Last week, US Secretary of State John FN Kerry claimed that Israelis are
too prosperous to make peace with the 'Palestinians.' Now, former New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief Ethan Bronner, who is now safely back in the States after taking flack for his son joining the IDF, is saying
essentially the same thing.
Indeed, Israel has never been richer, safer, more culturally productive
or more dynamic. Terrorism is on the wane. Yet the occupation grinds on
next door with little attention to its consequences. Moreover, as the
power balance has shifted from the European elite, Israel has never felt
more Middle Eastern in its popular culture, music and public displays
of religion. Yet it is increasingly cut off from its region, which
despises it perhaps more than ever. Finally, while the secular
bourgeoisie, represented by Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid Party, has forged an
unexpected alliance with West Bank settlers, represented by Naftali
Bennett’s Habayit Hayehudi Party, aimed at reducing the political power
of the ultra-Orthodox, alarm over the failure to address the Palestinian
problem has grown in a surprising place — among some of the former
princes of the Zionist right wing.
At a Jerusalem cafe one noon, Dan Meridor, the former Likud minister and
son of right-wing Zionist aristocracy, could not stop talking about the
Palestinians.
“It is a sword of Damocles hanging over our heads,” he said. “We are
living on illusions. We must do everything we can on the ground to
increase the separation between us and the Palestinians so that the idea
of one state will go away. But we are doing nothing.”
Mr. Meridor, nursing an American coffee at the cafe near the house his
parents bought many decades ago in the upscale Rehavia neighborhood,
sounded like two other public figures from famous right-wing families —
Ehud Olmert, the former prime minister, and Tzipi Livni,
the justice minister and chief peace negotiator. Both have made a
series of emotional speeches begging Israelis to take the Palestinian
issue seriously. They are getting little traction.
The Israeli left is still there, of course, but in increasingly
insignificant knots. Two Israeli friends in Jaffa, from which tens of
thousands of Palestinians left or were driven out in 1948, have
beautifully renovated a house, even preserving a pre-state lemon tree in
the courtyard. They are friendly with the Arabs who live nearby. Their
children refused military service in protest over the West Bank
occupation. And on the outside of their house they have put up a plaque
noting that until 1948 the structure was the home of the Khader family, a
tiny homage to a destroyed world.
But the family is rare. Mr. Lapid, the rising star of Israeli politics,
is a former television host who agrees that something must be done about
the Palestinians. But in an interview he offers no specifics other than
hoping Mr. Kerry will pressure them to return to the negotiating table
under conditions they have long rejected. Mr. Lapid, who spoke in the
outdoor section of his neighborhood cafe in north Tel Aviv on a fragrant
spring afternoon, was relaxed and buff in his long-sleeved black
T-shirt and black jeans. Well-off Tel Avivians at nearby tables argued
into their iPhones. Mr. Lapid said Israel should not change its
settlement policy to lure the Palestinians to negotiations, nor should
any part of Jerusalem become the capital of the Palestinian state he
says he longs for. He has not reached out to any Palestinian politicians
nor spoken publicly on the issue. As finance minister, he is focused on
closing the government’s deficit.
Mr. Lapid may be a political novice but he knows the public mood. A former senior aide to Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
agreed, over a Jerusalem lunch of toasted bagels and salad, that most
Israelis considered the peace process irrelevant because they believed
that the Palestinians had no interest in a deal, especially in the
current Middle Eastern context of rising Islamism. “Debating the peace
process to most Israelis is the equivalent of debating the color of the
shirt you will wear when landing on Mars,” he said.
I guess they'd rather we be rolling in the streets in agony over the 'Palestinians' refusal to talk to us. We're not. Any 'negotiation' is going to consist of Israel giving and giving and giving, and the 'Palestinians' taking and taking and taking. We have nothing to gain and everything to lose. Why should we pursue the 'Palestinians' when they want us to give away the whole store in advance?
No comments:
Post a Comment