Confirmed: IAEA covered for Iran
Anne Bayefsky reviews the new IAEA report on Iran, and asserts that what's most important about it is not that it confirms what we already suspected about Iran, but that it documents the complicity of the Nobel Peace Prize winning IAEA and its former director Mohamed ElBaradei in Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons. While Obama administration officials have attempted to spin the first report of IAEA chief Yukiya Amano, who took over last December, as a U.N. achievement, the implications of the evident U.N. deceit cannot be overstated. After all, the organization has a choke hold on global imaginations. In 2005 the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the IAEA and its then Director General Mohammed ElBaradei "for their efforts to prevent nuclear energy from being used for military purposes." It is now clear that this occurred at the very same time that ElBaradei was engaged in what may well prove to be the most lethal cover-up in human history.When the history of this era is written, one of the things that ought to be strikingly obvious is the extent to which the West was taken in by the Muslim practice of taqiyya. If we hadn't been so naive, we would not have allowed the likes of Mohamed ElBaradei to head the IAEA in the first place and we would not have trusted his word on Iran. Stupid Jews (and everyone else)!
For almost a decade, the IAEA and its director general stalled for time on behalf of Iran, with reports feigning ignorance of Iranian designs while leaving an escape hatch should the IAEA's disguise as a non-proliferation agency be blown. In February 2006 ElBaradei reported: "Although the Agency has not seen any diversion of nuclear material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, the Agency is not at this point in time in a position to conclude that there are no undeclared nuclear materials or activities in Iran. The process of drawing such a conclusion ... is a time consuming process."
In August 2006 ElBaradei reported: "the Agency remains unable to make further progress in its efforts to verify the correctness and completeness of Iran's declarations with a view to confirming the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme." In January 2007, in the midst of growing calls for sanctions, ElBaradei suggested a "time-out." In July 2007 ElBaradei concocted a deliberately nebulous deal between the IAEA and Iran "on the modality for resolving the remaining outstanding issues." In September 2007, with stiffer sanctions on the horizon, ElBaradei again called for a "time-out." In January 2008 the IAEA reported: "ElBaradei has repeatedly noted that ... the IAEA has not seen any diversion of material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices."
And on and on the reports and the carefully timed interviews went. The organization charged with stopping nuclear proliferation enabled it. This latest "revelation" should, therefore, be a shot heard round the world. Or at the very least, in the halls of Congress, where every year at least 5 billion American taxpayer dollars are directed to the United Nations in cash or in kind.
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 2:14 PM
4 Comments:
maybe so, but what i don't understand is why elbaradeh would do such a thing since it is so diametrically opposed to egyptian national interests, AND in light of his interest in the candidacy for the egyptian presidency.
in other words, why would he cover for iran getting nuclear weapons and then deal with that national threat (he personally incubated) as possible president of egypt? makes NO sense to me (and the argument that it not making sense is reason doesn't cut it).
This comment has been removed by the author.
"If we hadn't been so naive, we would not have allowed the likes of Mohamed ElBaradei to head the IAEA in the first place and we would not have trusted his word on Iran. Stupid Jews (and everyone else)!
We were not naive and we did know ElBaradei was taking us for a ride. However the powers that be,the ones who came to office with a pledge to keep the world safe (especially the ones who were thought to be the best friend of Israel) were the ones who could have exposed him. They choose otherwise. They choose to keep their mouths shut at the expense of Israel; at the expense of further generations of JEWS!
We are not stupid Jews, we are Jews without friends in high places. Friends who can at a whim, make a difference. Our history speaks of this. If anything many Jews continue deny that awful truth. This does not make us stupid but starving. (which causes blindness)
Face it if the IAEA covered for Iran, who did our 'supposed'friends cover for?
As a side note, all the articles, even the good ones which state Iran most likely will not use their nukes on Israel but as a vehicle to power is a rationalization of reality!!
The reality is, if in fact Iran use their nukes to hold the world by the neck, who do you think they will use those nukes on (to show whose boss) if one power with courage decides to not abide by the neck hold?
One of the best articles on how easily those in power deceive and lie.
"Obama’s OIC Envoy Didn’t Just Defend Al-Arian"
http://frontpagemag.com/
by Justin Elizabeth Tabler
Truth means nothing as long as those in power obliterate it. Ditto for those who protected the IAEA when they knew the IAEA covered for Iran.
Post a Comment
<< Home