Silence is not a policy
This is a commentary from DEBKA about Prime Minister Netanyahu agreeing (and let's face it - that's what he did as I said two and a half weeks ago) to a freeze in Ramat Shlomo for two years. It's spot-on (Hat Tip: Leah P). As a result, Palestinians are celebrating their success in manipulating the Obama administration into squeezing concessions out of Israel even before the talks begin - and on Jerusalem, no less.And yes, of course, the 'freeze' in Judea and Samaria is going to be extended. I've been saying that since Netanyahu agreed to it in the first place.
Given Netanyahu's dogged insistence that there would be no Israel concessions on Jerusalem, its undivided capital, even after Vice President Joe Biden's unfortunate visit to Jerusalem in March, three hard questions demand answers:
1. If the Israeli prime minister can't stand by his solemn pledges to Israel and the Jewish people on Jerusalem, how much credibility can be attributed his other statements?
2. Is he made of tough enough material to withstand pressures, or does he have a built-in tendency to surrender when the going is rough?
3. This answer is critical when applied to matters of national security, such as the threats from Hizballah and a nuclear-armed Iran.
The pretext offered by his aides that giving ground on Ramat Shlomo cost nothing because the pre-planning process requires another two years at least does not hold water. From his own and his predecessors' experience, Netanyahu must know that every concession on a question of principle opens the door to bullying for more. It will now be clear to all that if he cannot stand the heat on Jerusalem, he will fold again in September when the West Bank settlement freeze is up and find good reason to let it run on and on.
Netanyahu manifested weakness by never once hitting back at the unbridled and offensive assaults thrown at Israel and him personally by members of the Palestinian negotiating team, Saeb Erekat and Abd Rabbo in the last two days. He ignored the insults and welcomed the PLO decision to endorse the resumption of peace talks over which Abbas stalled for 15 months, mildly hoping there would be no more preconditions.
He even abstained even from calling for Palestinian officials to watch their language, least of all threaten to stay away from the table until they stopped their incitement.
Netanyahu likewise has nothing to say to the abuse heaped on Israel by Iranian leaders and pro-Palestinian elements in the West, some of it rabidly anti-Semitic.
Silence is not a policy. At best, it is a tactic of survival and at worst, presents the appearance of timidity. In either case, he has left Israel wide open to more arm-twisting on its most fundamental interests.
What could go wrong?
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 9:15 PM
3 Comments:
He did get the armaments released to Israel. The bunkerbusters you will need so badly. You don't know the preasure he must be under to keep the nation safe while dealing with that machiavellian President Obama. Marinaman, Colorado
Yep - the Stupid Jews won't wake up in September. And any one who thinks Israel will discover reason and its national interests then will be in for a rude awakening.
What could go wrong indeed
While I agree with everything the author writes, right or wrong, I suspect that Netanyahu is just trying to play along on the Palestinian front with both eyes on Iran. That is what keeps him up at night.
History will judge him by how he handles Iran.
Post a Comment
<< Home