US may consider offering Abbas funds
The US State Department - and perhaps other sections of the United States government - are continuing to pretend that there were no 'elections' in the 'Palestinian Authority' on January 25, and that Hamas did not win the elections that did take place on that date. Moreover, their 'Palestinian of choice' -At a panel discussion during the annual conference of the Anti Defamation League (ADL), Assistant Secretary of State for Near East, David Welch, said that the US still sees Abbas as a partner that accepts the three conditions set forth by the international community in regard to the Middle East conflict and is interested in keeping open communication channels with him. [Why would the US want a partner who controls no one and nothing? CiJ]
"We will keep contact with President Abbas - we will also keep contact with any organizations that report directly to him or any independent Palestinian entities," Welch said.
The senior American diplomat in charge of the Middle East also added that "President Abbas has said yes, yes and yes to each of the three principles and he represents an important voice politically among Palestinians."
According to Welch, there is no immediate plan to provide Abbas with direct financial assistance "but we haven't ruled that out. We may or may not do that depending on what the proposition is. I think most of the international community probably will adopt the same position."
Pro-Israeli activists in the US have expressed concern over the possibility that in the future, the US will provide direct financial aid to the Palestinian president, fearing it may reach eventually the hands of the Hamas.
The new legislation, which is debated in Congress, allows the administration to provide direct assistance to the PA only if it was needed for conducting elections or for the protection of the Palestinian president.
Assistant Secretary Welch stressed that the US is not going to change its stand in regard to Hamas and that it insists that Hamas recognize Israel, stops violence and accepts the previous agreements, before being seen as a legitimate partner. [That's it? No disarming? No compensation for terror attacks. Just say "I agree" and they're accepted as a 'legitimate partner?' CiJ]
"I don't see any substantial movement or even any modest movement on the part of Hamas, now that it is in government, to accept any of the three conditions," Welch said, pointing out that though there are some differences in the approach of the international community towards the Middle East, there is solid support for the need that Hamas accept the three conditions before negotiating with them.
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 12:25 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home