Israel Matzav

French President Hollande declared 'persona non grata'

Knesset speaker Yuli Edelstein has declared French President Francois Hollande persona non grata for choosing to address university students in a visit here three weeks from now, rather than addressing the Knesset.

"Whoever disrespects the Knesset does not deserve the Knesset's respect," Edelstein wrote on Facebook. "International leaders cannot belittle the Knesset, the elected parliament of the State of Israel, and ignore it. As speaker of the Knesset I am determined to protect the dignity of our nation and its representatives, the MKs. I will not allow Israeli democracy to be humiliated and turned into a doormat."

Then why not go all the way and not allow him into the country? (Answer: Edelstein doesn't have the power to do that). This sounds a bit like the mirror image of Groucho Marx's famous quip....

Let's go to the videotape. The story starts at the 4:00 mark.



And if the story of Francois Hollande sounds familiar to you, it should. There was another 'world leader' who recently addressed university students rather than the Knesset. At the time, I wrote:

Given his refusal to speak at the Knesset as well, maybe Obama is trying to avoid recognizing the State of Israel. If so, that should be deeply troubling to all Israelis... I don't  why we invited him, but maybe we can still retract....

So what's the difference? Why wasn't Obama at least declared persona non grata in the Knesset? How's this for a lame excuse....

As for how Hollande is different from US President Barack Obama, who also chose to address students and not the Knesset, Edelstein said he was disappointed then, too, but Obama visited Israel shortly after the government was formed and the situation in the Knesset was messier than it is now.

Right.... The person who is going to 'suffer' from this is not Hollande, but rather French Ambassador to Israel, Patrick Maisonnave.

New French Ambassador to Israel Patrick Maisonnave will not be invited to any official Knesset ceremonies, nor will any other French dignitaries or ministers visiting Israel.

"There are plenty of events in universities. I'm sure the French officials will be too busy to find time for the Knesset," Edelstein remarked sarcastically.

And the French reaction?

A French Embassy spokeswoman said she was "surprised" to see Edelstein's reaction, because Hollande's schedule is not finalized yet.

"There is no need to react like this. The president wants to show his attachment to Israeli democracy and its representatives and wants to go to the Knesset. We are in touch with the Knesset to find the best time for [Hollande] to come, working with the Knesset's scheduling constraints. We're working on options and trying to be accommodating," the French Embassy spokeswoman stated.

Isn't it the Knesset that would need to be accommodating in this case? After all, they are the would-be hosts.

Don't get me wrong - I'm all in favor of banning Hollande from the Knesset for this. In fact, I'm in favor of banning him from the country altogether if he won't come address the Knesset.

But we should have done the same to Obama. The mistake was allowing Obama to set the precedent of going over the heads of Israel's elected representatives in the form of a speech to 'university students.'

Labels: Barack Hussein Obama, Francois Hollande, Israeli Knesset, persona non grata, Yuli Edelstein

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 3:21 PM 1 comments

US reshuffling diplomats in light of Wikileaks

I suppose this was inevitable. The United States is going to have to re-shuffle some of its diplomatic personnel in light of the Wikileaks document dump.

The shakeups are most likely at embassies where U.S. diplomats and other officials wrote classified cables—made public by WikiLeaks over the last week, or soon to be made public, with the Americans identified by name and title—in which they were harshly critical of corrupt or incompetent local government leaders.

Officials were reluctant to identify specific diplomats who might have to be removed from their posts. But they did not deny there were obvious candidates, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Gene Cretz, a highly respected career diplomat who wrote in a 2009 cable—revealed in the initial WikiLeaks dump—that Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi never travels without his "voluptuous blond" Ukrainian nurse.

"That's another part of the tragedy of this," said a senior U.S. national-security official. "We're going to have to pull out some of our best people—the diplomats who best represented the United States and were the most thoughtful in their analysis—because they dared to report back the truth about the nations in which they serve."

The State Department acknowledges that the WikiLeaks dump has done damage to American foreign policy, a problem that is likely to be compounded by the withdrawal of U.S. diplomats and other embassy officials who cannot be easily replaced because they are—not surprisingly—among the government's best-trained specialists on the foreign nations and regions where they are now posted.

Administration officials say that while some foreign governments have expressed outrage over the comments made in diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks—among them, NATO allies France, Italy, and Turkey, as well as Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia—there has been no formal move by those governments so far to force the ouster of U.S. diplomats identified in the cables.

"We think it's only a matter of time, though," predicted a senior official. "You're bound to see some PNG-ing of our diplomats." (He was referring to the diplomatic term "persona non grata," applied when a government demands the removal of an unwelcome foreign diplomat.)

I assume that the State Department has enough Arabists left to replace the ones who are being withdrawn. What could go wrong?

Labels: persona non grata, Wikileaks

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 10:06 AM 0 comments