Powered by WebAds

Sunday, February 06, 2011

Will Egypt be better off with democracy?

Will Egypt be better off with democracy than it is under Mubarak? Reading this article, you have to wonder.
During the Mubarak regime’s 30-year rule, Egypt has fought no war with any neighbouring country. That isn’t the case with Lebanon, Iraq, Kuwait, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Chad or the Palestinians, or with important non-Arab countries in the Middle East such as Iran. Neither did Mubarak invade communities within his country at odds with his regime, as occurred elsewhere in the Middle East, Turkey’s brutal suppression of the Kurds being but one example.

Throughout the Muslim Middle East, Christians under persecution have been fleeing for decades. In some Muslim countries, the religious cleansing of Christians is near complete. The Christian population of Syria, 33% in 1920, is now down to 10%. Turkey’s 15% in 1920 is at 1% today. Iran’s Christian population is at 0.4%, Gaza’s is at 0.2%. Egypt’s Coptic Christians, though they too have been mercilessly persecuted over the decades, stand out in stark contrast. Before Mubarak rose to power, the country’s Copts seemed destined for a fate similar to Christians elsewhere in the Middle East, effectively barred from so much as repairing their churches.

Mubarak, alone among Egypt’s many leaders over the last century, reversed what had been a relentless erosion of the Copts’ rights. He allowed hundreds of church repairs and even the construction of some new ones. He returned to the Coptic Orthodox Church more than half of the 1,500 acres of land that the state had seized in 1952 for the benefit of Islamic institutions and indicated an intention to have the rest returned. He decreed that churches and mosques should enjoy equal legal rights, and reintroduced into school curriculums the role that Christianity had played in Egyptian history. State media not only ended propaganda directed against Christians, it allowed live broadcasts of Easter and Christmas services.

Most of all, and much more than any of his predecessors, he attempted to physically protect the Copts against the continual violence that they faced from the country’s Islamic extremists, the Muslim Brotherhood. Despite public opposition in a country with widespread Islamic sympathies, he systematically tracked down those who murdered Copts and punished them. A terrorist attack this past Christmas that claimed 23 lives was the first the Copts suffered in 12 years. Little wonder that Egypt’s Christians — who number as many as 18 million in a country of 83 million — have been all but absent in the anti-Mubarak street demonstrations and have been praying in their churches for his continuance in power.

...

Muslim Egyptians as a whole do want democracy — polls show 59% view democracy as “very good.” But in the Egyptian mind, democratic rule implies something very different than it does to Westerners. Almost three-quarters of Muslim Egyptians wants to see the “strict imposition of Sharia law,” more than half want men and women segregated in the workplace, 82% want adulterers to be stoned, 77% view whippings and cutting off of hands as proper punishment for theft, and 84% favour the death penalty for Muslims who leave their faith. All told, 91% of Egyptians want to keep “Western values out of Islamic countries” (80% strongly), and 67% want “to unify all Islamic countries into a single Islamic state or caliphate.”

The coexistence of democracy and Sharia law should come as no surprise: The chief proponent in Egypt over the last decade advocating democracy has been, in fact, the Muslim Brotherhood itself.

If it comes to power, this organization, which has spawned most of the world’s Islamic terrorist groups, would bring Egypt a brand of democracy that would dash the West’s hopes for Egypt, starting with a rollback of social reforms. Mubarak officially banned female genital mutilation in 2007 — Egypt had had the world’s second-highest rate at 97% — leading to an immediate drop in the rate to 91% in just one year, according to the World Health Organization. Under the Muslim Brotherhood, that ban would likely be reversed, as would plans to return lands now controlled by Muslims to Christians, as would the relative tolerance shown Christians in worship and education.
Read the whole thing.

Labels: , , ,

1 Comments:

At 11:02 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Mubarak in many ways was an enlightened Arab autocrat. He is also the last true secularist Egypt will have. Under any future regime in which the MB plays either a significant or a leading role all that will be reversed.

The bottom line is - no, democracy will not necessarily bring more freedom and tolerance to Egypt. And the fact Islamists support democracy reveals their plans are for something other than a Western-style liberal state in Egypt and in that regard they have the support of millions of Egyptians.

What could go wrong indeed

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google