US military chief Martin Dempsey to Israel: 'We won't have your back if you attack Iran'
Speaking to journalists in London at the opening of the Paralympic games, Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the United States would not have Israel's back if it unilaterally attacked Iran. Distancing himself from any Israeli plan to bomb Iran, Dempsey said such an attack would "clearly delay but probably not destroy Iran's nuclear programme".The sanctions are indeed having an effect on Iran, but it's not the one that the United States Congress intended. In the meantime, Dempsey's not wanting to be complicit indicates that the US will stand aside if there's an Israeli attack. I wonder whether that includes absorbing the inevitable Iranian attacks on US troops.
He added: "I don't want to be complicit if they [Israel] choose to do it."
Dempsey said he did not know Iran's nuclear intentions, as intelligence did not reveal intentions. What was clear, he said, was that the "international coalition" applying pressure on Iran "could be undone if [Iran] was attacked prematurely". Sanctions against Iran were having an effect, and they should be given a reasonable opportunity to succeed.
Here's the problem: Most of Israel is convinced that President Obama is more concerned with his own reelection than he is with this country's fate. So long as that is the case, he will not be able to stop Israel from taking unilateral action.
Labels: Iranian nuclear threat, Israeli attack on Iran, Martin Dempsey
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 1:33 AM
1 Comments:
This Obama approach has a second half to the equation... I talked to an Israeli guy yesterday who had zero knowledge, familiarity, etc. with the size and scope of it. Why would a connected person like that not know anything about it? An amazing feat on someone's part.
Post a Comment
<< Home