Powered by WebAds

Sunday, September 02, 2012

Wow! Al-Guardian publishes a defense of the Batsheva dance company

You may recall that in an earlier post, I reported on the disruption of an appearance by the Batsheva Dance Company at the Edinburgh (Scotland) Dance Festival. The most amazing thing about this comment blasting that disruption and others is that it appears in al-Guardian. It's a comment by the granddaughter of the founder of the Edinburgh Dance Festival.
As Batsheva are an ethnically mixed group of performers who danced to a "mash up" including the Star Wars theme and Wagner and who, at home, have incurred the wrath of the Orthodox community for a routine involving them stripping off to a Passover song, it would seem bizarre to hold them responsible for any Israeli government policies. Surely it would make as much sense to blame the ballerinas of the Mariinsky (formerly the Kirov) for Putin's human rights abuses. Indeed, Batsheva's choreographer, Ohad Naharin, has said he is "in disagreement" with his government whereas the prima ballerina of the Mariinsky, Diana Vishneva, has maintained a studied silence over the fate of Pussy Riot.

But while Mariinsky played a sumptuous Cinderella at the Festival theatre to sell out audiences, with a line of chauffeur-driven cars waiting outside to pick up dignitaries, including government ministers, the Batsheva had a very different fate. Their show played to half-empty houses and was continually disrupted inside the theatre. It was a tense and nervous – if well-coiffed in shades of grey – Edinburgh contemporary dance audience that made it into the foyer through the hundreds of shouting demonstrators taking up most of the pavement outside.

The night I was there, the show was stopped three times; the next night it was four. As an audience member, I must confess I felt alarmed and vulnerable. I didn't know what was about to happen. The 82-year-old Dutchman next to me patted my arm and murmured: "This is not Kristallnacht. I remember that"

Despite the courage and professionalism of the performers on stage it must have been a nerve-racking gig for them; in other countries protesters have remained outside the theatre. No one was arrested for any of the disruptions, the Scottish police taking the view that it was not illegal.

The dancers were being held responsible for the situation of Palestinians on the West Bank and in Gaza on the very thin grounds that their work had been praised by the Israeli government and they take government money – both things that apply to the Mariinsky.

A group of Scottish writers headed by Scotland's national poet Liz Lochhead (who has also taken government money on occasion) even wrote to the press calling for a cultural boycott of all Israeli companies and artists. This was what was effectively being imposed on the rest of us by the pickets outside.

I felt personally deeply ashamed and upset that these renowned international artists who were visiting the EIF were unable to perform their show in peace.
It's striking how author Jackie Kemp saw through the double standard that was applied to the Batsheva dancers. I believe that others see it but choose to ignore it.

Read the whole thing. The post is supposed to be open to comments 'Sunday morning' London time. At this writing (Noon London time - this is a 'scheduled' post), it is not yet open to comments. When it does open to comments, you may want to have your screen capture utility ready since many of the comments will be quickly deleted.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, September 08, 2011

British hypocrisy

When I saw this video advertised I thought it would be about the disruption of the Israel Philharmonic at Royal Prince Albert Hall last Thursday night. It's not. This video was actually posted to YouTube the day before the Philharmonic incident, but it could equally have been posted the day after.
When Syrians perform at Edinburgh, England, no one protests about Assad's murder of Syrians and Palestinian refugees, or the persecution of non-Muslims in Syria. But when the famous Jerusalem Quartet performs at Edinburgh, and the audience just wants to listen to some nice Mozart, they are disrupted by a few protestors shouting "Jerusalem is occupied" (guess they don't know history, even if you don't recognize the annexation of East Jerusalem, everyone agrees West Jerusalem is part of Israel), or "Apartheid" (which is a shame to South African Apartheid, since you can't compare the two, and reflects a double standard when not applied to Arab countries, where this is real Apartheid, and not Israel).

That leads us to question - how much do these "human rights activists" care about Arab rights over an orchestra's performance? Or do they care more about demonizing and delegimizing the very existence of a Jewish state and its right to self-defense?

Did the protestors even know that two of the members of the Jerusalem Quartet are also regular performers with Daniel Barenboim's West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, which brings Arab and Israeli musicians together?
Let's go to the videotape.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Google