Powered by WebAds

Friday, April 16, 2010

Assad shill: Syria will stop arming Hezbullah if it gets the Golan back

Assad shill Josh Landis claims not to know whether Syria delivered long-range scud missiles to Hezbullah this week (despite Hezbullah's admission that it did). He dismisses the scuds as 'wobbly rockets' and claims that the Mossad's data about them was 'worthless.' And then he comes up with this:
The larger question, however, is not whether Syria has delivered Scuds to Hezbollah. Syria has been rebuilding Hezbollah's missile supplies ever since they were largely exhausted during Israel's 2006 incursion into Lebanon. It will continue to do so as long as Israel refuses to trade land for peace. Syria says it will no longer have any reason to arm Hezbollah once it gets the Golan back and can sign a peace agreement with Israel.
That's curious. Because what Israel has asked in return for the deal that 'everyone knows' will bring peace on the Syrian border is that Syria declare the conflict to be over and that it drop its relationships with Iran, Hezbullah and other terrorist organizations. If Landis is correct, that's a slam dunk to happen. So if Syria wants peace, as Landis claims, why does Syria keep saying it won't drop those relations?
Syria understands that the reason Israel will not return the Golan Heights is because of the terrible imbalance in power between the two countries. So long as there is no peace, Syria will feel compelled to arm itself and its allies. Only this week at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, we were reminded that Israel has hundreds of atomic warheads that can be delivered by missile, plane, and submarine. What's more, Washington continues to supply Israel with large amounts of military aid and cutting-edge military technology. Israel accuses Syria of trying to change the balance of power by introducing Scuds to Lebanon, but from Syria's point of view, it is Israel that has skewed the regional balance.
Actually, Syria took a better shot at changing the balance of power in the region by trying to build a nuclear reactor at al-Kibar. Landis conveniently forgets that. Fortunately, Israel destroyed that reactor in 2007.

2 Comments:

At 11:37 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

If only Israel returned to three square meters in size, the Arab World have no quarrel with the Jews and peace and good will would break out all over. What Josh Landis conveniently overlooks is Israel has given up a lot of land and the one thing it hasn't produced is peace.

No Israeli concessions are going to ever make that happen.

 
At 1:09 PM, Blogger Juniper in the Desert said...

Josh Landis is an outrageous liar: Israel gave up the Sinai and the terrorists used it to get closer to Israel,and Gaza: where is the peace?

Where is the proof that giving up land leads to peace?

No more land. Israel needs land to protect itself. The islamic monster is insatiable!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google