Powered by WebAds

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Something fishy going on

Victor Davis Hanson points out that there's something really fishy going on in the disclosure about Iran's nuclear facility (Hat Tip: Instapundit).
But to me it is a much bigger deal that Obama knew of this facility even during the transition last autumn, as his radical new policy toward Iran was being formulated.

Officially, the American people have had to assume the truthfulness of the most recent, highly questionable national intelligence estimate of 2007 (“We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program”). Why, then, was not the updated information released earlier, and the 2007 estimate rendered inoperative, especially since that flawed assessment has been used to demagogue the issue? I recall candidate Joe Biden in 2007 asserting, "Let's get this straight. In 2003, they stopped their program." And it was the supposed authority of the 2007 estimate that prompted candidate Obama to claim that the Senate decree naming the Iranian Revolutionary Guards a terrorist organization was wrong and gave Bush "a blank check" to go to war with Iran.

Other questions. If there are suddenly two facilities, why not three, four, or more? Do we know about others that are better left undisclosed? And did we keep quiet about this supposed intelligence coup to allow bold, new diplomatic efforts to proceed — efforts that might not have gone on had the American people learned that the Iranians were escalating, that the IAEA was incompetent or duplicitous, and that the much-publicized diplomatic initiatives Obama set to wow us with in October might be sidetracked if the information were disclosed?
Hmmm.

3 Comments:

At 4:21 AM, Blogger StevenInBrooklynNY said...

My guess is that Israel knew even before the US, and told Washington: either you disclose this, or we will.

 
At 4:28 AM, Blogger What is "Occupation" said...

so let's get this straight...

Obama KNEW that report on Iran was bullshit and still hammered home wrongness of it, KNOWING the truth was Iran was in fact a problem and was lying...

Obumbler fur sure...

what a jackass...

 
At 5:15 AM, Blogger NormanF said...

Just as I observed in the last thread.

Iran is simply not to be taken at its word.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google