Powered by WebAds

Friday, June 13, 2014

House warns Obama on Iran sanctions

The US House of Representatives has warned President Hussein Obama that if it doesn't like whatever deal Obama reaches with Iran on its nuclear capabilities, it will not lift the sanctions against the Islamist state.
The leading Democrat and Republican of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) and ranking member Eliot Engel (D-NY), wrote the letter intended to remind the White House of Congress' role in any future nuclear pact forged with Iran: specifically, the legislature's role in easing, lifting or repealing sanctions levied against the Islamic Republic.
Attained exclusively by The Jerusalem Post, the letter outlines what Engel has referred to in the past as the "minimum requirements for a good deal," noting that any deal "demands congressional approval."
"The concept of an exclusively defined 'nuclear-related' sanction on Iran does not exist in US law," the letter reads. "Almost all sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear program are also related to Tehran’s advancing ballistic missile program, intensifying support for international terrorism, and other unconventional weapons programs."
An interim deal reached in November with Iran, temporarily freezing the international impasse, requires the Congress to refrain from passing any new "nuclear-related sanctions" as world powers attempt to negotiate a comprehensive solution to the crisis.
"Iran's permanent and verifiable termination of all of these activities— not just some— is a prerequisite for permanently lifting most congressionally-mandated sanctions," the letter continues.
...
The letter notes that, in recent testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, US Secretary of State John Kerry has acknowledged any deal with sanctions relief would require Congress' consent "by law."
The lawmakers "urge greater consultation with Congress on a potential sanctions relief package," it reads.
Responding to the Post, administration officials contend that sanctions are, indeed, adequately demarcated based on human rights abuses, sponsorship of terrorism, drug trafficking and proliferation of unconventional weapons by the Treasury Department.
I'm all in favor of seeing Congress hold Obama's feet to the fire, but this threat is kind of empty. Enforcement is entirely a power of the executive branch. Congress can pass all the sanctions they want, but if Obama doesn't enforce them, the only sanction they have is impeachment. It's now June of 2014. When will that bad deal be reached? How long will it take for Congress to say 'keep enforcing the sanctions'? How long will it take for the House to draft and pass articles of impeachment for Obama's failure to enforce the sanctions? How much time will a Senate trial take?

See what I mean - the threat is empty. Obama isn't going to accomplish anything in his last two years in office anyway - particularly if the Republicans win control of both Houses of Congress in November.

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

At 3:39 PM, Blogger Sunlight said...

It seems obvious that Obama's executive branch will be "just following orders" for the duration. And as long as the Israel Start Up Nation, in conjunction with the Federation, etc., continues to lobby for and ingest the Obama/Clinton/KhmerRouge Kerry $$BBillions of fraud Gaia Green $lu$h and the Google $lu$h, Americans will continue to adore Israel, but the b*tching and moaning about the Obama, Clinton, Kerry, etc. Posse does not hold water. Israel's neutrality for the 2012 election (rather than Gaia Pageantry from the Progressive Left) could have helped avert the couch sit-down of voters that were needed to overwhelm the Soros Secy of State Project voter roll rot. I'd like to hear Israeli scientists make observed-data based statements about fossil fuels. Even the founder of Greenpeace has made counter-gaia statements about the data.

What will President Rivlin's view be on this topic? Will he be willing to allow a Skype briefing on it?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google