Israel Matzav: #CHANGE Moderate Arab states ignore Obama-Kerry initiative

Sunday, January 01, 2017

#CHANGE Moderate Arab states ignore Obama-Kerry initiative

If the moderate Arab states were supposed to latch onto Secretary of State Kerry's 'peace proposal' and use it, along with United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 to pressure Israel, someone forgot to tell them that. Or, as is more likely, they have read the handwriting on the walls, and have realized that they will have to work with Donald Trump for the next 4-8 years.

But the official responses in Cairo, Riyadh and Amman seemed calculated to make an impression on the incoming Trump administration rather than to impel any immediate or urgent follow up on the Kerry proposals. That was not expected, given that Kerry and President Barack Obama have only three weeks left in office and Donald Trump has signaled there will be a friendlier approach towards the policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

"Now, with the imminent change in the White House, Kerry's noble views may very well remain a small footnote in the history books," the Jordan Times wrote in an editorial Thursday.

Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia are, to some extent, groping in the dark, uncertain about what Trump policies that will strongly impact their futures will look like. By giving essentially positive responses to Kerry's proposals, "they are trying to show they are pro-peace, useful and very relevant as mediators and mainstays of the process and trying also to anticipate what the new administration in Washington wishes to do," said Gabriel Ben-Dor, a Middle East specialist at Haifa University. The countries also have their sights set on being relevant in advance of the January 15 conference bringing together some 70 foreign ministers in Paris whose goal is to reaffirm the necessity of a two-state solution.

...

As Tel Aviv University Middle East scholar Bruce Maddy-Weitzman has noted, close scrutiny of Cairo and Riyadh's reactions to Kerry indicate that neither Arab country has the sense of urgency that Kerry conveyed in his speech. Egypt's Foreign Ministry said that Kerry's principles were "mostly consistent with the international consensus and Egypt's vision but in the end what is important is the will to implement those principles eventually."

Saudi Arabia welcomed the proposals, according to an official at the Saudi foreign ministry, who said Riyadh views them as being in accord with the majority of the resolutions of international legality. Riyadh said that Kerry's proposals have elements of the Arab Peace Initiative proposed by Saudi Arabia and adopted by an Arab summit at Beirut in 2002. It added that the proposals represent an "appropriate basis" for achieving a final settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

But, Maddy-Weitzman noted "there is no operative clause in the Saudi response to move forward fast and do this or that."

"This suggests the Saudis understand there won't be significant movement any time soon as a result of the speech," he said. "They recognize there is a new administration coming in that is expressing itself differently on Middle East issues. Saudi strategic priorities are elsewhere. There are more acute issues occupying their thinking. The Palestinian-Israeli issue is lower down. That doesn't mean they don't care and would go along with anything the Israeli government would do."

"At this point, the Saudis won't take the lead on Palestinian-Israeli diplomacy unless the Trump administration takes the initiative or something forces them to, like a new intifada." But Riyadh will try to persuade the US not to move its Israel embassy to Jerusalem, Maddy-Weitzman predicted.

In its reaction to Kerry, Egypt was mindful of Trump's intervention a week earlier against its sponsorship of the security council resolution specifying that settlements have "no legal validity." Egypt withdrew its sponsorship in deference to Trump and it formulated its response to Kerry with Trump in mind, not wanting to appear to be confrontational towards Israel.

Cairo, which viewed the Obama administration as selling out Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak during the Arab spring revolt in 2011 and of subsequently backing the Muslim Brotherhood, has high hopes for closer ties with Trump. Egypt is relieved to have an administration coming in that will not make an issue out of its human rights abuses in crushing the brotherhood and other opposition. "The leaders of this 'terrorist' organization and those regional and Arab powers that lend them support should realize that the election of Donald Trump will usher in new directions for US foreign policy, which will discontinue the 'interventionist' policies of the two previous US administrations," wrote Hussein Haridy, a former foreign ministry official, in al-Ahram weekly. "If this happens, there will be much more effective cooperation between the American and Egyptian governments in dealing constructively and successfully with existing challenges and threats across the Middle East."

I haven't felt this optimistic since 2008, despite Obama-Kerry's attempts to incinerate Israel over the past two weeks. They're called 'lame ducks' for a reason.

Labels: Barack Hussein Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Egypt, John Kerry, Jordan, Middle East peace process, our friends the Saudis, Saudi Arabia, United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334