Powered by WebAds

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Iron Dome to be deployed

Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile system had a successful test in southern Israel this week, and will hopefully be deployed along the Gaza border sometime this year.

The missile volleys which the system succeeded in intercepting included a number of rockets that mimicked Kassam and longer range Grad-model Katyusha rockets that are known to be in Hamas's arsenal.

The Iron Dome is supposed to be capable of intercepting all short-range rockets fired by Hamas in the Gaza Strip and by Hizbullah in Southern Lebanon. The system uses an advanced radar made by Elta that locates and tracks the rocket, which is then intercepted by a kinetic missile interceptor.

During the test, the radar succeeded in detecting which rockets were headed towards designated open fields and therefore did not launch an interceptor to destroy them.

The IDF has formed a new battalion that will be part of the IAF's Air Defense Division and will operate the Iron Dome. Prototypes have been supplied to the new unit, which has already begun training with the systems.

The IDF has also located positions along the Gaza border to be used as bases for the system, which includes a launcher and radar system. After completing the deployment of the system along the Gaza border, the IDF will begin deploying the system along the northern border with Lebanon.
But writing in Haaretz, Amos Harel says that Iron Dome's deployment does not mean that the danger at our Gaza border has come to an end.
It is hard to exaggerate the importance of the successful tests. Iron Dome is supposed to provide protection against missiles with a range of between four and 70 kilometers. That covers everything from mortar shells through Hamas' Qassams, Hezbollah's Katyusha rockets and even Iranian Fajr rockets, which have apparently made their way to the Gaza Strip. As such, it radically improves Israel's strategic position.

Nevertheless, protection of Israel's home front remains far from complete. First, Iron Dome has yet to be tested in a genuine attack. Second, Israel still lacks any additional missile batteries beyond the prototype just tested. Third, the intermediate layer of Israel's missile defense system - Magic Wand, which is supposed to handle missiles with longer ranges than those covered by Iron Dome but shorter than the long-range ballistic missiles covered by the Arrow - has yet to reach a similarly advanced stage of development, and is not expected to do so until 2012.

The first Iron Dome battery will be delivered to the air force in about six weeks and is slated, if all goes well, to become operational in May. A single missile battery is enough to protect a medium-sized city like Sderot.

The question is how many batteries the Israel Defense Forces will ultimately acquire, and when. It would take about 20 batteries, each costing some NIS 50 million, to defend the entire northern and southern border regions. That will require either diverting substantial funds from other defense projects or significantly increasing the defense budget.
Harel also is critical of the fact that Iron Dome took too long to complete (a criticism I made going back to 2006).
But for all the praise this achievement deserves, one criticism must be leveled: It should have happened much sooner. For years, the IDF refused to invest the necessary funds in developing Iron Dome, until former defense minister Amir Peretz finally forced it to do so. Had this been done sooner, not only would Israeli lives have been saved, but it might have been possible to avoid last winter's war in Gaza altogether and significantly reduce the damage from the Second Lebanon War in 2006.
Well, maybe.

6 Comments:

At 10:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

My idea of an iron dome to to place all of Gaza under one. No more missiles - period!

 
At 11:20 AM, Blogger Hutzpan said...

I'd like to point to the following phrase in another article of Haaretz's:

Iron Dome's success could improve the prospects of Israel eventually ceding West Bank land to the Palestinians, as Israeli officials have said that any withdrawals should be conditional on the deployment of a reliable defense against rocket attacks.

Is that the real purpose of this new defense system?

 
At 12:04 PM, Blogger Mr. Gerson said...

Defensive technologies are important, however the best form of defence is attack.

 
At 6:26 PM, Blogger NormanF said...

Hutzpan, the critical difference between Gaza and Yesha is the latter has mountainous terrain. Keep in mind no missile defense system will be 100% effective. And Iron Dome has yet to be tested in real world wartime conditions.

 
At 9:41 PM, Blogger Hutzpan said...

NormanF: I am afraid that the government might try to use the system (regardless of its actual effectiveness, or ineffectiveness) as a means of neutralizing those opponents of the retreat in Yesha whose objections are based on security considerations. The idea that now we fear nothing and can withdraw from Yesha can thus be sold to the public . That may be, I think, the real intention behind all the noise made by our MSM around the Iron Dome project.

 
At 3:29 PM, Blogger BernardZ said...

I agree with Hutzpan.

Then there are some more questions I would want answered.

Would an active retaliatory defence not be more effective and cheaper?

I am sure there are counter measures too against Iron Dome.

What happens if Iron Dome missiles fall and kill someone.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google