The 'road map' gutted
Last Saturday night, I noted a statement by the 'quartet' (the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations) that effectively gutted the reciprocity requirement contained in the 2003 'road map' to a 'Palestinian state.' In Friday's JPost, former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Dore Gold, who is a close Netanyahu adviser, elaborated on the 'quartet's action, which did much more than gut the reciprocity requirement. In general, the Quartet wanted to provide its own multilateral stamp of approval on President Barack Obama's UN address from September 22. It is to be remembered that Obama's remarks were unusual in their exceptionally long and detailed treatment of the Arab-Israel conflict: Roughly one-tenth of the speech was devoted to the issue of Israel and the Palestinians - far more than any other conflict in the world. He specifically proposed the establishment of "a viable, independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967."Read the whole thing.
In doing so, Obama adopted language that was not balanced out by an equal reference to UN Security Council Resolution 242, which appears in the Quartet road map and did not call for a full Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 lines.
OBAMA'S PUSH for the 1967 lines is also evident in his language during his UN address that "America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements."
...
The Quartet statement also goes out of its way to back the Palestinian Authority's new plan for building the institutions of a Palestinian state over the next 24 months - which was drafted by Palestinian Prime Minister Salaam Fayad. On the one hand, the Fayad Plan appears to address Israel's call for bottom-up peacemaking by tackling head-on the lack of sufficient self-governing bodies on the Palestinian side. On the other hand, it is a program that leads the Palestinian Authority seven-eighths of the way to an independent Palestinian state, leaving ambiguous how the Palestinians get to the finish line. What it leaves open is the possibility of a unilateral declaration of statehood by the Palestinians or by someone else.
...
ISRAELI DIPLOMACY is heading for unchartered waters, having to balance between negotiations with the Palestinians and the possibility of a new muscular multilateralism at the UN, led by the Quartet. What is clear is that if the Palestinians understand that they will receive a Palestinian state on a silver platter in two years time - that will additionally be based on the 1967 lines - then why should Mahmoud Abbas bother to negotiate or make a single concession?
Under such conditions, the Palestinians are likely to prefer advancing the campaign to delegitimize Israel, by increasingly turning to the International Criminal Court and other UN bodies. At the same time they will insist that the Obama administration put its own peace plan on the table that prejudges the outcome of negotiations by detailing future borders. An alternative that has been raised is an Obama side-letter to the Palestinians on borders that neutralizes Bush's past guarantees.
The only way to block this drift in diplomacy is for Israel to be very firm about its positions. It cannot accept any negotiating process with Abbas that allows the Palestinians to multilateralize Israeli-Palestinian differences while negotiators sit across from one another.
We may as well come right out and say it: Israel has an enemy in the White House.
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 7:18 PM
2 Comments:
`OBAMA'S PUSH for the 1967 lines is also evident in his language during his UN address that "America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.'
Mr. Obama, whilst you were elected president of my country, you do NOT speak for me. You do speak for the policy you represent, but as the opinion polls illustrate, on this issue, you do NOT speak for America. You do not represent America correctly here.
America respects the Zionist enterprise. It supports enabling Jews to have a place to go when the world turns dangerous. Like now.
Americans strongly support the state of Israel. Well more than 2 to 1 in current polling, and often higher when your friends, the 'palis' miss yet another opportunity for peace, and attack.
I won't fisk your complete ignorance of mideast history Mr. President. I will point out that every speech you make on this, shows you to be a product of your fellow travelers views.
It is a tragedy that in the 10 months you have been in office sir, you have wrought more damage to the US, more damage to the standing of the US, more damage to the economy, more damage to the safety of the world, than in the 4 years of hell in the Carter administration. I shudder to think what you will bring next.
Now please Mr. Obama, please ... stop. No more about the 'palis'. You have been lied to, been fed a vicious rhetoric, been handed a false history and information on the current state of this conflict. Please ... just stop. Its almost too painful to watch.
If Israel isn't careful, the Quartet may just force a Palestinian reichlet upon it over its objections.
Oh joy!
What could go wrong indeed
Post a Comment
<< Home