Israel Matzav

Monday, April 08, 2013

Dr. Denis MacEoin blasts Carter award in letter to Cardozo alumni

I trust that many of my readers will remember Dr. Denis MacEoin. In an open letter to alumni of Yeshiva University's Cardozo law school (received by email), Dr. MacEoin has blasted the school's choice to give an award to Jimmy Carter.

Dear Cardozo Alumni,

I am writing as someone concerned by the news that a journal of the Cardozo Law School is about to honour former president Jimmy Carter. I am not a lawyer (though I do have some expertise in Islamic law), but I have been an academic (in Persian, Arabic and Islamic Studies) and I have for a great many years been a vocal supporter of the state of Israel, a defender of most of its policies, and a strict opponent of the fictions and lies that follow Israel and Israelis everywhere. As you will know, and as every student at Yeshiva University must know, the most common charge against Israel is that it is an ‘apartheid state’. I have written about this at some length in a recently published book, written in reply to an anti-Israel activist who makes precisely that accusation.

Many of those who call for the end of Israel, most notably the international Boycott Divestment Sanctions movement, use the apartheid trope as justification for their egregious behaviour. Knowing, as I do, that the charge is completely without foundation and that there is not a trace of apartheid in Israel, I work to dispel the illusion that Israel is somehow like South Africa. As lawyers, you no doubt understand the differences between apartheid South African legislation and Israeli laws.

Someone who has done a lot to convince the general public that Israel deserves the apartheid slur is former USA president Jimmy Carter, who in 2007 published a book entitled Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. Carter does not say that Israel as such is an apartheid state, but argues that Israel imposes apartheid on Palestinians living in the West Bank. His book is replete with errors, is sloppy in argument, and is indefensible in terms of his understanding the legal arguments he dabbles in. He has never agreed to debate its arguments with anyone, including recognized experts on this subject. It is a book of poor quality, however sincere Carter’s motives may have been in writing it. CAMERA, Abraham Foxman and others have shown Carter’s book to be devoid of fact or rational argument, yet it remains a vital part of virulently anti-Semitic attacks on Israel and its citizens.

It seems indefensible to me that a law school journal of Yeshiva University (or any university, come to that) would want to honour someone who has wrought so much harm for Jews and Israelis, including Arab Israelis. No doubt the former president has done many things that deserve honour in his quest for peace and justice. But his outright defamation of a democratic and law-based state does not sit well with his other achievements, and certainly does not accord with the values of the Cardozo Law School, as I understand them, from the school’s Innocence Project to action taken on behalf of Holocaust victims. The accusation of apartheid against a country that is determinedly opposed to segregation and legalized discrimination is an inversion of justice. To honour a man in part responsible for the mainstreaming of that atrocious libel can only besmirch the name of an eminent school, cast shame on faculty and alumni alike, and endorse the use of falsehood in the political arena worldwide.

I call on you all to email Dean Diller and President Joel in an attempt to persuade the administration to cancel Carter’s visit. Perhaps Cardozo can honour someone else, someone like the Nobel Prize nominee, Malala Youssafzai, whose courage and determination stand heads above a man so consumed by hatred that he dishonours the values of honesty and sincerity he first brought to the presidency all those years ago.

Best wishes to you all,

Dr. Denis MacEoin

Indeed.

Labels: Denis MacEoin, Israeli apartheid, Jimmy Carter, Yeshiva University

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

Professor MacEoin following vote in Edinburgh University calling Israel an apartheid country

I received this via email:

Dear All,

Please find below the courageous and intelligent statement from Professor Denis M. MacEoin (b. Belfast, Northern Ireland, 1949) following a vote by students in Edinburgh University calling Israel an apartheid country.

Denis M. MacEoin is a novelist and a former lecturer in Islamic studies. His novels are written under the pen names Daniel Easterman and Jonathan Aycliffe. He continues to work on Islamic issues, particularly the development of radical Islam. He has written three reports for British think tanks, dealing with Islamic issues. The first was The Hijacking of British Islam, written for Policy Exchange. It is a study of hate literature found in British mosques and other institutions. He later wrote a report on British Muslim schools, published online by Civitas, entitled Music, Chess and other Sins. In 2009, Civitas also published in hard copy Shari'a Law or One Law for All.

… There has never been a system of apartheid in Israel. This is a fact that can be tested against reality by any Edinburgh student, should he or she choose to visit Israel to see for themselves.

… I have the impression that those members of EUSA (Edinburgh University Student Association) who voted for this motion are absolutely clueless in matters concerning Israel, and are, in all likelihood, the victims of extremely biased propaganda coming from the anti-Israel lobby. Being anti-Israel is not in itself objectionable. But I’m … speaking of a hatred that permits itself no boundaries in the lies and myths it pours out. Thus, Israel is repeatedly referred to as a “Nazi” state. In what sense is this true, even as a metaphor? Where are the Israeli concentration camps? The einzatsgruppen? The SS? The Nuremberg Laws? The Final Solution? None of these things nor anything remotely resembling them exists in Israel, precisely because the Jews, more than anyone on earth, understand what Nazism stood for. It is claimed that there has been an Israeli Holocaust in Gaza (and elsewhere). Where? When? No honest historian would treat that claim with anything but the contempt it deserves. But calling Jews Nazis and saying they have committed a Holocaust is as basic a way to subvert historical fact as anything I can think of.

Likewise Apartheid. For Apartheid to exist, there would have to be a situation that closely resembled things in South Africa under the Apartheid regime. … A weekend in any part of Israel would be enough to show how ridiculous the claim is. That a body of university students actually fell for this and voted on it is a sad comment on the state of modern education. The most obvious focus for apartheid would be Israel’s 20% Arab population. Under Israeli law, Arab Israelis have exactly the same rights as Jews or anyone else; Muslims have the same rights as Jews or Christians; Baha’is, severely persecuted in Iran, flourish in Israel, where they have their world centre; Ahmadi Muslims, severely persecuted in Pakistan and elsewhere, are kept safe by Israel; the holy places of all religions are protected under a specific Israeli law. Arabs form 20% of the university population (an exact echo of their percentage in the general population). In Iran, the Baha’is (the largest religious minority) are forbidden to study in any university or to run their own universities: why aren’t your members boycotting Iran?

Arabs in Israel can go anywhere they want, unlike blacks in apartheid South Africa. They use public transport, they eat in restaurants, they go to swimming pools, they use libraries, they go to cinemas alongside Jews – something no black could do in South Africa. Israeli hospitals, not only treat Jews and Arabs, they also treat Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank. On the same wards, in the same operating theaters.

In Israel, women have the same rights as men: there is no gender apartheid. Gay men and women face no restrictions, and Palestinian gays often escape into Israel, because they may be killed at home. It seems bizarre to me that LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) groups call for a boycott of Israel and say nothing about countries like Iran, where gay men are hanged or stoned to death. That illustrates a mindset that beggars belief. Intelligent students thinking it’s better to be silent about regimes that kill gay people, but good to condemn the only country in the Middle East that rescues and protects gay people. Is that supposed to be a sick joke?

University is supposed to be about learning to use your brain, to think rationally, to examine evidence, to reach conclusions based on solid evidence, to compare sources, to weigh up one view against one or more others. If the best Edinburgh can now produce are students who have no idea how to do any of these things, then the future is bleak. I do not object to well documented criticism of Israel. I do object when supposedly intelligent people single out the Jewish state above states that are horrific in their treatment of their own populations. We are going through the biggest upheaval in the Middle East since the 7th and 8th centuries, and it’s clear that Arabs and Iranians are rebelling against terrifying regimes that fight back by killing their own citizens. Israeli citizens – Jews and Arabs alike – do not rebel (though they are free to protest).

Yet Edinburgh students mount no demonstrations and call for no boycotts against Libya, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Iran. They prefer to make false accusations against one of the world’s freest countries, the only country in the Middle East that has taken in Darfur refugees, the only country in the Middle East that gives refuge to gay men and women, the only country in the Middle East that protects the Baha’is. The imbalance is perceptible and it sheds no credit on anyone who voted for this boycott.

I ask you to show some common sense. Get information from the Israeli embassy. Ask for some speakers. Listen to more than one side. Do not make your minds up until you have given a fair hearing to both parties. You have a duty to your students, and that is to protect them from one-sided argument. They are not at university to be propagandised. And they are certainly not there to be tricked into anti-Semitism by punishing one country among all the countries of the world, which happens to be the only Jewish state.

Your generation has a duty to ensure that the perennial racism of anti-Semitism never sets down roots among you. Today, however, there are clear signs that it has done so and is putting down more. You have a chance to avert a very great evil, simply by using reason and a sense of fair play.”