Obama blames the founding fathers for his failures
Mr. "At least a B+" President blames the founding fathers for his failures, and says that he's going to keep trying to find ways to circumvent the constitution. Unbelievable....Let's go to the videotape (Hat Tip: Will).
This guy is looking for a way to become a dictator.
Labels: Barack Hussein Obama
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 8:29 PM
5 Comments:
Obama didn't blame the founders.
He said Congress are halting the changes that the people want him to make.
Read again, OR RATHER LISTEN AGAIN.
THE PEOPLE WANT CHANGE. THEY THE STRANGHOLD ON CONGRESS BROKEN.
THEY ARE BLAMING OBAMA FOR NOT DOING ENOUGH OF WHAT YOU ARE BLAMING HIM FOR DOING.
You and your buddies are the enemies of the American people, not Obama. He was voted in, and people are disappointed that he hasn't brought the change (that you don't want) about.
One of those changes is an end to the occupation, and end of the your idolaltorous dream called 'national religious zionism' that your God is too impotent to carry out for you. OOppps, your god as in you idol worshippers, and your false gods
Thank God that it is difficult to force congress to implement Obama’s agenda. That was exactly why our founding fathers designed our republic in the fashion they did – to accomplish just that effect, i.e. to impede politically radical politicians from destroying this nation in one term in office. It was to give the citizens of this nation an opportunity to rectify their mistakes before losing all of their rights and liberties without any recourse. We have one chance to make much needed corrections this year to our federal government. God help us if we miss it – or mess it up.
Respectfully, HaShaliach, you have it backwards (sort of) with your first point. The Founding Fathers did not intend for Congress to do any President's bidding. They intended for the President to execute the laws passed by Congress. A president can only go so far before Congress restrains him (or her, one day). As a practical matter, how far a president can go is mostly a political question. This Congress let this President go pretty far in the first two years.
Chayma, you're bitter and deranged. The President had substantial Democratic majorities in Congress for his first two years. You complain that he has failed to accomplish all he wanted. I don't think that's Carl's fault, or his buddies'. The President is just a miserable failure of an executive and leader. And, no, he was not elected to end "the occupation." Above all else, he has proven himself completely unable to accomplish anything with respect to the Middle East.
Man. oh man! Dang that pesky Constitution. How dare it make the people the sovereign and not the government!
Man. oh man! Dang that pesky Constitution. How dare it make the people the sovereign and not the government!
Post a Comment
<< Home