In President Obama's next election, he favors ABBB (Anyone But BiBi). Evelyn Gordon points out a small problem: From Obama's perspective
Netanyahu's main rival (Shelly Yacimovich) isn't much of an improvement.
So here, according to Israeli embassy reports
on her meetings with French officials in July, is what she thinks on
diplomatic issues: She thinks the Palestinians should negotiate without
preconditions – just like Netanyahu. She thinks they must recognize
Israel as a Jewish state – again like Netanyahu. She thinks Israel
should retain the major settlement blocs, and shouldn’t withdraw to the
1967 lines – yet again like Netanyahu.
And, from an interview
last year: While she thinks most settlements will have to go under any
deal with the Palestinians, she, like Netanyahu, doesn’t consider them
“a sin and a crime.”
Moreover, again like Netanyahu, she doesn’t think
the “peace process” should top Israel’s agenda (though she disagrees
with him over what should). In fact, as she herself said
just last week, she is “fighting for” the cause of “ending the
dichotomy between left and right in foreign affairs. There are no longer
two blocs … it’s all a fixation.”
In short, contrary to the media’s persistent portrayal of Netanyahu
as a “hardline right-winger” heading a “far right” coalition, his
positions on the Palestinian issue are shared by almost all Israelis –
not only supporters of his coalition, but also supporters of what is
likely to be the main opposition party come January, assuming Netanyahu
(as expected) forms the next government. What will probably keep
Yacimovich out of his coalition aren’t her diplomatic views, but his
economic ones.
Hence if Obama is hoping for an Israeli leader whose positions on the
“peace process” will be closer to his own than Netanyahu’s, he should
think again: There isn’t one.
Heh.
No comments:
Post a Comment