Powered by WebAds

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Blind ambition

South African journalist R. W. Johnson fills in the rest of the world on the lengths to which Richard Golstone is willing to go to get ahead. Pity anyone who's in Goldstone's path: Goldstone's behavior will not surprise those who have followed his career.
As a young advocate in South Africa he drew criticism for the way he privately entertained the attorneys who might bring him cases: this was seen as touting for custom. Similarly, his decision to accept nomination as a judge from the apartheid regime drew criticism from many liberal lawyers who refused to accept such nomination because it meant enforcing apartheid laws.

...

Then, as the political situation changed, so did Goldstone. Entrusted by President F. W. de Klerk with a commission to investigate the causes of violence, Goldstone publicized much damning evidence against the apartheid regime but refused to investigate any form of violence organized by the African National Congress (ANC). This naturally made him the ANC's favorite judge.

Moreover, Goldstone, issued a dramatic press statement suggesting that the military were involved in illegal partisan behavior. De Klerk had to dismiss 23 senior military figures, though the evidence for their guilt promised by Goldstone was never actually forthcoming. The officers sued De Klerk, who had to back down and apologize.

De Klerk was furious at Goldstone's sensational use of untested evidence and, knowing that Goldstone was ambitious to succeed Boutros-Boutros Ghali as UN secretary-general, referred to him as "Richard-Richard Goldstone."

Then, to the ANC's delight, just weeks before the 1994 election Goldstone made dramatic allegations of illegal and partisan behavior against three police generals, effectively ending their careers. Yet Goldstone had made no attempt to put these allegations to the men concerned, nor allowed them to defend themselves or test the accusations through cross-examination.

Goldstone justified publicizing these untested allegations by saying it was important to give them publicity before the election. The ANC couldn't have agreed more strongly: when they won, Goldstone was given a seat on the Constitutional Court.

Heedless of the fact that the doctrine of collective guilt has been the basis of anti-Semitic campaigns down the ages, Goldstone publicly urged all whites to apologize for their collective guilt and advised younger South Africans that they must not expect top jobs because of "the sins of the fathers."

The effect of these high profile actions was to give Goldstone international fame as an icon of political correctness. Hence his appointment as prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
The story continues. Read the whole thing.

What emerges from Johnson's article is a portrait of a man who is driven by what former White House counselor John Dean referred to as blind ambition in his book of the same name that is probably the most important account of the Watergate scandal. That would mean the ability to convince himself that he's doing the right thing even when he's doing the wrong thing - because the wrong thing advances his career. That seems to describe Goldstone to a tee.

2 Comments:

At 12:30 PM, Blogger Ashan said...

"Then, as the political situation changed, so did Goldstone. Entrusted by President F. W. de Klerk with a commission to investigate the causes of violence, Goldstone publicized much damning evidence against the apartheid regime but refused to investigate any form of violence organized by the African National Congress (ANC). This naturally made him the ANC's favorite judge."

Blind ambition, indeed.
This conceited, self-serving opportunistic, well, jerk should be sued by South Africans, Israelis and others for all he's worth, and much, much more for the trail of destruction and misery he has caused over so many years.

This article is a bombshell. It should be disseminated as widely as possible. This vile, tyrannical narcissist should be brought to his knees - better yet - thrown into a dank cell for the rest of his days.

 
At 4:21 PM, Blogger NormanF said...

The fact Goldstone is a Jew doesn't change the fact what he authored against Israel is a blood libel. Now Israel is being asked to prove a negative. That can never happen any more than medieval Jews could ever clear themselves of the blood libel calumny.

He may protest all he likes but he made it impossible for Israel to get its good name back in front of the world. The man is a treacherous, morally dishonest and self-conceited human being. All of which are on exhibit in the now infamous report which bears his name.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google