Powered by WebAds

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Using human rights to squeeze Iran

One would think that this kind of approach might appeal to President Obama, if he could get his nose out of Ahmadinejad's rear end long enough to think about it (Hat Tip: Daily Alert).
As Washington assesses how to deal with Iran's nuclear challenge, it must widen its canvass and consider its approach to the slow, simmering political change unfolding there. Given the alienation of the population and the fragmentation of the elite, the regime will not be able to manage a succession crisis. For all his faults, Khamenei is the glue that keeps the Islamic Republic together. Should the elderly supreme leader pass from the scene, the system is too divided and lacks a sufficient social base to easily choose another successor. In the process of consolidating his power and ensuring the fraudulent election of his protege, Khamenei has all but ensured that his republic will not survive him. All this suggests that a transactional relationship with Iran whereby carrots and sticks are traded for modest nuclear concessions is unwise.

History has shown that human rights do contribute to dramatic political transformations. The Helsinki Accord of 1975 invigorated the moribund opposition groups behind the Iron Curtain and ensured a smooth transition to a post-communist reality. More so than arms races and arms control treaties, those accords defied the skeptics and cynics by contributing to the collapse of the mighty Soviet empire. An emphasis on human rights today can not only buttress the viability of the Green Movement but also socialize an important segment of the security services, clerical estate and intelligentsia to the norms to which a state must adhere in order to become a member of global society. The successor generation of Iranian leaders would then be more sensitive to their obligations to citizens and the international community. By linking its diplomacy to human rights behavior, the United States could mitigate Iran's nuclear ambitions and pave the way for a peaceful transition from clerical autocracy to a more responsible and humane government.
Read the whole thing.

Anyone want to take bets on which happens first: Iran develops a nuclear weapon or Khameni dies?

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

At 11:20 PM, Blogger NormanF said...

It could be done.

Does the world though have an interest in stopping Iran?

Not if the major powers interest in trying to coax the mullahs into a deal on Iran's nuclear arms' ambition is any indication.

What could go wrong indeed

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google