Powered by WebAds

Thursday, October 27, 2011

A primer on the Mughrabi Gate controversy

Nadav Shragai explains what the Mughrabi Gate controversy is all about.
During the winter of 2004, the sand embankment in Jerusalem’s Old City known as the Mughrabi Ascent – which provides access to the Mughrabi Gate of the Temple Mount from the area of the Western Wall – collapsed due to rainstorms, snow, and a minor earthquake. Since the Mughrabi Gate is the only entranceway for non-Muslim visitors to the mount, and it also provides access for Israeli security forces in time of emergency, a temporary wooden bridge was erected.

The Jerusalem District Court has determined that the temporary bridge is no longer a suitable solution and has upheld the legality of the plan to replace it with a permanent bridge. The plan to establish a permanent bridge, and the archaeological excavations performed prior to constructing the new bridge, did not endanger and do not endanger the mosques on the Temple Mount which are located hundreds of meters from it.

Israel has acted with total transparency, allowing international supervision over the excavations at the location (by UNESCO and Turkey), and even positioned cameras that provided live transmission of the archaeological activities there. A UNESCO delegation report on 12 March 2007 determined that “no work is being conducted inside the Haram es-Sharif [Temple Mount], nor is there anything in the nature of the works being performed at this stage that could constitute a threat to the stability of the Western Wall and the Al-Aqsa Mosque.”

When the Mughrabi Ascent collapsed, Israel established almost immediate contact with Jordan and throughout the years the Jordanians have been partners in the planning of the new Mughrabi Bridge. After negotiations lasting years, an understanding was signed on 21 June 2011 between Israel and Jordan concerning the new bridge, but a surprise reversal in the Jordanian position led to a governmental order to freeze the project.

On 22 May 2011, Jerusalem Municipal Engineer Shlomo Eshkol demanded that the temporary bridge be dismantled quickly and the permanent bridge be built as soon as possible. Concerns include the potential collapse of the wooden bridge (currently supported by iron scaffolding) while it is being used by security forces or tourists, resulting in scores of fatalities if it fell into the women’s prayer area at the Western Wall below.

The erection of a new bridge is legal from the perspective of both Israeli law and international law. It is time to put an end to the Mughrabi Gate affair, which has been blown up beyond all proportion, and to speedily replace the temporary bridge with a permanent one.
Read the whole thing. It will also give you a taste for what happened during the Jordanian occupation of the Old City from 1948-67.

Unfortunately, where I see this going is UNESCO and Turkey coming back here and reporting that Israel is damaging the mosques on the Temple Mount (which would be a lie) and demanding that all work be stopped. Then (if Israel listens - and presumably there will be orchestrated riots to 'help' us listen), we can all wait for a tragedy to happen.

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At 4:50 PM, Blogger NormanF said...

Of course.

Because in the eyes of the world, Jerusalem is "occupied territory." No matter what Israel does or doesn't do, it will be blamed. Hopefully, it will go ahead and build a new permanent bridge. The world condemnation will be deafening but Israel can survive it.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google