Pipes: Obama can salvage his Presidency by bombing Iran
The 'hope and change' is fading fast. The only way for President Obumbler to turn his Presidency around, says Middle East expert Daniel Pipes, is to bomb Iran.[Obama] needs a dramatic gesture to change the public perception of him as a light-weight, bumbling ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes are high, where he can take charge, and where he can trump expectations.Pipes is right that bombing Iran would make the Obumbler more popular and pull the public opinion polls out of the dumps. There's one small problem: Obumber really is a light-weight, bumbling ideologue, and light-weight, bumbling ideologues don't take bold steps like attacking Iran.
Such an opportunity does exist: Obama can give orders for the U.S. military to destroy Iran’s nuclear-weapon capacity.
Circumstances are propitious. First, U.S. intelligence agencies have reversed their preposterous 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, the one that claimed with “high confidence” that Tehran had “halted its nuclear weapons program.” No one other than the Iranian rulers and their agents denies that the regime is rushing headlong to build a large nuclear arsenal.
Second, if the apocalyptic-minded leaders in Tehran get the Bomb, they render the Middle East yet more volatile and dangerous. They might deploy these weapons in the region, leading to massive death and destruction. Eventually, they could launch an electromagnetic pulse attack on the United States, utterly devastating the country. By eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat, Obama protects the homeland and sends a message to American’s friends and enemies.
Third, polling shows longstanding American support for an attack on the Iranian nuclear infrastructure:
...
Not only does a strong majority — 57, 52, 58, 61, and 61 percent in these five polls — already favor using force, but after a strike Americans will presumably rally around the flag, sending that number much higher.
Fourth, if the U.S.limited its strike to taking out Iran’s nuclear facilities and did not attempt any regime change, it would require few “boots on the ground” and entail relatively few casualties, making an attack more politically palatable.
Just as 9/11 caused voters to forget George W. Bush’s meandering early months, a strike on Iranian facilities would dispatch Obama’s feckless first year down the memory hole and transform the domestic political scene. It would sideline health care, prompt Republicans to work with Democrats, and make the netroots squeal, independents reconsider, and conservatives swoon.
But the chance to do good and do well is fleeting.
What could go wrong?
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 10:31 AM
5 Comments:
His Highness Husain Barak Soetoro aka Obama is unable to attack IRAN, most unable psychologically
Pipes is dreaming. Obama is not going to bomb Iran!
He won't even do it in order to salvage his so called presidency.
what are you talking about, it's pretty obvious that obama is not going to bomb iran (ever). why he should do it after all the effort he is making trying to let ahmadineyad and the ayatolas get the nuke?
Mushi, I absolutely detest Obama but let's be honest here, Iran has been "getting the nuke" for a long time.
What did Bush do to stop it?
Having said that, Obama on his watch has most certainly allowed the genie out of the bottle.
Bush shunned Iran and Obama reaches out with that idiotic diplomacy double-speak. In the end, no one did anything to stop it.
The shame is in world leaders who mouth the words, "never again" while having no intention to make never again "never happen again."
hey carl
i will urge obama to bomb iran, if you pay my taxes till i die
we cant even afford the costs of the two occupations we are involved with now...but you honestly believe that expanding hostilities into iran will benefit the obama administration?
im not afraid of iran...but if you are, why dont you urge the israeli gov to bomb em
and you pay for it
Post a Comment
<< Home