Powered by WebAds

Monday, August 24, 2015

It's come to this: IDF 'strategy' paper calls for more use of 'soft power,' ignores Iranian nuke threat

I have to wonder whether the IDF understands that in less than 17 months Barack Hussein Obama will no longer be President of the United States, and that the next President could conceivably disavow his widely unpopular sellout to a nuclear Iran. The IDF published a 'strategy' paper that eschews military solutions, calls for more use of 'soft power,' worries about our relations with the United States (where our problems are not with the American people, but with Hussein Obama and the Left wing of the Democratic party), asserts that we face no existential threats, and ignores the possibility of a nuclear Iran that continues to threaten to destroy us.
The Iranian nuclear threat is not specifically mentioned in the IDF’s new strategy document, at least not in the unclassified version approved for public release.
While its hegemonic Islamic designs on the region and its support for extreme terrorist organizations is a central and recurring point of reference, the existential threat Tehran presumably poses through its nuclear program does not appear in the 33-page document signed by Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot, IDF chief of staff.
Instead, Eisenkot warns against “exposing the state of Israel to risks that are not reasonable for its existence.”
Eisenkot repeatedly references the military’s total subordination to the political echelon and the need to fortify deterrence through a credible military threat. He also writes of the IDF’s obligation to achieve all objectives as defined by the government and to “defend and win” in any government-mandated use of force. But Eisenkot also states that use of military force should be aimed at achieving an improved strategic situation as a result of combat.
At a time of plummeting relations between the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the administration of US President Barack Obama over the Iranian nuclear deal, Israel’s top officer  prioritizes fortifying bilateral cooperation.
Similarly, he defines Israel’s international standing as a key tenet of national security strategy that must be strengthened through multidisciplinary action of which the IDF is only one part.
Israeli experts here welcomed Eisenkot’s publicly released document, yet decried the fact that the Netanyahu government has not come out with a strategy paper at the national level.
As you might imagine from my introduction, I disagree. The Iranian nuclear threat is real and cannot be ignored. We cannot afford to take the risk of going along with the Obama administration's assertions that the agreement will stop a nuclear-armed Iran. It is plain to see that it will not. This report was written for political correctness.
“Even when a conflict develops, as has happened four times over the past decade, the enemies cannot be defeated through exclusively military means, whether due to the minimalist definition of political aim, or as a result of constraints in using force by international law and the lack of international legitimacy for using military force in a civilian environment,” they write.
The INSS authors called for a revised national strategy for promoting Israel’s interests and political-security goals that must include public diplomacy, “instruments of soft power,” cooperation with actors whose interests overlap those of Israel; cyber operations, and the establishment “of a legal and public relations apparatus aimed at reducing Israel’s isolation in the international arena.”
The only time the World sympathizes with Jews is after we've - God Forbid - gone like sheep to the slaughter. This has been proven time and time again throughout Jewish history. We have only the Holy One Blessed Be He on whom we can rely. We cannot rely on the United States or anyone else. Any attempts to do so betray a weakness of spirit and could God Forbid lead to calamity.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 09, 2015

Report: CIA Chief John Brennan makes 'secret' visit to Israel

Haaretz's @BarakRavid reports that CIA director John Brennan made a 'secret' visit to Israel last week as the guest of Mossad chief Tamir Pardo.
Brennan’s visit to Israel last Thursday had been planned long ahead of time. However, it came at a sensitive diplomatic juncture, about a month before the date set for a comprehensive agreement between Iran and the six world powers on Iran’s nuclear program. It is unclear whether Brennan conveyed a message about the agreement to Netanyahu from President Barack Obama.
Israel and the U.S. are deeply divided over the emerging agreement; Netanyahu has said publicly that he opposes it and that he will try to stop it. Obama routinely rejects Netanyahu’s criticism, including in an interview two weeks ago with Channel 2, in which he said that the agreement was the best option to stop Iran from attaining nuclear weapons.
In addition to the agreement with Iran, talks with Brennan dealt with Iranian activities in the region in general. Netanyahu has been warning in recent weeks of deepening Iranian involvement in Iraq, Syria and Yemen, as well as the increasing amount of weapons Tehran is providing to Hezbollah. Netanyahu has also warned of attempted Iranian terror attacks against Israeli targets abroad.
A few days before his secret visit to Israel, Brennan told the CBS program Face the Nation that the diplomatic and political tensions between Obama and Netanyahu are not harming cooperation between the intelligence organizations of the two countries.
And Brennan is not the only guest.
On Monday, a few days after Brennan’s visit, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, landed in Israel. Dempsey, who is the guest of Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, will also meet with Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon. Like Brennan’s visit, Dempsey’s is expected to deal mainly with the Iranian issue. 
There must be real fear in Washington that Israel can somehow stop this deal or blow it up by attacking Iran. Otherwise, you can bet that the Obama administration, which is in the fourth quarter of its existence, would not be going out of its way to placate Israel. Given that the US fears something Israel could do stop this deal, maybe we should stop talking and just do it? 

Labels: , , , , , ,

Google