a Hamas activist] at a Hamas funeral. “Going in front of the tanks was heroic. Her death will bring more attention than the other 2,000 martyrs.”
And Corrie herself discussed the possibility of an American activist’s death as a propaganda tool:
You just can’t imagine it unless you see it, and even then you are always well aware that your experience is not at all the reality: what with the difficulties the Israeli Army would face if they shot an unarmed U.S. citizen.
Finally, who sent your daughter into Gaza? The International Solidarity Movement, a Palestinian-led group, founded in August 2001 by Huwwaida Arraf, Adam Shapiro, Ghassan Andoni, Neta Golan, and George Rishmawi.

In July of 2004, the San Francisco Chronicle reported:
Rishmawi said the ISM’s main purpose is to increase international awareness of Palestinian suffering through the involvement of foreign activists, who pay their own way to the West Bank, where they are trained in various methods of nonviolent direct action.

“When Palestinians get shot by Israeli soldiers, no one is interested anymore,” Rishmawi said. “But if some of these foreign volunteers get shot or even killed, then the international media will sit up and take notice.”
Mr. and Mrs. Corrie, leave Israel with our deep condolences. It may be easier for you to live with the belief that Rachel was an idealistic fighter for peace. Maybe she was, but she was also used as a tool and discarded. ISM actually tried to market her as the “new Anne Frank.” Her life was wasted by a cruel, opportunistic, radical movement for whom the ends justify the means.

Sue them.
Rachel Corrie was used as canon fodder. Possibly willing canon fodder, but canon fodder all the same.

If any of you reading this knows Craig and Cindy Corrie, you might encourage them to read the whole thing.

5 Comments:

At 6:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's the problem?

Rachel Corrie received more flattery than she could handle.

 
At 6:29 PM, Blogger Red Tulips said...

I have literally zero sympathy for the Corries. They reap what they sowed. They taught their daughter to hate, so they have to deal with the consequences: a dead daughter, who died to protect a drug tunnel, aiding and abeting murderers. She died for a disgusting cause, a cause that she dedicated herself to, with her parents' help.

In fact, because her parents were clearly key to her brainwashing, I think they too have their daughter's blood on their hands.

 
At 12:25 PM, Blogger Mervyn Doobov said...

cannon fodder, not canon fodder.

Unless she was fodder for a particular brand of photographic equipment or for some ecclesiastical purpose.

 
At 4:13 AM, Blogger Politicsgirl101 said...

I believe her parents don't care about her anyway they seem to hate her! They just want fame,they don't love her!

 
At 4:16 AM, Blogger Politicsgirl101 said...

I believe they don't even care about her anyway,.I'll bet her parents don't even LOVE her! She's just a foolish-and naive girl!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google