Did the IRS act on behalf of the 'Palestinians'?
Rick Richman raises the possibility that exaggerated IRS scrutiny of applications for tax-exempt status by pro-Israel groups may have been undertaken
at the behest of the 'Palestinians.' The proof is in the 'Palestine papers' published by al-Jazeera in 2011.
At the June 16 meeting, Erekat said Benjamin Netanyahu’s June 14 Bar-Ilan speech
had sought to put the Palestinians on the defensive. Netanyahu endorsed
a two-state solution and stated that in the meantime, “we have no
intention of building new settlements or of expropriating additional
land for existing settlements,” but would “enable the residents to live
normal lives.” He urged the Palestinians to engage in immediate
negotiations, without preconditions. Erekat wanted to respond to the
speech with a letter to the U.S. that would cite the number of
individual housing units under construction. Dr. Mohammed Shtayyed made an additional suggestion to Erekat:
“We should also focus on the government incentives to settlers: loans
without interest, land for free, agricultural subsidies in the Jordan
valley. We can’t stop a pregnant lady from having a baby, but look at
what we can do. We should look at the 501(c)(3) organizations in the
States that make donations to settlers. Let the US administration
investigate this.” [Emphasis added].
Shatayyed was wrong about Israeli government incentives, which had
been terminated by Israel during the Bush administration, as part of a
negotiated arrangement (detailed by Elliott Abrams in Tested by Zion)
allowing new construction only within already built-up areas, which
permitted normal growth without an increase in the Israeli “footprint”
in the territories. Given our evolving knowledge of how the IRS operated
under Obama, however, it seems possible the Palestinians followed
through on Shtayyed’s other suggestion, asking the administration to
investigate pro-Israeli groups.
Hmmm.
Labels: Barack Hussein Obama, Internal Revenue Service, Palestine papers, Palestinians, Z Street
How the 'Palestinians' wiggled out of a peace agreement
JPost does a good job of putting together Condoleeza Rice's memoirs and the 'Palestine papers' to present a pretty clear picture of how the 'Palestinians' managed to avoid reaching a 'peace agreement' with Ehud K. Olmert. Recall that Rice described what Olmert offered in a
private dinner between the two of them.
Here's what happened next.
Rice recalled her incredulity: “Am I really hearing this? I wondered. Is the Israeli prime minister saying that he’ll divide Jerusalem and put an international body in charge of the Holy sites? Concentrate. Write this down. No, don’t write it down. What if it leaks? It can’t leak; it’s just the two of us.”
Rice said that she visited Abbas in Ramallah the next day. “I sketched out the details of Olmert’s proposal and told him how the prime minister wanted to proceed. Abbas started negotiating immediately. “I can’t tell four million Palestinians that only 5,000 of them can go home,” he said.”
While Rice is silent on the ensuing breakdown of talks – missing pieces are actually supplied by the Palestine Papers – documents memorializing 10 years of Palestinian-Israeli negotiations that were stolen from Saeb Erekat’s office and posted on al-Jazeera’s website last January.
Although Palestinian negotiators spoke publicly about compromise on refugees, privately they spoke of the “right of return” as a matter of individual choice that would have to be extended to each of over seven million people and with Palestinians retaining the open-ended right to try to negotiate additional “returns” beyond any number initially agreed upon in a peace treaty.
Abbas was simply unprepared to accept any offer that did not allow for the “right of return.”
Rice recounted how on September 16, 2008 Olmert presented Abbas with a groundbreaking offer for a two-state solution including a map outlining the territory of a Palestinian state. Rice confirmed reports that Olmert insisted that Abbas sign then and there, but that Abbas “demurred, wanting to consult his experts before signing.”
Olmert, Rice said, refused to give Abbas the map – a fact that the Palestinians have said proves that Olmert’s offer was not serious.
But the Palestine Papers indicate that on September 16, the Palestinians drew-up a map that seems to outline with great specificity the offer made by Olmert, in spite of the fact that they complained he would not give them a copy of the map.
Abbas asked for a meeting the next day with his advisers present.
The meeting the next day was never held – Rice did not say why, but Olmert has since said that he received a call from Saeb Erekat requesting that the meeting be postponed.
The US administration seems to have been unaware that in preparation for the September 16 meeting the PA was trying to generate escape plans from reaching a binding agreement with Olmert, while at the same time avoiding being blamed for not reaching a final status agreement.
“SE [PA Negotiator Saeb Erekat] thinks there are three ways [Abbas] could respond: (1) Give [Olmert] our Framework Agreement on Permanent Status, (2) Issue general communique about Annapolis progress, (3) Simply say no to the offer,” one September 9, 2008 memo from Hala Rasheed read.
“He wants us to think up other ways to respond. Whatever we propose, he wants to make sure that: (a) we are not blamed, (b) [negotiations] are uninterrupted, and (c) no submission is made that we cannot retract.”
A memo to other NSU members dated September 16 from Wassim Khazmo, a communications adviser on the PA negotiating team, revealed that Palestinians intended to treat the September 16 meeting as “ceremonial” rather than directed toward advancing negotiations and possibly reaching a peace agreement.
“In order to avoid the blame game, the President today is going with a positive attitude, where he will ask more questions from Olmert on his offer, and he will tell him that the Palestinians will respond later,” Khazmo wrote.
Khazmo was particularly concerned that Abbas avoid what he described as “Olmert’s media stunts.”
Anyone still think the 'Palestinians' want peace?
I would love to hear Rice's reaction to this.
Labels: Abu Mazen, Condoleeza Rice, Ehud K. Olmert, final status negotiations, Negotiations Support Unit, Palestine papers
