Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs' new 'hasbara' video
I've seen some criticism of this video on social media, but I actually think it's great and urge you all to spend three minutes or so watching it.
Let's go to the videotape.
Can't really argue with three quarters of a million views in three days, can you?
Labels: hasbara, Israel is a Jewish state, Israel is my home, Israel's Foreign Ministry
ISIS recognizes the 'Jewish state'
ISIS - the Islamic State terror organization - has announced that first it will destroy Hamas rule in Gaza due to Hamas' eschewing global jihad, and then it will destroy (God Forbid) the '
Jewish state' (yes, they called it that).
The video statement, issued from an Islamic State stronghold in
Syria, was a rare public challenge to Hamas, which has been cracking
down on jihadis in Gaza who oppose its truces with Israel and
reconciliation with the U.S.-backed rival Palestinian faction Fatah. "We
will uproot the state of the Jews (Israel) and you and Fatah, and all
of the secularists are nothing and you will be over-run by our creeping
multitudes," said a masked Islamic State member in the message addressed
to the "tyrants of Hamas". "The rule of shariah (Islamic law) will be
implemented in Gaza, in spite of you. We swear that what is happening in
the Levant today, and in particular the Yarmouk camp, will happen in
Gaza," he said, referring to Islamic State advances in Syria, including
in a Damascus district founded by Palestinian refugees.
Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL, has also
taken over swathes of Iraq and has claimed attacks in Egypt, Libya,
Tunisia and Yemen. Hamas is an Islamist movement that shares the
jihadis' hostility to Israel but not their quest for a global religious
war, defining itself more within the framework of Palestinian
nationalism. Deemed a terrorist group by Israel, the United States and
the European Union, and viewed by neighbouring Arab power Egypt as a
regional security threat, Hamas's struggle against ISIS-linked jihadis
has not won sympathy abroad.
Israel's intelligence minister, Israel Katz, accused
Hamas on Tuesday of partnering with Islamic State affiliates in the
Egyptian Sinai - a charge long denied by the Palestinian group. "There
is cooperation between them in the realm of weapons smuggling and
terrorist attacks. The Egyptians know this, and the Saudis," Katz told a
Tel Aviv conference organised by the Israel Defense journal. "At the
same time, within Gaza, ISIS has been flouting Hamas. But they have common cause against the Jews, in Israel or abroad."
It's all about tribalism folks. At the end of the day, these people have no loyalties outside their own families and clans. They will murder everyone else without a second thought.
Labels: Gaza, Hamas, ISIS, Islamic State, Israel is a Jewish state
With friends like this...
Does Jodi really think she's defending our 'right to exist' with comments like this? The reality is that for Jewish Israelis, there is very little difference between 'Israel as a Jewish state' and Israel. I doubt we'd last six months here with the Arabs in charge.
And I doubt we'd last much longer if we went back to the 1949 armistice lines and allowed the establishment of a 'Palestinian state' in the parts of Israel that are over the 'green line.'
Labels: Israel is a Jewish state, Jodi Rudoren, Palestinian state RIGHT NOW syndrome, two-state solution
If Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people, why can't we say so?
Silly me.
I always thought we were a Jewish state. We have a Jewish calendar. Our holidays are the Jewish holidays that have been existent for three thousand years (with one addition). Our day of rest is Saturday. So what's wrong with saying that we're a Jewish state? Why does the world go into such a rage over that simple declaration, while it doesn't care that there are Islamic states (which have made themselves free of Jews) and Christian states? This is the
New York Times.
A nationalities bill has long been sought by Israel’s right wing, and
the initial draft they produced downgraded Arabic from an official
language to one with “special status.” That and other antagonistic
elements are likely to be dropped from the version that reaches
Parliament.
But in this time of high tensions and violence between Jews and Arabs,
incited by competing claims to the sacred site in the heart of Jerusalem
— called the Temple Mount by Jews and Noble Sanctuary by Muslims — any
measure that claims a pre-eminent status for Jews can only add fuel to
the fire.
Mr.
Netanyahu says that the nationality bill is necessary because there
were so many challenges to Israel’s existence. But it is hard to see how
a law would put a stop to that. There is also speculation in the
Israeli press that the prime minister has been pushing the bill as a
political sop to right-wing members of his fractious coalition — indeed,
the cabinet vote was split 14 to 6 along ideological lines, with two
centrist parties opposing it.
The
political battle could yet bring the government down. Neither argument
justifies a fundamental change to Israeli law and guiding principles.
Having
experienced the grievous legacies created when a government diminishes
the rights of its people, we know this not the path that Israel should
take.
Diminishes the rights of its people? How so? No one is going to be forced to be Jewish, to keep the Sabbath, or to keep the Jewish holidays any more so than they are today. What the law does is to instruct the 'supreme court' to stop intruding into areas where it doesn't belong by claiming to protect democracy at the expense of Jewish observance.
Who opposes this bill? Mostly people outside Israel (isn't it funny that the Times thinks that we're the only democracy in the world that isn't capable of deciding things for itself?).
Jeff Dunetz got it right.
The critics of the “Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People,”
bills coming from two places, liberal in observance and secular Jews who
believe it is possible to separate Jewishness from the religion, and
media sources that will criticize Israel for anything she does.
Truth be told, Israel cannot demand that the Palestinians recognize her
as the “Jewish State,” if Israel herself doesn’t recognize it as a
Jewish State.
As long as the bill recognizes individual rights and freedom and
continues to allow everyone equal voting rights, Israel will remain what
it always has been a Democratic and Jewish State.
Indeed.
Labels: Israel is a Jewish state, New York Times, Supreme Court
Funny you should mention that
During a wild cabinet debate over a controversial bill that would - get this -
declare Israel to be a Jewish state, Yair,
son of Tommy Lapid came up with this argument against the bill (quote from first link).
Lapid recounted speaking with the family of Zidan Saif, the Druse
police officer who was killed defending Jewish worshipers in the
Jerusalem synagogue massacre last week.
“What will we tell them, that [Saif] is a second-rate citizen?” he asked.
Funny you should mention that, because the Druze community in Israel is
all in favor of Israel being a Jewish state.
Israeli Druze “are not Palestinians,” a Druze leader said regarding a proposed law to officially codify Israel’s status as a “Jewish state.”
As opposed to Muslim Arabs, members of the Druze community tend to be pro-Israel.
“We are not Palestinians and do not have religious or cultural
connections with them, but are full Israeli citizens. I want the state
to be a Jewish state and not one of ‘all its citizens,’” said Atta
Farhat, the head of the Druze Zionist Council for Israel, according to
the Jerusalem Post.
Farhat said Jews “respect others and their way of life.”
“We see what is happening in Iraq, Egypt, and other Arab countries.
We don’t want to live under a government of darkness, but where we have
freedom,” added Farhat.
Hmmm.
Labels: Druze, Israel is a Jewish state, Yair Lapid
Netanyahu's Livni obsession coming to an end?
Maybe Prime Minister Netanyahu
saw the poll numbers that have her barely making it into the next Knesset. Or maybe he finally figured out what the rest of us did a long time ago: Tzipi Livni is about '
me, me, me,' and while she may have lots of
friends on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington and in Foggy Bottom, she was very few friends in Israel. Whichever it is, at long last, Netanyahu may finally have come to the realization that
he doesn't need to pander to Tzipi Livni - and he may be hurting himself politically by continuing to do so.
"On Sunday I will bring the Jewish State Law to the Cabinet, in order
to provide a response to all those who doubt the right of Jews to have
their own nation-state in the state of Israel. The Jewish State Law is a
foundation in securing our rights in our country," Netanyahu said.
According to the Jewish State Law, which was proposed by MK Ze’ev
Elkin (Likud) and is backed by the Jewish Home party, all Jewish schools
will teach Jewish history as well as Jewish tradition and heritage.
Hebrew will be recognized as the only official language in Israel.
Arabic, which as of now is considered an official language in Israel,
will instead be given special status.
The bill also declares that the State of Israel is the national home
of the Jewish people, in which a Jew can exercise his desire for
self-determination in accordance with his historical legacy. This right
to exercise national self-determination will be provided to Jewish
people only.
However, every resident, regardless of religion and nationality, will
be entitled to preserve his or her heritage, culture and language.
The bill came before the Ministerial Committee for Legislation on
Sunday, but Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, who opposes the law, removed it from the agenda
by purposely wasting time at the meeting, leaving only the last few
minutes for a hurried discussion of the law before announcing that the
debate on it is to be put off for a later date.
Livni has outsized influence on the government - or at least she has until now. She is Justice Minister, a position that is probably ministry number 5 on the totem pole (after the Prime Minister, and Defense, Foreign and Finance), despite the fact that the party she leads has only six seats in the current Knesset. It's long past time for that to stop.
Labels: Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel is a Jewish state, Politics, Tzipi Livni
The one-state solution is on our doorstep
David Goldman argues that because of changing demographics in the Middle East, the one-state solution is on our doorstep. Only one state is capable of ruling Judea and Samaria.
That state is Israel.
In the background of the region’s disrupted
demographics, a great demographic change overshadows the actions of all
the contenders. That is decline of Muslim fertility, and the unexpected
rise in Jewish fertility. The fall in Muslim birth rate is most extreme
in Iran and Turkey, with different but related consequences. When
Ayatollah Khomeini took power in 1979, the average Iranian woman had
seven children; today the total fertility rate has fallen to just 1.6
children, the sharpest drop in demographic history. Iran still has a
young population, but it has no children to succeed them. By mid-century
Iran will have a higher proportion of elderly dependents than Europe,
an impossible and unprecedented burden for a poor country. Iran’s sudden
aging will be followed by Turkey, Algeria, and Tunisia.
...
Israel is the great exception to the decline in fertility from North Africa to Iran, as I argued in a 2011 essay
for Tablet magazine. The evidence is now overwhelming that a Jewish
majority between the Jordan River and the sea is baked in the cake.
The CIA World Factbook estimates
total fertility of Arabs in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza at just 2.83 in
2014, versus 3.05 in 2011. The total fertility of Israeli Jews,
meanwhile, has risen above three children per female. Yakov Faitelson reported in the Middle East Quarterly:
From the beginning of the twenty-first century the TFR of
Israeli Muslims decreased considerably, from 4.7 in 2000 to 3.5
children per woman in 2011. The TFR of all Arabs decreased still further
to 3.3 children per woman, very close to the 3.09 for Jews born in
Israel. In November 2011, a new comprehensive ICBS projection was
published in which the government office admitted that in the past it
had overestimated Israeli Arab fertility and underestimated Jewish
fertility.
Jewish immigration is consistently positive and accelerating, while Palestinian emigration, at an estimated 10,000 per year
since 1967, is reducing the total Arab population west of the Jordan
River. Palestine Authority data exaggerated Arab numbers in Judea and
Samaria by about 30 percent, or 648,000 people, as of the 1997 census.
As Caroline Glick observes in her 2014 book The Israeli Solution,
Jews will constitute a 60 percent majority between the river and the
sea, and “some anticipate that due almost entirely to Jewish
immigration, Jews could comprise an 80 percent majority within the 1949
armistice lines and Judea and Samaria by 2035.”
Israel therefore has little fear demographically from annexation. Net
Jewish immigration and net Arab emigration will combine with higher
Jewish fertility to establish a Jewish supermajority over time. The
character of the West Bank population is changing: It is becoming older
and more educated, and increasing numbers of Arabs are benefiting from
the strong Israeli economy. Over time, West Bank Arabs may embrace
Israeli citizenship—when it is offered—as firmly as their counterparts
inside the Green Line. The so-called apartheid issue is a canard.
Israeli Arabs lived under martial law between the end of the War of
Independence in 1949 and 1966, and no one spoke of apartheid. Israel’s
most pressing problem in the near future may be Arab refugees trying to
get in.
As a non-Israeli, I do not wish to recommend a particular course of
action to Israel’s government. But the notion that the Palestinians
could stay clear of the riptide that has engulfed their neighbors was
fanciful to begin with and has now been trampled by events. Over the
past two decades, since the Oslo agreements were signed, the Palestine
Authority shown little ability to govern anything. After Egypt’s
military government suppressed the Muslim Brotherhood, it turned
viciously against the Brotherhood’s Palestinian wing, Hamas, and
blockaded Gaza. If the PA were capable of ruling the West Bank, it would
have allied with Egypt and Saudi Arabia to further isolate Hamas:
Instead the PA formed a national unity government with Hamas. Events
have shown that the PA cannot rule without Hamas, and it cannot rule
with Hamas; it can neither support nor suppress terrorism on the West
Bank. The inability of the Palestine Authority to govern, the inability
of Hamas to distance itself from its patron in Tehran, and the collapse
of the surrounding states eventually will require Israel to assume
control over the West Bank. This time the Israelis will stay.
Israel can’t rely on the PA to conduct counterterrorism operations
against Hamas, its coalition partner. Israel’s border with the Hashemite
Kingdom in the Jordan Valley, meanwhile, has become a strategic pivot.
ISIS is now operating in strength at the common border of Israel, Syria,
Jordan, and occupied Iraqi-Syrian border towns close to the common
frontier with Jordan. Jordan’s own security requires a strong IDF
presence on its western border.
When Israel absorbs Judea and Samaria—and it is a when, not an if—the
chancelleries of the West will wag their fingers, and the Gulf States
will breathe a sigh of relief.
The historical homeland of the Jewish people
will pass into Israeli sovereignty not because the national-religious
will it to be so, or because an Israeli government seeks territorial
aggrandizement, but because Israel will be the last man standing in the
region, the only state able to govern Judea and Samaria, and the only
military force capable of securing its borders. It will happen without
fanfare, de facto rather than de jure, at some moment in the
not-too-distant future when the foreign ministries of the West are
locked in crisis session over Iraq or Syria. And it will happen with the
tacit support of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.
Israeli authority will replace the feckless regime of the Palestine
Authority in order to maintain public order and ensure that the
electricity works, and the roads are secure, and that bands of jihadist
marauders or Shiite terrorists do not massacre entire villages; this
action will elicit the reflex condemnation from bored and dispirited
Western diplomats. The realization of the Zionist dream will then be
consummated not with a bang, but a whimper; the bangs will be much
louder elsewhere.
Read the whole thing.
Labels: demography, Egypt, Iran, Israel is a Jewish state, Jordan, Judea and Samaria, Libya, one-state solution, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey
'We were incredibly stupid'
In a piece in Haaretz which is thus far
only out in Hebrew, Shlomo Avineri, an icon of the Israeli Left (no, that's not him in the picture - it's our main Leftist dufus), tells readers, "We were incredibly stupid.... We thought they wanted a state, and a two-state solution, but it turns out that they want to destroy Israel, because they cannot/will not accept any form of Jewish national self-determination." As my kids like to say at such times "Boker Tov Eliyahu" (Good morning Elijah).
Of course, Avineri reaches the wrong conclusion (he calls for a redeployment of IDF forces in Judea and Samaria, removing the remainder of the blockade on Gaza, and a thinning of the civilian population by paying Jewish residents to leave Judea and Samaria), but the mea culpa with respect to Oslo and the 'Palestinians' intentions is fascinating.
I have the entire article in Hebrew (it was sent to me by email). I'm translating the key paragraphs below:
The initiators of Oslo and the process' supporters saw the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a conflict between two national movements, and believed - as I believed - that in direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO, a solution could be found to the territorial and strategic issues that are the source of the dispute between the two movements. It was not simple to persuade Israelis - and even the Labor party - that there was a national movement on the other side, and that although it had terrorist aspects, at heart it is entitled to fulfill its independent national self-definition, just like Zionism. The viewpoints of Golda Meir on the subject ("there is no Palestinian nation") have not been forgotten, and the fact that the initiators of Oslo managed to overcome this tradition of denial, to which even the Labor party was a partner, was an accomplishment.
But the basis of this concept had a mistake. All of those who supported the Oslo process believed that we were talking about a dispute between two national movements, and that the other side felt the same way.
We were mistaken.
The Palestinian side does not believe that we are talking about a dispute between two national movements: It believes that we are talking about a dispute between one national movement - the Palestinian - and a colonial imperialistic entity that will eventually die off. Therefore, the parallel that appears in the Palestinian textbooks is Algeria. It isn't the Israeli presence on the West Bank that is Algeria, but rather the entire Israel is Algeria, and the Israelis will disappear one way or the other, just like the French settlers were expelled from Algeria.
This is the reason why the Palestinian title for the two-state solution is different than the Israeli version. The Israeli stance talks about "two states for two peoples" but in the Palestinian version the phrase "for two peoples" does not appear. It only talks about "two states." If someone thinks that this is just poor phrasing, he should ask his Palestinian counterpart to express an opinion about the "two states for two peoples" version and he will sooner or later get the answer that there is no Jewish people. This is also the reason why the Palestinians refused the version suggested by [John] Kerry "an agreement between two nation states."
The truth is - and every Oslo supporter must recognize it - that in the Palestinian narrative, the Jews are not a people or a nation, but only a religious group, and therefore they are not entitled to a state. This is also the reason for the across-the-board and uncompromising opposition of the Palestinian side to recognizing the State of Israel as the State of the Jewish People. Even those who believe that Benjamin Netanyahu raised the topic only to complicate the negotiations, must contend with the fact that the Palestinian refusal to contend with the topic derives from the simple reason that the Palestinians believe that there is no Jewish people.
The source of the dispute is not borders, settlements or even Jerusalem. And of course, this is connected to the Palestinian refusal to waive the principle of the right of return. There are good reasons to criticize the Netanyahu government's behavior during US Secretary of State John Kerry's efforts to revive the negotiations, but to ignore these deep-seeded views constitutes a lack of intellectual honesty.
Wow. What an epiphany!
Labels: Israel is a Jewish state, Israeli Left, Middle East peace process, Oslo accords, two-state solution
Meet the demographic doomsayer
I frequently post here about the work of Yoram Ettinger in proving that the demographic doomsayers are wrong. But who are the demographic doomsayers and what do they say? Meet Arnon Sofer. The picture above is the front page of Yediot Aharonot magazine from July 1987. The prediction? "In 2000: Israel will not be Jewish."
He sure got
that one wrong.
So why does anyone still believe him today? Because they need an excuse to expel Jews from their homeland....
Labels: Arnon Soffer, demography, Israel is a Jewish state, Yoram Ettinger
Sad, but unfortunately true
You mean to tell me that '
moderate' '
Palestinian' President
Mahmoud Abbas Abu Mazen has a better idea of what it means to be a Jew than
Tzipi Livni? I'm shocked. Just shocked.
More
here.
(Cartoon translation
Livni: We want you to recognize us as a Jewish state.
Abu Bluff: Do you keep the Sabbath?
Livni: No, but....
Abu Bluff: Kashruth?
Livni: No, but....
Abu Bluff: [Fast on Yom] Kippur?
Livni: No, but....
Abu Bluff: Then what do you want from me? Huh?)
Labels: Abu Mazen, Israel is a Jewish state, Tzipi Livni
The Feiglin plan
Moshe Feiglin spoke about his plan for Israel at Chabad Lubavitch in Toronto on May 6 2014.
This event was sponsored by the Jewish Defense League and the Toronto Zionist Council.
Let's go to the videotape.
Labels: Israel is a Jewish state, Moshe Feiglin, one-state solution
Would you tell the British government to stop building in London?
Naftali Bennett blasts calls for a 'building freeze' in Jerusalem and US Secretary of State John FN Kerry's 'poof speech' in an interview on CNN. This is pretty good, not perfect. He correctly identifies the problem, but his solutions aren't strong enough.
Let's go to the videotape.
Labels: Israel is a Jewish state, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, Judea and Samaria, settlement freeze, two-state solution
Of course: Kerry blames Israel for his failure, Psaki tries to walk it back
US Secretary of State John FN Kerry
blamed Israel on Tuesday for his failure at the unrealistically conceived 'peace talks.'
"Israel didn't release the Palestinian prisoners on the day they were
supposed to be freed, and another day passed, and another day, and then
another 700 settlement units
were announced in Jerusalem, and 'poof'...that was sort of the moment,"
remarked Kerry before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Kerry further blamed Israel for demanding recognition as the Jewish
state. Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas brought talks
to a standstill by adamantly refusing to recognize Israel as the Jewish state.
"The government of the United States and the president supports the
notion of Israel being defined as a Jewish state," Kerry noted. "We
believe that that should happen. But when it happens, and how it
happens, has to be part of the negotiations. It's not going to happen in
the beginning."
Noting the intensive energy that he has put into pushing the talks
forward since last July, Kerry noted "there's a limit to the amount of
time that (US) President (Barack) Obama and I can invest in this topic
with consideration to other challenges around the world, especially if
the sides aren't willing to show seriousness."
Nevertheless, Kerry stressed the importance of the peace talks,
saying "if we won't deal with this now, it won't be easier in the future
to achieve a peace agreement. This issue has an influence on our lives
here in the US."
Kerry also admitted that Iran is two months away from having a nuclear weapon.
Iran will be able to develop a nuclear weapon within two months,
acknowledged Kerry, commenting that he was "agnostic" regarding the
outcome of the Vienna talks.
What great accomplishments for the Obama/Kerry administration. /sarc
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki tried to
walk back Kerry's remarks.
In comment to The Jerusalem Post, State Department
spokeswoman Jen Psaki rejected the notion that Kerry's remarks on the
timing of the settlement units placed the onus of the crisis on Israel.
"Secretary
Kerry has been crystal clear that we are not interested in playing the
blame game," Psaki said, "that both sides have taken unhelpful steps and
that it is up to the parties to determine the path forward."
In
his opening remarks to the committee, where he was to discuss the
priorities of the State Department for the year as reflected in its
annual budget, Kerry said that the peace process between Israel and the
Palestinians is an issue "first and foremost among leaders all over the
world."
"Everywhere, it has an impact," he said, including "on life in the United States."
Netanyahu should announce that there will be no more 'talks' while Kerry is Secretary of State. But he won't....
What could go wrong?
Labels: Abu Mazen, Barack Hussein Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel is a Jewish state, Jen Psaki, John Kerry, Middle East peace process
The first Arab riots against Israel's existence were in...
The first Arab riots against Israel's existence did not take place in 1987 or 1967 or even 1937 or 1929. They took place on April 4, 1920, long before there was a state of Israel and longer before Israel 'occupied' Judea and Samaria. They demonstrate that the Arab goal with regard to the State of Israel has always been the same:
The end of Jewish settlement in the biblical land of Israel.
Tens of thousands of Arabs gathered in Jerusalem’s Old City and several
speakers began firing up the horde, including the nefarious Haj Amin
al-Husseini, who would subsequently be appointed the city’s Mufti.
Amid chants of “Palestine is our land and the Jews are our dogs!” the
crowd descended into a violent frenzy and went on the offensive.
Arab assailants proceeded to attack innocent Jewish men, women and
children on the streets, punching, kicking and beating them, as well as
hurling stones and other objects.
They broke into Jewish homes, raped Jewish women, and plundered
property. Cemeteries and yeshivot were also attacked, with tombstones
and Torah scrolls falling victim to the Arab mob’s fury.
Arab policemen, whose task was to maintain order, instead joined in the
fray, while the British Mandatory authorities responded with their
characteristic lethargy and incompetence.
Over 100 Jews were injured in just the first few hours, and the rioting
intensified the following day, leading the British to impose martial
law. Finally, after several more days of unrest, the violence was
finally quelled.
When the dust had settled, a total of five Jews had been killed and
more than 200 wounded, while four Arabs were dead and 25 injured.
Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann along with a senior British military
officer insisted that the British Mandatory authorities had actively
encouraged Arab leaders to incite the violence due to their hostility
towards Zionism.
One month later, in May 1920, the British government dispatched a
commission of inquiry, known as the Palin Commission, to investigate.
In predictable fashion, the final report sought to place blame on both
sides, criticizing the Zionists for “impatience to achieve their
ultimate goal,” as if that would somehow justify an Arab pogrom.
Nonetheless, the commission did note that it was clear that “the
incidence of the attack was against the Jews and… was made in customary
mob fashion with sticks, stones and knives. All the evidence goes to
show that these attacks were of a cowardly and treacherous description,
mostly against old men, women and children, and frequently in the
back.”
Read it all.
Labels: Arabs, Israel is a Jewish state, Palestinian riots, Palestinians
Arab League backs Abu Mazen's refusal to sign an end-of-conflict statement
The Arab League has issued a statement backing the refusal of '
moderate' '
Palestinian' President
Mahmoud Abbas Abu Mazen to
recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
The Arab League announced on Wednesday a full backing of a
Palestinian refusal to meet Israel's demand to be recognized as a Jewish
state, a condition Jerusalem says it required for peace.
"We
express our total rejection of the call to consider Israel as a Jewish
state," read a statement from the final day of the Arab summit in
Kuwait.
...
Palestinians fear the label would lead to discrimination against
Israel's sizable Arab minority, while Israelis say it recognizes Jewish
history and rights on the land.
What's really behind this question is that the 'Palestinians' refuse to say that giving them a
Judenrein (free of Jews) 'Palestinian state' while leaving Israel with over a million 'Israeli Arabs' will not be the end of the conflict. In other words, the 'Palestinians' reject the entire premise of a 'two-state solution' which is that the establishment of a 'Palestinian state' (dividing the land for a second time) will spell the end of the conflict.
Labels: Abu Mazen, Arab League, Israel is a Jewish state, two-state solution
It's not that Obama doesn't get Abu Mazen
What so many people seem not to get - whether because they don't understand it or because they don't want to admit it - is that it's not that Barack Hussein Obama doesn't understand that '
moderate' '
Palestinian' President
Mahmoud Abbas Abu Mazen has no interest in peace. It's that Obama shares Abu Mazen's visceral hatred for Israel. Take for example, Jackson Diehl, who has really come to see Abu Mazen for what he is over
the last five years, but doesn't quite follow through in Sunday's Washington Post.
Obama, as he made clear in the Goldberg interview, perceives Abbas as
the golden key to Mideast peace — “the most politically moderate leader
the Palestinians may ever have,” as Goldberg paraphrased it — and
Netanyahu as the potential spoiler. “I believe that President Abbas is
sincere about his willingness to recognize Israel and its right to
exist,” the president said. “You’ve got a partner on the other side who
is prepared to negotiate seriously . . . for us not to seize this moment I think would be a great mistake.”
But
is Obama right about Abbas? Netanyahu, like most Israelis, doesn’t
think so — and with some reason. The Palestinian president — who was elected to a four-year term in 2005 and has remained in office for five years after its expiration
— turned down President George W. Bush’s request that he sign on to a similar framework in 2008. In 2010, after Obama strong-armed Netanyahu into declaring a moratorium on Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank, Abbas refused to negotiate for nine of the designated 10 months, then broke off the talks after two meetings.
Abbas
agreed to Kerry’s proposal for another nine-month negotiating window
last year in exchange for Israel’s release of more than 100 Palestinian
prisoners, including many convicted of murdering civilians. Abbas hailed them as heroes. Then he embarked on a public campaign to deep-six the two principal provisions Israel has sought in the U.S. framework,
both of which have had Washington’s support. One would allow Israeli
soldiers to remain along the Palestinian-Jordanian border during an
extended transition period; the other would involve Palestinian
recognition that Israel is a Jewish state.
The “Jewish state”
question is hard for many non-Israelis to understand: Who cares what
Arabs call Israel, so long as they accept it? But for Netanyahu and his
followers, the question is essential. Arab leaders have never conceded
that a non-Arab state can hold a permanent place in the Middle East,
they say. Until they do so, there will be no real peace, because
Palestinians will keep pressing to weaken and eventually eliminate
Israel’s Jewish majority.
...
Why does Abbas dare to publicly campaign against the U.S. and Israeli position even before arriving in Washington? Simple: “Abbas believes he can say no to Obama because
the U.S. administration will not take any retaliatory measures against
the Palestinian Authority,” writes the veteran Israeli-Palestinian
journalist Khaled Abu Toameh. Instead, Abbas expects to sit back if the
talks fail, submit petitions to the United Nations and watch the
anti-Israel boycotts mushroom, while paying no price of his own.
The problem is that to Obama,
that's an acceptable outcome. At least it's an acceptable outcome until the 'Palestinians' are God forbid strong enough to extirpate the Jewish state and eliminate all of us. That's something the American media and most American Jews have a hard time admitting. But until the baby is called by its name, nothing will change.
So what happened Monday at the White House? Next post....
Labels: Abu Mazen, Barack Hussein Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel is a Jewish state, Jackson Diehl
Israeli officials slam Kerry's 'Jewish state' statement
On Thursday, US Secretary of State John FN Kerry told a Congressional committee that there is no need for Israel to insist that the 'Palestinians' recognize it as a
Jewish state. On their way into Sunday morning's cabinet meeting, several ministers - not Netanyahu of course - slammed Kerry for taking the easy way out by pressuring only Israel, and not the '
Palestinians.'
Communications minister Gilad Erdan told Israel Radio that it was
unfortunate that the top US diplomat made the comments ahead of
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas's arrival to Washington on
Monday.
Erdan charged that Kerry had erred in marking the statements and said they put pressure on the wrong side.
Meanwhile,
Deputy Foreign Minister Ze'ev Elkin told the radio station that Kerry's
remarks represented a pattern that had developed over the past 20 year,
in which the international community finds it easier to pressure Israel
rather than the Palestinians, despite who it believes is in the right.
Elkin called for Israel to stand up for its principles and bring an end to the "sad tradition."
In an interview that aired Saturday
on Channel 2’s Meet the Press, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon disputed
Kerry’s contention that Israel erred in demanding Palestinian
recognition of its Jewish character.
Ya’alon said that Abbas has
persistently refused to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, and it is
this refusal that makes it impossible to arrive at a final-peace deal.
And Netanyahu (and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman for that matter)? It remains to be seen whether they have the backbone to stand up to Kerry. Because I would not bet on Abu Bluff making any concessions nor would I bet on Kerry or Obama being honest enough to blame the 'Palestinians' when the 'talks' collapse.
Labels: Abu Mazen, Avigdor Lieberman, Barack Hussein Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu, Gilad Erdan, Israel is a Jewish state, John Kerry, Moshe Yaalon, Zeev Elkin
Kerry tells Congress Netanyahu wrong to insist on 'Jewish state' declaration from 'Palestinians'
US Secretary of State John FN Kerry, who still insists he's a friend of Israel, told Congress on Thursday that
Prime Minister Netanyahu is wrong to insist on 'Palestinian' recognition that Israel is a Jewish state.
"I think its a mistake for some people to be raising it again and again
as the critical decider of their attitude toward the possibility of a
state, and peace, and we've obviously made that clear," Kerry told the
House Foreign Relations Committee, in a hearing on budget matters.
Yesterday, Kerry told a Senate panel that Israel and the Palestinians
had less trust in one another than at any point in over nine months of
negotiations.
"'Jewish state' was resolved in 1947 in Resolution 181 where there are
more than 40-- 30 mentions of 'Jewish state,'" Kerry continued. "In
addition, chairman Arafat in 1988 and again in 2004 confirmed that he
agreed it would be a Jewish state. And there are any other number of
mentions."
Netanyahu has said that the PLO's public recognition of Israel as a
Jewish state is a "minimal requirement for peace," and considers the
issue fundamental to the conflict: Arab refusal to accept a permanent
Jewish presence in the region.
Palestinian negotiators say that no other Arab nation that has made peace with Israel has had to declare it the Jewish homeland.
Kerry dampened expectations surrounding a visit by Palestinian Authority
President Mahmoud Abbas to Washington next week, warning that trust
between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators had hit a low point.
The Jewish state may have been mentioned in the 1947 resolution, but the 'Palestinians' didn't recognize it then and don't recognize it now. Arafat said a lot of things between 1993 and 2004, but the bottom line is that he never amended the PLO charter. Does Kerry really want to go there? And as to the difference between the 'Palestinians' and Jordan and Egypt, at the end of the day, we had a border dispute with Jordan and Egypt. The 'Palestinians' are insisting they have rights in our heartland.
But Kerry will do anything - ANYTHING - to get an agreement signed, including, but not limited to, selling Israel and the Jews down the river.
Labels: Abu Mazen, Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel is a Jewish state, John Kerry, Middle East peace process, PLO, two-state solution
Most pro-Israel President evah says no need for PA to recognize Israel as a Jewish state
The self-proclaimed 'most pro-Israel President evah' has decided that the 'Palestinians'
need not recognize Israel as a Jewish state as part of a 'peace agreement.'
The United States believes there is no need for the Palestinian
Authority (PA) to recognize Israel as a Jewish state as part of a peace
agreement, State Department Spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Saturday.
Psaki, who spoke to the PA-based Arabic-language Al-Quds
newspaper, said, “The American position is clear, Israel is a Jewish
state. However, we do not see a need that both sides recognize this
position as part of the final agreement.”
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has been adamant on the PA
recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, explaining that the Arabs’ refusal
to recognize Israel stands at the heart of the conflict.
Is there any more Obama could do to undermine Israel's position?
What could go wrong?
Labels: Abu Mazen, Barack Hussein Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel is a Jewish state, Palestinian state RIGHT NOW syndrome
Abu Mazen says it again, is anyone listening?
'
Moderate' '
Palestinian' President
Mahmoud Abbas Abu Mazen keeps saying it over and over again, and no one listens. He
said it again on Friday in a statement published by the WAFA news agency.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said there is "no way" he will
recognize Israel as a Jewish state and accept a Palestinian capital in
just a portion of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, rebuffing what
Palestinians fear will be key elements of a U.S. peace proposal.
Abbas'
comments signaled that the gaps between him and Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu remain wide after seven months of mediation efforts
by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.
Abbas, whose remarks were
published on Friday by the Palestinian news agency WAFA, said he
withstood international pressure in the past, when he sought U.N.
recognition of a state of Palestine over Washington's objections.
Speaking
to youth activists of his Fatah party, he suggested he would stand firm
again, particularly over the demand that the Palestinians recognize
Israel as a Jewish state.
"They are pressing and saying, 'no peace
without the Jewish state'," he said, though not spelling out who is
applying the pressure. "There is no way. We will not accept."
US Secretary of State John FN Kerry has until April 29 to reach an increasingly unlikely agreement.
What could go wrong?
Labels: Abu Mazen, Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel is a Jewish state, John Kerry, Middle East peace process