The image comes from here. Embedding it (which is what the site wants you to) would have rogered my entire page, so I screen captured and am giving credit.
Last July, when a Hamas rocket randomly landed five kilometers from Ben Gurion Airport, it took President Obama's Federal Aviation Administration about three hours to ban all US flights to Israel, including several that were turned back.
When I was in the US last week, there was a lot of talk on the radio about President Obama's sending 3,000 US troops to Africa to 'fight' the Ebola virus. Those troops will have their 'boots on the ground' and many may well return to the US with the disease. On the other hand, Obama will not put any boots on the ground to fight Islamic State, which most Americans (including Democrats from what I saw and heard) consider a much greater threat.
Since then, the Obama administration has been asked about stopping
flights into West African countries where Ebola is a problem. Their position is to keep the flights going. But don’t worry. We are taking people’s temperature before they board the flights.
Compare this to the Obama administration banning flights to Israel back in July.
It turned out to be a political stunt quickly cancelled after Senator
Ted Cruz threatened to block State Department appointments unless
questions were answered. The administration claimed that rockets fired
by Hamas put flights in jeopardy despite none of the rockets coming
close to the airport.
Now, however, we have a person in the United States who flew back
from Africa with Ebola. The White House neither wants to stop flights
to Africa nor does it want to more closely monitor people coming into
the United States from Africa via other countries.
At least this administration is consistent. It will let every one
and every thing, including pestilence, cross our border. I bet, if we
are patient, the administration will even place Ebola with a nice family
somewhere in Middle America and given it government benefits.
Not only did this person enter the United States, he exposed five kids in four different Dallas-area public schools to the virus. Now, a second person may have it as well. Radio talk show host Michael Savage (who has quoted from this blog in the past) has slammed President 'Obola' for his mishandling of the crisis.
Savage who has a doctorate in
epidemiology, said Obama refused to employ the basic epidemiological
rule of quarantining a deadly virus, “because the far-left agenda is to
have an open-borders policy.”
Referring to the commander in chief as “President Obola,” Savage said
on his nationally syndicated show Wednesday the “only solution is zero
travel in and out of West Africa for any American.”
“You let nobody in from a country where you have a raging epidemic,” he said, emphasizing “microbes do not discriminate.”
“You isolate and you quarantine an entire nation, if necessary.”
Savage addressed the argument that it’s not practical to isolate an entire country or region.
“Is it practical to risk the spread of a killer illness?” he countered.
On Saturday, a prominent rabbi in our neighborhood mentioned the Ebola virus as part of his special talk for the penitential season. He said that Ebola is spreading partly because there simply are no medical facilities in Africa (in Liberia a large percentage of the medical professionals has been infected with the virus and died) and partly because families refuse to disclose when family members are infected. They cover it up.
Greta Van Susteren: Obama WH Called Me to Push Reporter to Not Cover Benghazi
Greta Van Susteren admitted Friday on Off the Record that she was called by
the Obama White House and told to push a FOX reporter to not cover
Benghazi.
Chelsea
Clinton will be 34 years old on the 27th and is looking forward to a
life of politics. Start her out properly as US Ambassador to Libya and
put her on our American compound in Benghazi. After all, what difference
does it make!
Will anyone notice that the NY Times proved Obama wrong?
A New York Times story last weekend, which tried to revive the 'anti-Muslim film' theory for last fall's attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, unintentionally proves that President Obama's focus on the 'Zawhiri faction of al-Qaeda' as the sole source of terrorism in the world is far off base. This is from Caroline Glick.
Kirkpatrick’s claim that al-Qaida played no role in the attack was refuted by the Times’
own reporting six weeks after the attack. It has also been refuted by
congressional and State Department investigations, by the UN and by a
raft of other reporting.
His claim that the YouTube video did spur some of the attackers to
action was categorically rejected last spring in sworn congressional
testimony by then-deputy chief of the US mission to Libya Gregory Hicks.
Last May Hicks stated, “The YouTube video was a non-event in Libya.
The video was not instigative of anything that was going on in Libya. We
saw no demonstrators related to the video anywhere in Libya.”
Kirkpatrick’s larger message – that the reasoning behind Obama’s
entire counterterrorist strategy and his overall Middle East policy is
totally wrong, and deeply destructive – has been missed because his
article was written and published to whitewash the administration’s
deliberate mischaracterization of the events in Benghazi, not to
discredit the rationale behind its Middle East policy and
counterterrorism strategy. This is why he claimed that al-Qaida wasn’t
involved in the attack. And this is why he claimed that the YouTube
video was a cause for the attack.
This much was made clear in a blog post by editorial page editor
Andrew Rosenthal, who alleged that the entire discourse on Benghazi is
promoted by the Republicans to harm the Democrats, and Kirkpatrick’s
story served to weaken the Republican arguments. In Rosenthal’s words,
“The Republicans hope to tarnish Democratic candidates by making it seem
as though Mr. Obama doesn’t take al-Qaida seriously.”
So pathetically, in a bid to defend Obama and Clinton and the rest of the Democrats, the Times
published a report that showed that Obama’s laser-like focus on the
Zawahiri-controlled faction of al-Qaida has endangered the US.
By failing to view as enemies any other terror groups – even if they
have participated in attacks against the US – and indeed, in perceiving
them as potential allies, Obama has failed to defend against them.
Indeed, by wooing them as future allies, Obama has empowered forces as
committed as al-Qaida to defeating the US.
New York Times presents Obama lies on Benghazi as 'news'
The New York Times has published a 'report' that claims that the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was the result of an anti-Islam video that was posted on the internet.
How non-credible is this report?
Let's go to the videotape (Hat Tip: David K).
You don't think that the Obama administration ordered this report, do you?
Consider this: The Democratic National Committee sent out emails on Saturday night, urging recipients to support Democrats in next fall's Congressional elections to keep the Republicans from impeaching President Obama (Hat Tip: Jack W).
The email, subject line “Impeachment,” was sent to Obama for America
supporters, imploring them to contribute to the DNC’s 2014 efforts.
“What do these people all have in common?,” the email asked, featuring
quotes from Republican Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, Rep. Michele
Bachmann of Minnesota, Rep. Kerry Bentivolio of Michigan, and Rep. Blake
Farenthold of Texas discussing the possibility of impeaching Obama for
one of his numerous instances of presidential misconduct.
The DNC email discussed the “I-Word” and said that “Republicans are actually excited about the idea.”
“Show these Republicans that they are way, way off-base, and give
President Obama a Congress that has his back,” according to the DNC
email, noting that Democrats need to win 17 GOP House seats to reclaim a
majority.
The DNC, which recently expanded its political tactics to include boycotting independent news outlets, previously supported the last president to be impeached: Bill Clinton.
Obama’s staff changed key talking points on the 2012 Benghazi
terrorist attack; his Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative
groups during the 2012 election cycle; and Obama personally lied to the
American people when he told them that they could keep their existing
doctors and health insurance plans under Obamacare.
Obama’s expansion of executive branch authority is “setting the stage for something very dangerous in the future” according to Republican Rep. Justin Amash.
Not to mention that Obama is promoting the very dangerous agreement which will lead to a nuclear Iran, and are trying to pummel the United States' sole reliable ally in the Middle East into endangering its security....
US National Security Adviser Lazy Susan Rice piled onto US Secretary of State John FN Kerry's attack on Israeli 'settlements' on Thursday, reiterating that the United StatesObama administration considers them 'illegitimate.'
Echoing Palestinian complaints, National
Security Adviser and former US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice’s remarks
to a Washington think tank came a day after lead Palestinian negotiator
Saeb Erekat resigned for what he said was a lack of Israeli integrity, as ostensibly demonstrated by continued building activity in the West Bank.
“We have seen increased tensions on the
ground. Some of this is a result of recent settlement announcements. So
let me reiterate: The United States does not accept the legitimacy of
continued Israeli settlement activity,” Rice told the Middle East
Institute, echoing similar comments made by US Secretary of State John Kerry last week.
Calling Israeli 'settlements' 'illegitimate' isn't the first lie Lazy Susan told. Here are four videos of Lazy Susan lying about what happened in Benghazi 14 months ago.
Let's go to the videotapes (Hat Tip for all videos: Mike P).
Spontaneous? Hijacked? Substantial security presence? You mean the one that wasn't allowed near the consulate? Direct result of 'heinous and offensive video'? Really? Not anti-American? Outpouring of sympathy for Ambassador Stevens? As they were dragging him through the streets?
Let's go to the videotape.
There's the 'hateful video' again - the one that Rice knew was a lie by then.
Let's go to the videotape.
There's the 'spontaneous reaction to a video' story again, long after she knew that it was a lie. President ordered additional reinforcements to Tripoli? There's another lie.
And here's the 'spontaneous reaction to a video' lie again. Let's go to the videotape.
Is anyone aware of Rice ever having an independent thought? How did she ever write a PhD thesis?
Gregory Hicks 'This Week' Exclusive Interview on Benghazi Consulate Attacks
Wednesday marks the anniversary of the terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi. Gregory Hicks is the only senior US diplomat who has been willing to talk about it.
Let's go to the videotape.
President Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, an apparent candidate for President in 2016, have a mutual interest in continuing to cover up this scandal. Shame on both of them.
Ambassador Chris Stevens was murdered by the Muslim Brotherhood, killer is in Egypt
This is incredible. The US knows - and apparently has known for a long time - that its Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens was murdered by the Muslim Brotherhood last September.
Let's go to the videotape (video in Arabic - English summary follows).
Moussa said, addressing U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson (in absentia) on his show:
Ambassador Stevens was killed in
Benghazi, and you know who killed him, the U.S. administration knows who
killed him, and you know how he was killed and it was a major strike
against the U.S. administration, and all of you.
The assassin is now present at Rabia
Al-Adawiya [mosque protest] His name is, do you know it or you would
like me to inform you? He’s affiliated with Al Qaeda in Libya, his name
is Mohsen Al-Azazi, his passport was found in the house of Khairat
El-Shater.
That killer is in Rabia Al-Adawiya
now, with Safwat Hegazy and Mohammed El-Beltagy, whom you and your
administration support and aid. Your administration aids terrorism.
In the course of this statement, Moussa announced three facts:
1. Ambassador Chris Stevens' assassin in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, is named Mohsen Al-Azazi
2. Azizi associates with Mohammed El-Beltagy, the general secretary
of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) and with
Safwat Hegazy, a leading MB cleric.
3. The police found Azizi’s passport in the house of leading MB
strategist Khairat El-Shater, presumbably when Shater was arrested on
July 5.
Read the whole thing. This explains a lot about why the Obama administration wants Mohammed Morsy restored to power. If the Egyptian army prevails, there's a lot more Benghazigate dirt that's likely to come out that won't help Obama or Hillary Clinton.
We can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all the other possibilities
The quote in the title of this post is a quip of Winston Churchill's, and honestly I don't think it's true in this administration. Obama won't do the right thing until it's too late, if at all. Here's Caroline Glick.
The US and Europe are not taken in by Iran because Iran is good at hiding its true intentions.
They
are taken in by Iran because they want to be taken in. They want to
believe that they don’t have to attack Iran and overthrow the regime to
prevent it from becoming a nuclear power. They want to believe they can
appease Iran by pretending it isn’t a danger, just as they believe they
can end the threat of terror by jihadists in the US military and
Benghazi by pretending they don’t exist.
They want to believe
these threats can be ignored, or appeased away. And just as Obama and
his followers are willing to pretend away Hasan’s actions to protect
“diversity,” and to pretend away the September 11, 2012, attack in
Benghazi to protect the myth of the Arab Spring, so they are willing to
permit Iran to go nuclear to protect the sanctity of appeasement.
The
only thing they are willing to put their foot down about is the
prospect of an Israeli strike. And they have put their foot down on this
issue for the past decade. It isn’t that the US is deliberately
enabling Iran to acquire a nuclear arsenal. It is just that the US elite
in government and the media care more about protecting their faith in
diversity and appeasement than they do about preventing Iran from
becoming a nuclear power.
They have convinced themselves that the
prospect of appeasing Iran will evaporate if Israel attacks Iran’s
nuclear installations. And so we have seen a parade of senior US defense
officials descending on Israel every time it appears that Israel is
planning to attack Iran. We have seen a parade of former Israeli
military and security chiefs with close ties to the US defense
establishment declaring before every available microphone that Israel
must not strike Iran and that we can count on Obama to protect us.
But
we mustn’t believe their assurances or succumb to their pressure. Obama
will not change course. He doesn’t have to. So long as he maintains
faith with the god of appeasement, the US media will protect him. And so
long as they protect him, he will pay no price for his failures. So he
will repeat them.
OMG: Most transparent administration evah forced Benghazi survivors to sign non-disclosure agreements
How's this for transparency? The most transparent administration evah forced survivors of the terror attack at the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya last September to sign non-disclosure agreements. And you can bet that they told people that was necessary due to 'national security.'
Nixon and Obama: Like brothers from another mother
Many pundits and journalists, including CBS' Bob Schieffer, have drawn
parallels between the Obama White House's handling of scandals plaguing
the administration and Former President Nixon's management of Watergate.
We looked back in the archives to see just how close they were.
Here's a great web ad put out on Friday by American Crossroads about the Obama administration's coverup of the Islamic terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya last September.
The picture above is very true, but as far as I am concerned, they will still have totally gotten away with it if Hillary is the Democratic nominee in 2016.
I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com